Advertisement

Teaching Quality of Life in Political Science

  • Takashi InoguchiEmail author
Chapter
  • 177 Downloads
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 79)

Abstract

Quality of life studies is inherently multi-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary. After all, human life is deeply associated with human daily activities which require knowledge-widening and deepening endeavor in physical, medical, psychological, sociological, political, economic, international, philosophical and ethical sciences. This chapter describes how political science courses on quality of life may be organized with a syllabus suggested and with topics and analytic methods summarized on the basis of some of my own recent publications. The chapter consists of six sections: (1) people’s satisfaction with daily life (QOL and daily life satisfaction), (2) people’s approval of government conducts especially economic policy (QOL and government economic policy), (3) parents’ propensity to nurture their children norms and values (QOL and culture values and norms), (4) QOL and confidence in institutions, (5) QOL-based societal profiling or typology of Asian societies, and (6) Applying QOL studies in Sustainable Development Goals (health, education and income in East Asia).

References

  1. Blondel, J., & Inoguchi, T. (2006). Political cultures in Asia and Europe. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, C., & Campbell, T., II. (2016). The China study: Revised and expanded edition: The most comprehensive study of nutrition ever conducted and the startling implications for diet, weight loss, and long-term health. Dallas: BenBella Books.Google Scholar
  3. Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat [Updated and expanded]: A brief history of the twenty-first century. Farrar Straus & Giroux. Expanded, Updated Edn.Google Scholar
  4. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Inoguchi, T. (1979). Political surfing over economic waves: A simple model of the Japanese political economic system in comparative perspective. Presented at the world congress of the international political science association, Moscow, 1979. 8.12–18.Google Scholar
  6. Inoguchi, T. (2010). Post-modernity and multiple modernities as discourse of quality of life. Presented at the inaugural meeting of the Asian social research association, November 4–5, 2010, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  7. Inoguchi, T. (2012). Voters swing, and swing away soon. Asian Survey, 53(1), 184–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Inoguchi, T., & Blondel, J. (2008). Citizens and the state: Attitudes in Western Europe and East and Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Inoguchi, T., & Fujii, S. (2013). The quality of life in Asia: A comparison of quality of life in Asia. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Inoguchi, T., & Le, L. T. Q. (2019). The development of global legislative politics: Rousseau and Locke Writ Global. Springer. (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
  11. Inoguchi, T., & Marsh, I. (Eds.). (2008). Globalization, public opinion and the state: Western Europe and East and Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Inoguchi, T., & Tokuda, Y. (Eds.). (2017). Trust with Asian characteristics: Interpersonal and institutional (pp. 169–175). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Inoguchi, T., et al. (2014). Daily life satisfaction in Asia: A cross-national survey in twelve societies. Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research, 1(3), 153–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iwai, N., et al. (2009). East Asian views of family in graphs. Kyoto: Nakanishiya shuppan.Google Scholar
  15. Iwai, N., et al. (2011). East Asian cultures and values in graphs. Kyoto: Nakanishiya shuppan.Google Scholar
  16. Iwai, N., et al. (2013). East Asian health and society in graphs. Kyoto: Nakanishiya shuppan.Google Scholar
  17. Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 40(4), 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Putnam, R., & Farr, S. (2000). Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Stiglitz, J. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: W. H. Norton.Google Scholar
  20. Whiteley, P. (2011). Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world. Party Politics, 17(1), 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Asian CulturesJ.F. Oberlin UniversityMachidaJapan
  2. 2.University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations