Advertisement

The Live Cinema Paradox: Continuity and Innovation in Live Film Broadcast, Exhibition and Production

Chapter

Abstract

While a great deal of very valuable and influential scholarship has examined the disruptions caused by digital film distribution (the pre-recorded non-live formats of on-demand, streaming services for instance), this chapter focuses instead on the phenomena of live and experiential film broadcast, exhibition and production, and their growing prominence in the global film exhibition economy. Since the mid-2000s there have been significant shifts in the production, broadcast and exhibition of cinema, wherein the emergence of live experiences and practices which simultaneously seek to fully exploit the capabilities of emergent broadcast and production technologies, whilst working in potential opposition to those same technologies to evolve and offer experiential, non-mediatised, community-based and authentic engagements with film, can be seen. This chapter describes these forms and practices as live cinema, a potentially oxymoronic formulation due the historic specificity of definitions of cinema in relation to the mediatised and representational technologies upon which it is founded. Its conceptualisation of live cinema forms and practices spans three interrelated trajectories: live cinema broadcast, live cinema exhibition and live cinema production. Each of these has distinctive formal qualities, aesthetics and economies. This chapter takes each of these forms in turn as a gateway towards new understandings of contemporary modes of film circulation and consumption.

References

  1. Atkinson, S. (2017, November). ‘You Sure That’s a Film, Man?’ Audience Anticipation, Expectation and Engagement in Lost in London LIVE. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 14(12), 697–713.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, S. (2018). Synchronic Simulacinematics: The Live Performance of Film Production. In L. Feiersinger, K. Friedrich, & M. Queisner (Eds.), Image Action Space: Situating the Screen in Visual Practice (pp. 191–201). Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, S., & Kennedy, H. W. (2016). From Conflict to Revolution: The Secret Aesthetic and Narrative Spatialisation in Immersive Cinema Experience Design. Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 13(1), 252–279.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, S., & Kennedy, H. W. (2017, January 12). Live Cinema Conference Report. Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media. [online] http://www.alphavillejournal.com/Issue12/12_2Report_AtkinsonKennedy.pdf
  5. Atkinson, S., & Kennedy, H. W. (Eds.). (2018). Live Cinema: Cultures, Economies, Aesthetics. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  6. Attard, J. (2018). Opera Virgins Project: Operatic Event Cinema as a New Cultural Experience. In S. Atkinson & H. W. Kennedy (Eds.), Live Cinema: Cultures, Economies, Aesthetics (pp. 139–152). New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  7. Auslander, P. (2008). Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barker, M. (2012). Live to Your Local Cinema: The Remarkable Rise of Livecasting. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Cochrane, B., & Bonner, F. (2014). Screening from the Met, the NT or the House: What Changes with the Live Relay. Adaptation, 7(2), 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cochrane, B., & Lawrence, A. (2012). Picture This: NT Live or Not. In International Federation of Theatre Research, Santiago, Chile, 22–28 July 2012.Google Scholar
  11. Coppola, F. F. (2017). Live Cinema and Its Techniques. London: W.W. Norton & Company Ltd.Google Scholar
  12. Cruikshanks, L. (2016). Pompeii Live: Performing Objects. Museum & Society, 14(3), 446–455, [online]. http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/museumstudies/museumsociety/documents/volumes/cruickshanksu. Accessed 30 Oct 2017.
  13. Franklin, H. B. (1927). Motion Picture Theater Management. New York: Doran.Google Scholar
  14. Haswell, J. (2017, June 16). Panel Discussion: Opera Cinema, the Modern Gesamtkunstwerk? At Opera Cinema: A New Cultural Experience? Symposium, King’s College, London.Google Scholar
  15. Heyer, P. (2008). Live from the Met: Digital Broadcast Cinema, Medium Theory, and Opera for the Masses. Canadian Journal of Communication, 33, 591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahn, D. (2011). Prelude to Live Cinema. Journal of Visual Culture, 10(2), 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kennedy, H. W. (2017, November). “Join a Cast of 1000s, to Sing and Dance in the Revolution”: The Secret Cinema “Activist” Brand and the Commodification of Affect Within “Experience Communities”. Participations, 14(2), 682–696.Google Scholar
  18. Marchessault, J., & Lord, S. (2008). Fluid Screens, Expanded Cinema. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pine, J. B., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre and Every Business a Stage. Brighton: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rinderman, R. (2018, April 18). Game On! Cinemas are Exploring the Wide World of eSports. Film Journal International. http://www.filmjournal.com/features/game-cinemas-are-exploring-wide-world-esports. Accessed 27 Sept 2018.
  21. Saenz, M. (1994). Television Viewing as a Cultural Practice. In H. Newcomb (Ed.), Television: The Critical View. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Shatnoff, J. (1967). Expo 67: A Multiple Vision. Film Quarterly, 21(1), 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Es, K. (2016). The Future of Live. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations