Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Professionalism and Public Craftsmanship at Street Level

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality of Governance

Abstract

Rather than the overall quality of governance, this chapter explores quality in public professions by looking at public craftsmanship. What does it mean to be a ‘good’ public administrator according to professionals themselves? What value orientations do public professionals have toward public craftsmanship and how convergent are these? In-depth qualitative research among Dutch prison professionals (N = 18) indicates that the specific work context is paramount in identifying and prioritizing a compact set of professional values. However, understandings of how to translate these values into good craftsmanship show only marginal commonality in practice, with professionals making their own personal compilations of ideal qualities. The results call for a focus on apprehending the meaning of values in specific professional work contexts, and to move from the study of broad, predefined, and prearranged value sets to concrete articulations of values and the disparate nature of their actual application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See the work of Beck Jørgensen and Bozeman (2007) for an elaborate account of the aspects to which the “public” in public values can refer.

References

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley, P. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck Jørgensen, T., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381. http://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707300703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck Jørgensen, T., & Rutgers, M. R. (2014). Tracing public values change: A historical study of civil service job advertisements. Contemporary Readings in Law & Social Justice, 6(2), 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck Jørgensen, T., & Rutgers, M. R. (2015). Public values: Core or confusion? Introduction to the centrality and puzzlement of public values research. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014545781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bøgh Andersen, L., Beck Jørgensen, T., Kjeldsen, A. M., Pedersen, L. H., & Vrangbæk, K. (2012). Public value dimensions: Developing and testing a multi-dimensional classification. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(11), 715–728. http://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.670843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M. A. P., ‘t Hart, P., & van Twist, M. J. W. (2011). Openbaar Bestuur – Beleid, organisatie en politiek. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, G. T., O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. Journal of Applied psychology, 79(5), 730–743. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M, de Jong, W. M, & Ryan, N. (2010). Public values in Western Europe: A temporal perspective. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(1), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, S. C. (2004). Rehabilitation versus control: An organizational theory of prison management. The Prison Journal, 84(4_suppl), 92S–114S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885504269394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf, G. (2003). Tractable morality: Customer discourses of bankers, veterinarians and charity workers. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erim.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf, G., Huberts, L., & Smulders, R. (2016). Coping with public value conflicts. Administration & Society, 48(9), 1101–1127. http://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714532273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf, G., & Paanakker, H. (2015). Good governance: Performance values and procedural values in conflict. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(6), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014529361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf, G., & Van Der Wal, Z. (2008). On value differences experienced by sector switchers. Administration & Society, 40(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707311785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf, G., & Van Der Wal, Z. (2010). Managing conflicting public values: Governing with integrity and effectiveness. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(6), 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010375298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf, G., Van Doeveren, V., Reynaers, A.-M., & Van der Wal, Z. (2011). Goed bestuur als management van spanningen tussen verschillende publieke waarden. Bestuurskunde, 20(2), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiIulio, J. J. (1987). Governing prisons: A comparative study of correctional management. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DJI (Dutch Correctional Agency). (2009). Strategisch kader modernisering gevangeniswezen. Den Haag, Netherlands: Programma MGW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. (2012). Beyond the integrity paradox–towards ‘good enough’ governance? Policy Studies, 33(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2011.637324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. C. (1981). The multiple socialization of organization members. Academy of Management Review, 6(2), 309–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friese, S. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS. ti. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. J. (1997). The illusion of structure: A critique of the classical model of organization and the discretionary power of correctional officers. Criminal Justice Review, 22(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/073401689702200105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1968). On the characteristics of total institutions: Staff-inmate relationships. In D. R. Cressey (Ed.), The prison: Studies in institutional organization and change. New York, NY: Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque, M. S. (2011). Contemporary trends and dilemmas of administrative ethics in the developing world. In M. S. De Vries & P. S. Kim (Eds.), Value and virtue in public administration (pp. 169–185). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., & Nasiritousi, N. (2009). Quality of government: What you get. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 135–161. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100608-104510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberts, L. (2014). The integrity of governance: What is it, what we know, what is done and where to go. Houndmills: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jelovac, D., Van Der Wal, Z., & Jelovac, A. (2011). Business and government ethics in the “new” and “old” EU: an empirical account of public–private value congruence in Slovenia and The Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 127. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0846-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. (1994). Theories of justice and street-level discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037201

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppenjan, J., Charles, M. B., & Ryan, N. (2008). Editorial: Managing competing public values in public infrastructure projects. Public Money and Management, 28, 131–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2008.00632.x

