Distance in International Business Research: A Commentary
- 1.3k Downloads
We find that the recommendations that Beugelsdijk, Ambos and Nell (Journal of International Business Studies 49 (9): 1113–1137, 2018) make about Mahalanobis distance correction are useful not only in the analysis of multiple pairs of home and host countries as in their paper, but also when measuring distance against a single country. By testing different culture dimensions, we further support their idea that the selection of the culture framework has important consequences, and even more so in studies with a single reference home or host country.
- Hofstede, G., G.J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- House, R.J., P.J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P.W. Dorfman, and V. Gupta, eds. 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Peterson, M.F., T.S. Barreto, and P.B. Smith. 2016. Revised sources of guidance measures: Six events and demographic controls. In Unity, diversity and culture, ed. C. Roland-Lévy, P. Denoux, B. Voyer, P. Boski, and W.K. Gabrenya Jr., 213–217. Melbourne: International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology. www.iaccp.org. Accessed 4 Feb 2019.Google Scholar
- ———. 2008. The 7 Schwartz cultural value orientation scores for 80 countries. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304715744_The_7_Schwartz_cultural_value_orientation_scores_for_80_countries