Mechanics of Earthquake Source Processes: Insights from Numerical Modeling

  • Nadia LapustaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Structural Integrity book series (STIN, volume 8)


Many major faults separate two tectonic plates that slowly move past each other in opposite directions. The relative motion is accommodated by faults by both sudden dramatic rupture events perceived as earthquakes and much slower, quasi-static fault slips. We study the mechanics of these rupture processes using dynamic-fracture ideas and continuum-mechanics modeling that incorporates laboratory-derived fault friction laws [1, 2, 3], shear heating, and effects of pore fluids [4, 5, 6]. The modeling can reproduce all stages of the past behavior of some fault segments—including locked, slowly moving, and earthquake-producing—with remarkable qualitative, and often quantitative, agreement. In part, it reveals the potential physics behind the unexpected extreme events, such the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku earthquake in Japan [6, 7] that caused up to 40-m tsunami and numerous casualties. The modeling has been used to study situations in which energy-related quantities estimated from seismic shaking based on traditional fracture mechanics theory are valid and when they are not [8]. Such continuum-mechanics-based models, when further developed, will enable us to incorporate our increasing understanding of earthquake source physics into the assessment of seismic hazards and seismicity response to perturbations of natural or anthropogenic origins.


Numerical modeling Dynamic fracture Earthquake mechanics 


  1. 1.
    Dieterich, J.H.: Applications of rate- and state-dependent friction to models of fault slip and earthquake occurrence. Treatise Geophys. 4, 107–129 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lapusta, N., Rice, J.R., Ben-Zion, Y., Zheng, G.: Elastodynamic analysis for slow tectonic loading with spontaneous rupture episodes on faults with rate- and state-dependent friction. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 23765–23789 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lapusta, N., Liu, Y.: Three-dimensional boundary integral modeling of spontaneous earthquake sequences and aseismic slip. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B09303 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rice, J.R.: Heating and weakening of faults during earthquake slip. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 111, B05311 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rubino, V., Rosakis, A.J., Lapusta, N.: Understanding dynamic friction through spontaneously evolving laboratory earthquakes. Nat. Commun. (2017)
  6. 6.
    Noda, H., Lapusta, N.: Stable creeping fault segments can become destructive as a result of dynamic weakening. Nature (2013) Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cubas, N., Lapusta, N., Avouac, J.-P., Perfettini, H.: Numerical modeling of long-term earthquake sequences on the NE Japan megathrust: comparison with observations and implications for fault friction. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 419 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiang, J., Lapusta, N.: Deeper penetration of large earthquakes on seismically quiescent faults. Science 352 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lambert, V., Perry, S., Lapusta, N.: Energy budget of earthquakes: connecting remote observations with local physical behavior. AGU Fall Meeting Abstract (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations