Advertisement

Teaching Nonviolent Economics as a Path for Achieving Quality of Life

  • Jorge GuardiolaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 79)

Abstract

This chapter presents an experience of addressing quality of life in an Economic Policy course. It should be taken into account that many economic axioms concerning selfishness, individualism, or the maximization of utility via increases in income hinder the achievement of happy lives and the design of happy societies. In this regard, this chapter firstly addresses the challenges involved in introducing quality of life into economics. It then moves on to the strategy implemented in order to introduce quality of life into the courses, a strategy based on a nonviolent conception of life and economics, following the lead of Gandhi and other pacifists. The nonviolent approach is the perspective through which quality of life is viewed, and is present throughout the whole economics course, with a particular emphasis on the violent component of the economic structure and how to satisfy human needs without using violence against others. Thirdly, several examples are introduced that illustrate to the students the violent component of economic organization and economic thought, and how quality of life can be achieved without harming others. At the personal level, the intrinsic vs. extrinsic approach to leading a happy life is presented, as well as an examination of how intrinsic values are preferable to extrinsic ones when it comes to happiness and nonviolence. As for companies, the focus is on the need for production to consider people and the environment as an end rather than a means, among other things. At the country level, there is a discussion about the quality-of-life indicators that provide a better alternative to GDP as a proxy for quality of life. This body of knowledge gives shape to the so-called Nonviolent Economics.

Keywords

Economics Quality of life Happiness Nonviolence Sustainability 

References

  1. Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., et al. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635–652.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W. (2013). Wealth and subjective well-being: Spending money on others leads to higher happiness than spending on yourself. Activities for Teaching Positive Psychology: A Guide for Instructors, 93–97.  https://doi.org/10.1037/14042-015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartolini, S. (2014). Building sustainability through greater happiness. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 25(4), 587–602.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304614559436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becchetti, L., Pelloni, A., & Rossetti, F. (2008). Relational goods, sociability, and happiness. Kyklos, 61(3), 343–363.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2008.00405.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becchetti, L., Trovato, G., & Bedoya, D. A. L. (2011). Income, relational goods and happiness. Applied Economics, 43(3), 273–290.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802570439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Binder, M., & Blankenberg, A. K. (2016). Environmental concerns, volunteering and subjective well-being: Antecedents and outcomes of environmental activism in Germany. Ecological Economics, 124, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness-income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(52), 22463–22468.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015962107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ericson, T., Kjønstad, B. G., & Barstad, A. (2014). Mindfulness and sustainability. Ecological Economics, 104, 73–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frank, B., & Schulze, G. G. (2000). Does economics make citizens corrupt? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(1), 101–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00111-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T. D., & Regan, D. T. (1996). Do economists make bad citizens? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(1), 187–192.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.10.1.187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), 159–171.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.2.159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Felber, C. (2015). Change everything: Creating an economy for the common good. Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. Galtung, J. (2004). Violence, war, and their impact: On visible and invisible effects of violence. In Polylog: Forum for intercultural philosophy, 5.Google Scholar
  14. Fuentes, N., & Rojas, M. (2001). Economic theory and subjective well-being: Mexico. Social Indicators Research, 53(3), 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guardiola, J., González-Gómez, F., García-Rubio, M. A., & Lendechy-Grajales, A. (2013). Does higher income equal higher levels of happiness in every society? The case of the Mayan people. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(1), 35.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00857.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guardiola, J., Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., & Rojas, M. (2015). Economic crisis and well-being in Europe: Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 319.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0594-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guillen-Royo, M., Guardiola, J., & Garcia-Quero, F. (2017). Sustainable development in times of economic crisis: A needs-based illustration from Granada (Spain). Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Institute of Peace and Economics. (2015). The economic cost of violence containment. (Institute of Peace and Economics). Available at: http://economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/The-Economic-Cost-of-Violence-Containment.pdf
  19. Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth. London: Earthscan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Land, K. C., & Michalos, A. C. (2018). Fifty years after the social indicators movement: Has the promise been fulfilled? Social Indicators Research, 135(3), 835–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. López Martínez, M. (2017). Noviolencia o barbarie. Dyckinson.Google Scholar
  24. Michalos, A. C. (1997). Combining social, economic and environmental indicators to measure sustainable human well-being. Social Indicators Research, 40(1–2), 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Michalos, A. C., & Zumbo, B. D. (1999). Public services and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 48(2), 125–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Patrick, D., Edwards, T., Topolski, T., & Walwick, J. (2002). Youth quality of life: A new measure incorporating the voices of adolescents. QOL Newsletter, 28, 7.Google Scholar
  27. Singer, P. (2010). The life you can save: How to do your part to end world poverty. New York: Random House Incorporated.Google Scholar
  28. Sirgy, M. J. (1998). Materialism and quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 43(3), 227–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tonon, G. (2010). La utilización de indicadores de calidad de vida para la decisión de políticas públicas. Polis Revista Latinoamericana, 9(26), 361.Google Scholar
  30. Ruskin, J. (1985). Unto this last. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  31. Suárez-Varela, M., Guardiola, J., & González-Gómez, F. (2016). Do pro-environmental behaviors and awareness contribute to improve subjective well-being? Applied Research Quality Life, 11, 429–444.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-014-9372-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future (the Brundtland Report). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de la Paz y los Conflictos, Departamento de Economía AplicadaUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations