Skip to main content

Intelligent Tutoring Design Alternatives in a Serious Game

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 11597)

Abstract

The adaptive learning potential in video games can be increased by incorporating intelligent tutoring system (ITS) approaches. However, very few studies have examined the ITS capability in a game. Across a four-year research project, we implemented a number of intelligent tutoring design alternatives and integrated them into the serious 3D video game. The game, Heuristica, was designed to improve critical thinking by exposing players to different cognitive biases through game play, and then adaptively giving players opportunities to practice avoiding or mitigating each bias. We describe the intelligent tutoring system, and how we structured the learner’s environment, provided learners with tailored feedback, supported spaced and massed practice, and provided opportunities for in-game learner reflection. We describe the design and functionality of the Student Modeler and interface features that support student feedback and interaction. We evaluate the tradeoffs made in the student model design and the impact they had on the game experience, focusing on the open student model summary screen, mixed-initiative opportunities and algorithms for selection of learning opportunities. This paper contributes to the intelligent tutoring literature by describing one of the first intelligent tutoring systems embedded in a 3D game for training and provides lessons learned from implementations in a single game.

Keywords

  • Adaptive learning environment
  • Intelligent tutoring design
  • Video games

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
EUR   29.95
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR   74.89
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR   98.99
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

References

  1. Carr, B., Goldstein, I.: Overlays: a theory of modeling for computer-aided instruction. AI Lab Memo 406. MIT, Cambridge (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chi, M.T., Siler, S.A., Jeong, H.: Can tutors monitor students’ understanding accurately? Cogn. Instr. 22(3), 363–387 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Goodman, B., Soller, A., Linton, F., Gaimari, R.: Encouraging student reflection and articulation using a learning companion. In: Proceedings of the AI-ED 1997 World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 151–158 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Graesser, A.C., Hu, X., Sottilare, R.: Intelligent tutoring systems. In: International Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 246–255. Routledge (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Graesser, A., et al.: Critiquing media reports with flawed scientific findings: Operation ARIES! A game with animated agents and natural language trialogues. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6095, pp. 327–329. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_60

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Halpern, D.F., Millis, K., Graesser, A.C., Butler, H., Forsyth, C., Cai, Z.: Operation ARA: a computerized learning game that teaches critical thinking and scientific reasoning. Think. Skills Creat. 7(2), 93–100 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Holden, S., Kay, J.: The scrutable user model and beyond. Basser Department of Computer Science, University of Sydney (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hwang, G.J.: A conceptual map model for developing intelligent tutoring systems. Comput. Educ. 40(3), 217–235 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Lynch, C., Ashley, K.D., Aleven, V., Pinkwart, N.: Defining ‘Ill-Defined Domains’: a literature survey. In: Aleven, V., Ashley, K.D., Lynch, C., Pinkwart, N. (eds.) Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems Workshop on Ill-Defined Domains, Jhongli, Taiwan, pp. 1–10 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mayer, R.E.: Computer Games for Learning: An Evidence-Based Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Millis, K., Forsyth, C., Butler, H., Wallace, P., Graesser, A., Halpern, D.: Operation ARIES!: a serious game for teaching scientific inquiry. In: Ma, M., Oikonomou, A., Jain, L. (eds.) Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, pp. 169–195. Springer, London (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9_10

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Mullinix, G., et al.: Heuristica: designing a serious game for improving decision making. Paper presented at IEEE Games Innovation Conference (IGIC), Vancouver, BC (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Psotka, J., Massey, L.D., Mutter, S.A.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Lessons Learned. Psychology Press, London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roose, K., Veinott, E.: Roller coaster park manager by day problem solver by night: effect of video game play on problem solving. In: Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 277–282. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. VanLehn, K.: The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educ. Psychol. 46(4), 197–221 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Veinott, E., et al.: The effect of 3rd person perspective and session duration on training decision making in a serious video game. In: Proceedings of the Games Innovation Conference (IGIC), 2013 IEEE International, Vancouver, BC, pp. 256–262. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Veinott, E., et al.: The effect of cognitive and visual fidelity on decision making: is more information better? In: IEEE Games Innovation Conference (IGIC), 2014 IEEE International, Toronto, ON. IEEE, October 2014

    Google Scholar 

  18. Veinott, E., Whitaker, E.: Leaving hints: Using in-game player reflection to improve and measure learning. In: International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (HCII). Orlando, FL (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Whitaker, E.T., et al.: The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring on training in a video game. In: 2013 IEEE International Games Innovation Conference (IGIC), pp. 267–274. IEEE, September 2013

    Google Scholar 

  20. Woolf, B.P.: Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-Centered Strategies for Revolutionizing e-Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dempster, F.N.: The spacing effect: a case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. Am. Psychol. 43(8), 627 (1988)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Wylie, R., Chi, M.T.: The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pp. 271–286. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) via the Air Force Research Laboratory (Contract #FA8650-11-C-7177). The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright annotation thereon. Disclaimer: The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of IARPA, AFRL, or the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Whitaker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Whitaker, E., Trewhitt, E., Veinott, E.S. (2019). Intelligent Tutoring Design Alternatives in a Serious Game. In: Sottilare, R., Schwarz, J. (eds) Adaptive Instructional Systems. HCII 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11597. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22341-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22341-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22340-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22341-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)