  • Kuş Saillard, E. (2011). Systematic versus interpretive analysis with two CAQDAS packages: NVivo and MAXQDA. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A., & Arnold, H. (2004). Prisons and their moral performance: A study of values, quality, and prison life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A., Price, D., & Shefer, G. (2010). The prison officer. Abingdon: Willan Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy 30th ann. ed.: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molleman, T. (2014). Performance measurement in the Dutch prison system. Methodological guidance for public sector performance assessment. Utrecht University, Enschede, Netherlands: Ipskamp Drukker B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molleman, T., & Van der Broek, T. (2014). Understanding the links between perceived prison conditions and prison staff. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 42(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molleman, T., & van Ginneken, E. F. (2015). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between cell sharing, staff–prisoner relationships, and prisoners’ perceptions of prison quality. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(10), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14525912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldenhof, L., Postma, J., & Putters, K. (2014). On justification work: How compromising enables public managers to deal with conflicting values. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paarlberg, L. E., & Perry, J. L. (2007). Values management: Aligning employee values and organization goals. The American Review of Public Administration, 37, 387–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. L. (2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2003). The essential public manager. Philadelphia: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynaers, A.-M. (2014a). It takes two to tangle: Public-private partnerships and their impact on public values. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynaers, A.-M. (2014b). Public values in public–private partnerships. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynaers, A.-M., & Paanakker, H. (2016). To privatize or not? Addressing public values in a semiprivatized prison system. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1028637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 21(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers, M. R. (2008). Sorting out public values? On the contingency of value classification in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 30(1), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2008.11029617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers, M. R. (2015). As good as it gets? On the meaning of public value in the study of policy and management. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014525833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, M. W. (2009). Value conflict and legal reasoning in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 31(4), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806310405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenhuisen, B. (2009). Competing public values: Coping strategies in heavily regulated utility industries. Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands: Next Generation Infrastructures Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenhuisen, B., & van Eeten, M. (2008). Invisible trade-offs of public values: Inside Dutch railways. Public Money and Management, 28(3), 147–152. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2008.00636.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (2006). Value conflict and policy change. Review of Policy Research, 23(1), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00192.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trommel, W. A. (2018). Veerkrachtig bestuur: voorbij neoliberale drift en populistische kramp. Netherlands: Boom Besterkunde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tummers, L. (2013). Policy alienation and the power of professionals: Confronting new policies. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tummers, L., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal, Z. (2008). Value solidity: Differences, similarities and conflicts between the organizational values of government and business. Vrije Universiteit, Enschede, Netherlands: Ipskamp Drukkers B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal, Z. (2016). Public values research in the 21st century: Where we are, where we haven’t been, and where we should go. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1072219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal, Z., De Graaf, G., & Lasthuizen, K. (2008). What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public Administration, 86(2), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00719.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal, Z., & Huberts, L. (2008). Value solidity in government and business: Results of an empirical study on public and private sector organizational values. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(3), 264–285. http://doi.org/10.1177/0275074007309154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal, Z., Nabatchi, T., & De Graaf, G. (2015). From galaxies to universe: A cross-disciplinary review and analysis of public values publications from 1969 to 2012. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013488822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal, Z., & Van Hout, E. T. J. (2009). Is public value pluralism paramount? The intrinsic multiplicity and hybridity of public values. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal, Z., & Yang, L. (2015). Confucius meets Weber or “Managerialism takes all”? Comparing civil servant values in China and the Netherlands. International Public Management Journal, 18(3), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1030486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Thiel, S., & Van der Wal, Z. (2010). Birds of a feather? The effects of organizational value congruence on the relationship between ministries and quangos. Public Organization Review, 10(4), 377–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wart, M. (1998). Changing public sector values. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, K., & Davis, P. (2011). What is the public value of government action? Towards a (new) pragmatic approach to values questions in public endeavours. Public Administration, 89(2), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01847.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witesman, E. M., & Walters, L. C. (2015). Modeling public decision preferences using context-specific value hierarchies. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014536603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N. (2000). The challenge of good governance for the IMF and the World Bank themselves. World Development, 28(5), 823–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00156-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. (2016). Worlds apart? Worlds aligned? The perceptions and prioritizations of civil servant values among civil servants from China and The Netherlands. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1053614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., & Van der Wal, Z. (2014). Rule of morality vs. rule of law? An exploratory study of civil servant values in China and the Netherlands. Public Integrity, 16(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922160206

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Hester Paanakker

Authors
  1. Hester Paanakker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hester Paanakker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Hester Paanakker

  2. Centre for Social Research and Methods, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Adam Masters

  3. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Leo Huberts

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paanakker, H. (2020). Professionalism and Public Craftsmanship at Street Level. In: Paanakker, H., Masters, A., Huberts, L. (eds) Quality of Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21522-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation