Online Education and Quality of Life: Universidad de Palermo as a Model of Innovation in Latin America

  • Matías PopovskyEmail author
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 79)


We are living in a time full of challenges as the Fourth Industrial Revolution unfolds at an unprecedented pace, in an interconnected world which has changed the way we work, the way we communicate, and education can’t be an exception. The boundaries between the physical and digital worlds are becoming more and more blurred, and the convergence of online and face-to-face interaction is becoming ever more evident, with machine learning and artificial intelligence applied to everyday life. Technology is changing the world, and universities must not only adapt to this reality but also innovate and take advantage of it, in order to offer more and better quality education to an increasingly diverse audience, furthering and spreading knowledge. Online education means conducting a course (or more) partially or entirely through the internet. It is also referred to as eLearning (electronic learning). It is a form of distance education (Ko S, Rossen S, Teaching online. A practical guide. Routledge, Chicago, 2008). Students that opt for online learning state that it enhances their quality of life. This is not only the case of students participating in distance learning, but also of those taking blended courses (the majority of students). Many combine on campus and online studies based on their professional and personal schedules. They acquire different abilities in each of these modalities and achieve a better balance among their multiple responsibilities (academic, family, professional and social commitments). This chapter aims to discuss three important issues: the historical context of the education paradigm shift in which this experience is embedded, the educational model for online courses and degree programs at Universidad de Palermo, and a proposal to teach quality of life within the framework of this pedagogical model.


Online education Quality of life Higher education 


  1. Anand, B. (2016). The content trap. A strategist’s guide to digital change. New York: Random House, Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Anand, B., Hammond, J., Narayanan, V.G. (2015). What harvard business school has learned about online collaboration From HBX. Harvard Business Review. April 14, 2015. Retrieved January 29, 2019, from
  3. Bloom, B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: D McKay Company.Google Scholar
  4. Duderstadt, J. (2001, May 31) The future of the university in the digital age. The Glion Conference, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  5. Einstein, A. (1931). Cosmic religion and other opinions and aphorisms. New York: Covici-Friede, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Harari, Y. (2018). 21 lessons for the 21st century. New York: Spiegel & Grau/Random House, Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
  7. Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2008). Teaching online. A practical guide. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Leung, L., & Lee, P. (2005). Multiple determinants of life quality: The roles of Internet activities, use of new media, social support and leisure activities. Telematics and Informatics, 22, 161–180. Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pink, D. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Riverhead Books, Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  10. Schwab, K. (2016). Welcome to the fourth industrial revolution. Rotman Management, 25, 19–24.Google Scholar
  11. World Economic Forum. (2018). The future of jobs report. Retrieved December 22, 2018, from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Education LabUniversidad de PalermoBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations