• Andrew StablesEmail author
Part of the Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress book series (NAHP, volume 10)




  1. Daniels, Harry, Andrew Stables, Hau Ming Tse, and Sarah Cox. 2019. School design matters: relating school environments to the practice and experience of teaching and learning. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. DePoe, John M. undated. Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed 2 Jan 2019 from
  3. Kirschner, David, and James A. Whitson (eds.). 1997. Situated cognition: Social, semiotic and psychological perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Koopman, Colin. 2009. Pragmatism as transition: Historicity and hope in James, Dewey and Rorty. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Law, John. 2008. Actor-network theory and material semiotics. In The New Blackwell Companion to social theory, 3rd ed, ed. Bryan S. Turner, 141–158. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Plato. undated. Meno. Accessed 1 Jan 2019 from
  7. Sebeok, Thomas. 2001. Biosemiotics. In The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, ed. P. Cobley, 163–164. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Stables, Andrew. 2006a. Living and learning as semiotic engagement: A new theory of education. New York: Mellen.Google Scholar
  9. Stables, Andrew. 2006b. From semiosis to social policy: The less trodden path. Sign Systems Studies 34 (1): 121–134.Google Scholar
  10. Stables, Andrew. 2009. School as imagined community in discursive space: A perspective on the school effectiveness debate. In Knowledge, values and educational policy: A critical perspective, ed. H. Daniels, H. Lauder, and J. Porter, 253–261. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Stables, Andrew. 2011. Childhood and the philosophy of education: An anti-aristotelian perspective. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Stables, Andrew. 2012. Be(com)ing human: Semiosis and the myth of reason. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stables, Andrew. 2013. Semiotics as philosophy for education: From concepts to signs. In Interaction in educational domains (Papers from the Finnish educational research conference 2012), ed. K. Tirri and E. Kuusisto, 37–49. Sense: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  14. Stables, Andrew, Winfried Nöth, Alin Olteanu, Sebastien Pesce, and Eetu Pikkarainen. 2018. Semiotic theory of learning: New perspectives in philosophy of education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing social semiotics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.(emeritus), University of RoehamptonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations