Time psychology distinguishes between two main types of perception or judgment about time. First, the perception of duration—in other words, the manner in which we are able to judge how long an interval, a stimuli or an event lasted. This type of judgment is further divided between prospective and retrospective judgments of duration. In prospective timing, one knows that one will be required to make a judgment of duration ahead of the event: for example, ‘listen to this piece of music, when it is finished you will be asked how long it was’. In retrospective timing, people judge the duration of an event when they did not know that they would be asked, for example, ‘How long have you been reading this abstract?’ The perception of duration has been investigated a great deal by psychologists, and we have some excellent functional models describing the characteristics of the mechanisms. The most successful model revolves around the notion of an internal pacemaker-accumulator clock. The neural underpinnings of the mechanism remain obscure, but some progress has been made. The second type of judgments are ‘passage of time judgments (POJs). These are judgements of how quickly time seems to pass in any given situation, not a judgement of their duration (although often they are expressed in that way, e.g., ‘that lecture felt like 4hrs long’). POJs are more of a ‘feeling’ judgment and seem to be a hedonistic expression of boredom, engagement or frustration. POJs have also been investigated experimentally, and we have some insights into how they may relate to the perception of duration. This chapter will explore these judgments, their mechanism, the relationship between them and how successful they are in explaining the everyday experiences of time that people report.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
These judgments had been distinguished from each other by William James (1890), but have been seemingly forgotten about by the timing field.
Baum, S. K., Boxley, R. L., & Sokolowski, M. (1984). Time perception and psychological well-being in the elderly. Psychiatric Quarterly, 56, 54–61.
Block, R. A., & Zakay, D. (1997). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 184–197.
Droit-Volet, S., & Wearden, J. (2002). Speeding up an internal clock in children? Effects of visual flicker on subjective duration. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 193–211.
Droit-Volet, S., & Wearden, J. (2016). Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using experience sampling methodology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 176.
Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84, 279.
Gibbon, J., & Church, R. M. (1981). Time left: Linear versus logarithmic subjective time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 87.
Gibbon, J., Church, R. M., & Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 52–77.
Goldstone, S., & Lhamon, W. T. (1974). Studies of auditory-visual differences in human time judgment: 1. Sounds are judged longer than lights. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 63–82.
Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., & Kinsbourne, M. (1976). Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 719–730.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: H. Holt.
Janet, P. (1877). Une Illusion D’Optique Interne. Revue Philosophique de la France et de lÉtranger, 3, 497–502.
Jones, L. A., Poliakoff, E., & Wells, J. (2009). Good vibrations: Human interval timing in the vibrotactile modality. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2171–2186.
Lemlich, R. (1975). Subjective acceleration of time with aging. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 235–238.
Ortega, L., & Lopez, F. (2008). Effects of visual flicker on subjective time in a temporal bisection task. Behavioural Processes, 78, 380–386.
Penton-Voak, I. S., Edwards, H., Percival, A., & Wearden, J. H. (1996). Speeding up an internal clock in humans? Effects of click trains on subjective duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 307–320.
Roberts, S., & Church, R. M. (1978). Control of an internal clock. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 318.
Thomas, E. C., & Brown, I. (1974). Time perception and the filled-duration illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 449–458.
Treisman, M., Faulkner, A., Naish, P. L. N., & Brogan, D. (1990). The internal clock: Evidence for a temporal oscillator underlying time perception with some estimates of its characteristic frequency. Perception, 19, 705–748.
Wearden, J. (2016). The psychology of time perception. London: Springer.
Wearden, J. H. (2002). Traveling in time: A time-left analogue for humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 200–208.
Wearden, J. H. (2005). The wrong tree: Time perception and time experience in the elderly. In J. Duncan, L. Phillips, & P. McLeod (Eds.), Measuring the mind: Speed, age, and control (pp. 137–158). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wearden, J. H., Edwards, H., Fakhri, M., & Percival, A. (1998). Why “sounds are judged longer than lights”: Application of a model of the internal clock in humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B, 97–120.
Wearden, J. H., & Jones, L. A. (2007). Is the growth of subjective time in humans a linear or nonlinear function of real time? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1289–1302.
Wearden, J. H., Norton, R., Martin, S., & Montford-Bebb, O. (2007). Internal clock processes and the filled-duration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 716.
Wearden, J. H., Williams, E. A., & Jones, L. A. (2017). What speeds up the internal clock? Effects of clicks and flicker on duration judgements and reaction time. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 488–503.
Williams, E. A., Yüksel, E. M., Stewart, A. J., & Jones, L. A. (2019). Modality differences in timing and the filled-duration illusion: Testing the pacemaker rate explanation. Attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 81, 823–845.
Wittman, M., & Lehnhoff, S. (2005). Age effects in the perception of time. Psychological Reports, 97, 921–935.
Zakay, D. (1992). On prospective time estimation, temporal relevance and temporal uncertainty. In Time, action and cognition (pp. 109–117). Dordrecht: Springer.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, L.A. (2019). The Perception of Duration and the Judgment of the Passage of Time. In: Arstila, V., Bardon, A., Power, S.E., Vatakis, A. (eds) The Illusions of Time. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22048-8_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22047-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22048-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)