Advertisement

The City of L’Aquila as a Living Lab: The INCIPICT Project and the 5G Trial

  • Fabio FranchiEmail author
  • Fabio Graziosi
  • Andrea Marotta
  • Claudia Rinaldi
Chapter
Part of the EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing book series (EAISICC)

Abstract

The city of L’Aquila is one of the five Italian cities selected by the Italian Government to host the 5G experimentation. This city has the specificity of being a “living lab,” because it is currently passing through the reconstruction process after the earthquake of 2009, thus offering a “green field” scenario to the scientific community. This process is led according to the innovative paradigm of “Smart City,” whose foundation is the INCIPICT project (INnovating CIty Planning through Information and Communications Technology), described in this chapter. Its main focus is the development of an innovative optical network, which surrounds the city center and connects the main public sites of interest. The optical network represents an open test bed for researchers in optical transmission and networking as well as the basis for innovative wireless technologies and smart city applications.

This chapter describes the INCIPICT project highlighting its role in the ongoing 5G trial hosted in the city of L’Aquila. The 5G experimental activities will be driven by several use cases according to a vertical pilot approach. In this chapter a description of the 5G use cases under the coordination of the University of L’Aquila together with the related experimental activities is provided.

Keywords

Smart city 5G Trial Test bed 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research would not be possible without the participation of ZTE Corporation and WindTre (H3G) to the ongoing experimentation process. This work was partially supported by the Italian Government under CIPE resolution no. 135 (December 21, 2012), project INnovating City Planning through Information and Communication Technologies (INCIPICT).

References

  1. 1.
    5GPPP (2016a), 5G Vision. WhitepaperGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Commission (2016), 5G for Europe: an action plan. COM(2016)588Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    5G Infrastructure Association (2016), 5G PAN-European Trials Roadmap. WhitepaperGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    5GPPP (2016b), Empowering verticals. WhitepaperGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K.E. Skouby, P. Lynggaard (2014), Smart home and smart city solutions enabled by 5g, iot, aai and cot services. in: 2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), pp 874–878, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3I.2014.7019822
  6. 6.
    INCIPICT (2017), http://incipict.univaq.it. Accessed: 25 Nov 2017
  7. 7.
    R.P. Davey, D. Grossman, M. Rasztovits-Wiech, D.B. Payne, D. Nesset, A.E. Kelly, A. Rafel, S. Appathurai, S.H. Yang, Long-reach passive optical networks. J. Lightwave Technol. 27(3), 273–291 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.S. Thyagaturu, A. Mercian, M.P. McGarry, M. Reisslein, W. Kellerer, Software defined optical networks (SDONs): a comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 18(4), 2738–2786 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    3GPP TR 38801 (2017), Study on new radio access technology: Radio access architecture and interfaces. Release 14Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Marotta, D. Cassioli, K. Kondepu, C. Antonelli, L. Valcarenghi (2018a), Enabling flexible functional split through software defined 5g converged access, in 2018 International Conference on Communication (ICC), pp. 1–5Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Chen, M. Matinmikko, X. Chen, X. Zhou, P. Ahokangas, Software defined mobile networks: concept, survey, and research directions. IEEE Commun. Mag. 53(11), 126–133 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Marotta, K. Kondepu, D. Cassioli, C. Antonelli, L.M. Correia, L. Valcarenghi (2018b), Software defined 5g converged access as a viable techno-economic solution, in 2018 Optical Networking and Communication Conference (OFC), pp 1–5Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    X. Foukas, N. Nikaein, M.M. Kassem, M.K. Marina, K. Kontovasilis (2016), Flexran: a flexible and programmable platform for software-defined radio access networks, in: Proceedings of the 12th International on Conference on Emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies, ACM, New York, NY, USA, CoNEXT ’16, pp. 427–441Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ONF (2017) CORD—mobile central office re-architected as a datacenter, https://www.opennetworking.org/platforms/cord/, accessed 25 Nov 2017
  15. 15.
    A. Marotta, F. Giannone, K. Kondepu, D. Cassioli, C. Antonelli, L. Valcarenghi, P. Castoldi (2017), Reducing comp control message delay in PON backhauled 5g networks, in European Wireless 2017; 23th European Wireless Conference, pp. 1–5Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.Y. Mesleh, H. Haas, S. Sinanovic, C.W. Ahn, S. Yun, Spatial modulation. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technol. 57(4), 2228–2241 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Ahlswede, N. Cai, S.Y. Li, R.W. Yeung, Network information flow. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor. 46(4), 1204–1216 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Katti, H. Rahul, W. Hu, D. Katabi, M. Medard, J. Crowcroft, Xors in the air: practical wireless network coding. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 16(3), 497–510 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D’Errico L, Franchi F, F. Graziosi, C. Rinaldi, F. Tarquini (2017), Design and implementation of a children safety system based on iot technologies, in: 2017 2nd International Multidisciplinary Conference on Computer and Energy Science (SpliTech), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.A. Hanson, H.C. Powell Jr., A.T. Barth, K. Ringgenberg, B.H. Calhoun, J.H. Aylor, J. Lach, Body area sensor networks: challenges and opportunities. Computer 42(1), 58–65 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    P. Khan, M.A. Hussain, K.S. Kwak, Medical applications of wireless body area networks. Int J Digital Content Technol Appl 3, 185–193 (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. Gattulli, F. Graziosi, F. Federici, F. Potenza, A. Colarieti, M. Lepidi, Structural health monitoring of the basilica s. maria di collemaggio. Res. Appl. Struct. Eng. Mech. Comput., 823–824 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. Cinque F. Valentini, A. Iovine, M. Pratesi (2017), An adaptive strategy to mitigate instability in the ETSI DCC: experimental validation, in: 2017 15th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST), pp. 1–6, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1109/ITST.2017.7972223

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabio Franchi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fabio Graziosi
    • 1
  • Andrea Marotta
    • 1
  • Claudia Rinaldi
    • 1
  1. 1.Università degli Studi dell’AquilaL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations