Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE)

  • 500 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents an overview of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) with a focus on the scope and clinical application of ROSE practice. The related issues such as utilization, sensitivity, and specificity, as well as alternatives, are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sharma A, Shepard JO. Lung cancer biopsies. Radiol Clin N Am. 2018;56(3):377–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gonzalez MF, Akhtar I, Manucha V. Changing trends and practices in cytopathology. Acta Cytol. 2017;61(2):91–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. da Cunha Santos G. ROSEs (rapid on-site evaluations) to our patients: the impact on laboratory resources and patient care. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121(10):537–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eszlinger M, Lau L, Ghaznavi S, Symonds C, Chandarana SP, Khalil M, Paschke R. Molecular profiling of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration cytology. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13(7):415–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jain D, Allen TC, Aisner DL, Beasley MB, Cagle PT, Capelozzi VL, Hariri LP, Lantuejoul S, Miller R, Mino-Kenudson M, Monaco SE, Moreira A, Raparia K, Rekhtman N, Roden AC, Roy-Chowdhuri S, da Cunha Santos G, Thunnissen E, Troncone G, Vivero M. Rapid on-site evaluation of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirations for the diagnosis of lung cancer: a perspective from members of the Pulmonary Pathology Society. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(2):253–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. da Cunha Santos G, Saieg MA, Troncone G, Zeppa P. Cytological preparations for molecular analysis: a review of technical procedures, advantages and limitations for referring samples for testing. Cytopathology. 2018;29(2):125–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brainard J, Farver C. The diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer in the molecular era. Mod Pathol. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-018-0156-x. [Epub ahead of print].

  8. Coley SM, Crapanzano JP, Saqi A. FNA, core biopsy, or both for the diagnosis of lung carcinoma: obtaining sufficient tissue for a specific diagnosis and molecular testing. Cancer Cytopathol. 2015;123(5):318–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mehmood S, Jahan A, Loya A, Yusuf MA. Onsite cytopathology evaluation and ancillary studies beneficial in EUS-FNA of pancreatic, mediastinal, intra-abdominal, and submucosal lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015;43(4):278–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohanty SK, Pradhan D, Sharma S, Sharma A, Patnaik N, Feuerman M, Bonasara R, Boyd A, Friedel D, Stavropoulos S, Gupta M. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration: what variables influence diagnostic yield? Diagn Cytopathol. 2018;46(4):293–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearson LN, Layfield LJ, Schmidt RL. Cost-effectiveness of rapid on-site evaluation of the adequacy of FNA cytology samples performed by nonpathologists. Cancer Cytopathol. 2018;126(10):839–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stevenson T, Powari M, Bowles C. Evolution of a rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) service for endobronchial ultrasound guided (EBUS) fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in a UK Hospital: a 7 year audit. Diagn Cytopathol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.23967. [Epub ahead of print].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt RL, Witt BL, Lopez-Calderon LE, Layfield LJ. The influence of rapid onsite evaluation on the adequacy rate of fine-needle aspiration cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;139(3):300–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kappelle WFW, Van Leerdam ME, Schwartz MP, Bülbül M, Buikhuisen WA, Brink MA, Sie-Go DMDS, Pullens HJM, Nikolakopoulos S, Van Diest PJ, Leenders M, Moons LMG, Bogte A, Siersema PD, Vleggaar FP. Rapid on-site evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes does not increase diagnostic yield: a randomized, multicenter trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113(5):677–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Agarwal R. Impact of rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSE) on the diagnostic yield of transbronchial needle aspiration during mediastinal lymph node sampling: systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2018;153(4):929–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid. 2017;27(11):1341–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alsharif M, Andrade RS, Groth SS, Stelow EB, Pambuccian SE. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine-needle aspiration: the University of Minnesota experience, with emphasis on usefulness, adequacy assessment, and diagnostic difficulties. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130(3):434–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nayak A, Sugrue C, Koenig S, Wasserman PG, Hoda S, Morgenstern NJ. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirate (EBUS-TBNA): a proposal for on-site adequacy criteria. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012;40(2):128–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Karunamurthy A, Cai G, Dacic S, Khalbuss WE, Pantanowitz L, Monaco SE. Evaluation of endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations (EBUS-FNA): correlation with adequacy and histologic follow-up. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122(1):23–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi SM, Lee AR, Choe JY, Nam SJ, Chung DH, Lee J, Lee CH, Lee SM, Yim JJ, Yoo CG, Kim YW, Han SK, Park YS. Adequacy criteria of rapid on-site evaluation for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a simple algorithm to assess the adequacy of ROSE. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(2):444–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Olson MT, Ali SZ. Cytotechnologist on-site evaluation of pancreas fine needle aspiration adequacy: comparison with cytopathologists and correlation with the final interpretation. Acta Cytol. 2012;56(4):340–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bonifazi M, Sediari M, Ferretti M, Poidomani G, Tramacere I, Mei F, Zuccatosta L, Gasparini S. The role of the pulmonologist in rapid on-site cytologic evaluation of transbronchial needle aspiration: a prospective study. Chest. 2014;145(1):60–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Jhala N, Chhieng D, Jhala D, Crowe DR, Eltoum IA. Agreement between rapid onsite and final cytologic interpretations of EUS-guided FNA specimens: implications for the endosonographer and patient management. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(12):2841–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fassina A, Corradin M, Zardo D, Cappellesso R, Corbetti F, Fassan M. Role and accuracy of rapid on-site evaluation of CT-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of lung nodules. Cytopathology. 2011;22(5):306–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wangsiricharoen S, Lekawanvijit S, Rangdaeng S. Agreement between rapid on-site evaluation and the final cytological diagnosis of salivary gland specimens. Cytopathology. 2017;28(4):321–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta N, Klein M, Chau K, Vadalia B, Khutti S, Gimenez C, Das K. Adequate at rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), but inadequate on final cytologic diagnosis: analysis of 606 cases of endobronchial ultrasound-guided trans bronchial needle aspirations (EBUS-TBNA). Diagn Cytopathol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24121. [Epub ahead of print].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jhala NC, Jhala DN, Chhieng DC, Eloubeidi MA, Eltoum IA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. A cytopathologist’s perspective. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120(3):351–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chang KJ, Albers CG, Erickson RA, Butler JA, Wuerker RB, Lin F. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89(2):263–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jeffus SK, Joiner AK, Siegel ER, Massoll NA, Meena N, Chen C, Post SR, Bartter T. Rapid on-site evaluation of EBUS-TBNA specimens of lymph nodes: comparative analysis and recommendations for standardization. Cancer Cytopathol. 2015;123(6):362–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams DB, Sahai AV, Aabakken L, Penman ID, van Velse A, Webb J, Wilson M, Hoffman BJ, Hawes RH. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience. Gut. 1999;44(5):720–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jhala NC, Jhala D, Eltoum I, Vickers SM, Wilcox CM, Chhieng DC, Eloubeidi MA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a powerful tool to obtain samples from small lesions. Cancer. 2004;102(4):239–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gress FG, Hawes RH, Savides TJ, Ikenberry SO, Lehman GA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy using linear array and radial scanning endosonography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;45(3):243–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shin HJ, Lahoti S, Sneige N. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in 179 cases: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2002;296(3):174–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE, Waxman I. Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(6):1289–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Chang KJ, Wiersema LM. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(4):1087–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bentz JS, Kochman ML, Faigel DO, Ginsberg GG, Smith DB, Gupta PK. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided real-time fine-needle aspiration: clinicopathologic features of 60 patients. Diagn Cytopathol. 1998;18(2):98–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chang KJ, Nguyen P, Erickson RA, Durbin TE, Katz KD. The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;45(5):387–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Crowe DR, Eloubeidi MA, Chhieng DC, Jhala NC, Jhala D, Eltoum IA. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of hepatic lesions: computerized tomographic-guided versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA. Cancer. 2006;108(3):180–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jiang D, Zang Y, Jiang D, Zhang X, Zhao C. Value of rapid on-site evaluation for ultrasound-guided thyroid fine needle aspiration. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(2):626–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Anila KR, Nayak N, Venugopal M, Jayasree K. Role of rapid on-site evaluation in CT-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of lung nodules. J Cytol. 2018;35(4):229–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Ali S, Hawes RH, Kadkhodayan K, Rafiq E, Navaneethan U, Bang JY, Varadarajulu S, Hasan MK. Utility of rapid onsite evaluation of touch imprint cytology from endoscopic and cholangioscopic forceps biopsy sampling (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(2):340–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.050. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Adeniran AJ, Al-Ahmadie H, Iyengar P, Reuter VE, Lin O. Fine needle aspiration of renal cortical lesions in adults. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;38(10):710–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Singhi AD, Zeh HJ, Brand RE, Nikiforova MN, Chennat JS, Fasanella KE, Khalid A, Papachristou GI, Slivka A, Hogg M, Lee KK, Tsung A, Zureikat AH, McGrath K. American Gastroenterological Association guidelines are inaccurate in detecting pancreatic cysts with advanced neoplasia: a clinicopathologic study of 225 patients with supporting molecular data. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(6):1107–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Okasha HH, Ashry M, Imam HM, Ezzat R, Naguib M, Farag AH, Gemeie EH, Khattab HM. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of cystic pancreatic lesions. Endosc Ultrasound. 2015;4(2):132–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Lin O, Rudomina D, Feratovic R, Sirintrapun SJ. Rapid on-site evaluation using telecytology: a major cancer center experience. Diagn Cytopathol. 2019;47(1):15–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

    Guoping Cai & Adebowale J. Adeniran

Authors
  1. Guoping Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adebowale J. Adeniran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoping Cai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

    Guoping Cai

  2. Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

    Adebowale J. Adeniran

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cai, G., Adeniran, A.J. (2019). Overview. In: Cai, G., Adeniran, A. (eds) Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21799-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21799-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21798-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21799-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation