Skip to main content

The Future of University Internationalization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Measuring University Internationalization

Abstract

The final chapter concludes the project and examines university internationalization’s future. Yuan argues that if university internationalization indeed has a future, it must shift its focus from structural to cultural diversity to fulfill higher education institutions’ cultural mission. In addition, Yuan points out the uncertainties that cloud the future of university internationalization and common challenges in achieving meaningful internationalization that face universities in all countries, such as international students’ learning experiences and outcomes, the conflicts between an international profile and national identity, and internationalization’s influences on social equity. The chapter concludes with a reflection on better performance measures for universities, which highlights that the fundamental difficulty in measuring a complex phenomenon rests in capturing the outcomes rather than the activities’ input and output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    British Council. (2014). Integration of international students. A UK perspective. Available at http://www.britishcouncil.org/education/ihe/knowledge-centre/student-mobility/report-integration-internationalstudents.

  2. 2.

    This study has not been published yet, and the data currently are available only to the project members.

References

  • Alach, Z. (2017). The use of performance measurement in universities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2016-0089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmar, C. (2005). Politicising student difference: The Muslim experience. In M. Tight (Ed.), International relations (pp. 129–157). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, P., Gourlay, L. J., & Gannon-Leary, P. (2010). International students in the higher education classroom: Initial findings from staff at two post-92 universities in the UK. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(4), 475–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. K. K. (2008). Revisiting post-colonial education development: Reflections on some critical issues. In M. Marson (Ed.), Comparative education bulletin: Special issue: Education and development in post-colonial societies (pp. 21–36). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Society of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chankseliani, M. (2018). Four rationales of HE internationalization: Perspectives of U.K. universities on attracting students from former Soviet countries. Journal of Studies in International Education, 22(1), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G.-M., & Starosta, W. J. (1997, January). A review of the concept of intercultural sensitivity. Human Communication, 1, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C.-Y., Lonner, W. J., Matsumoto, D., & Ward, C. (2013). Cross-cultural competence: Theory, research, and application. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(6), 843–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113493716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K. C. (2010). ‘Weep for Chinese university’: A case study of English hegemony and academic capitalism in higher education in Hong Kong. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, W. (2004). A diversity case gold mine: The affirmative action amicus briefs. Diversity Factor, 12(1), 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, B. (2008). The performance-based research fund: Research assessment and funding in New Zealand. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(2), 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fei, X.-T. (2015). Globalization and cultural self-awareness. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, G. (2011). Performance management in education: Milestone or millstone? Management in Education, 25(5), 112–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, P. L. (2013). Issues surrounding English, the internationalisation of higher education and national cultural identity in Asia: A focus on Japan. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 160–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, N. M. (2017). Beyond ‘export education’: Aspiring to put students at the heart of a university’s internationalisation strategy. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 21(4), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2017.1286399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson-King, D., & Kaleta, J. A. (2000). Learning about social diversity: The undergraduate experience and intergroup tolerance. Journal of Higher Education, 71(2), 142–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertig, H. P. (2016). Universities, rankings and the dynamics of global higher education: Perspectives from Asia, Europe and North America. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, K.-M., & Kallio, T. J. (2014). Management-by-results and performance measurement in universities—Implications for work motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 574–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, K.-M., Kallio, T. J., & Grossi, G. (2017). Performance measurement in universities: Ambiguities in the use of quality versus quantity in performance indicators. Public Money & Management, 37(4), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1295735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B., & de Wit, H. (2005). Internationalisation in higher education: European responses to the global perspective. Amsterdam: European Association for International Education (EAIE) and European Association for Institutional Research (EAIR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. (2005). Internationalisation of higher education in South Korea: Reality, rhetoric, and disparity in academic culture and identities. Australian Journal of Education, 49(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (1997). Internationalisation of higher education: A conceptual framework. In J. Knight & H. de Wit (Eds.), Internationalisation of higher education in Asia Pacific countries (pp. 5–19). Amsterdam: EAIE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudo, K., Volet, S., & Whitsed, C. (2017). Thematic review: Intercultural relationship development at university: A systematic literature review from an ecological and person-in-context perspective. Educational Research Review, 20, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, S.-M. (1921/1990). Substance of Chinese culture (SUBS-CC). In S. B. Zhang (Ed.), Liang Shuming quanji [Collections of Liang Shuming] (pp. 3–16). Jinan: Shandong People’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2004). Don’t leave me hanging on the Anglophone. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(2/3), 74–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marope, P. T. M., & Wells, P. J. (2013). University rankings: The many sides of the debate. In P. T. M. Marope, P. J. Wells, & E. Hazelkorn (Eds.), Rankings and accountability in higher education: Uses and misuses (pp. 7–19). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell, S. (2003). Goals versus institutions: The development of performance measurement in the Swedish university sector. Management Accounting Research, 14(4), 333–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R. (2007). Higher education as a global commodity: The perils and promises for developing countries. London: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2017). Education at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2017-en.

  • Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rautiainen, A., & Järvenpää, M. (2012). Institutional logics and responses to performance measurement systems. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(2), 164–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2014). Redefining academic mobility: From the pursuit of scholarship to the pursuit of revenue. In A. Maldonado-Maldonado & R. M. Basset (Eds.), The forefront of international higher education: A Festschrift in Honor of Philip G. Altbach (pp. 115–126). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, S., Lipset, S. M., & Nevitte, N. (2003). Racial diversity reconsidered. Public Interest, 151(Spring), 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. (2005). Universities and the knowledge economy. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 43(3), 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. (2015). Dynamics of academic mobility: Hegemonic internationalisation or fluid globalisation. European Review, 23(1), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segall, M. H., Dansen, P. R., Berry, J. W., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1990). Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. (2011). Learning from China to internationalise Australian research education: Pedagogies of intellectual equality, ‘optimal ignorance’ and the ERA journal rankings. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(4), 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Oatey, H., & Dauber, D. (2015). How internationalised is your university? From structural indicators to an agenda for integration (GlobalPAD Working Papers). Available at GlobalPAD Open House. http://www.warwick.ac.uk/globalpadintercultural.

  • Teichler, U. (2009). Student mobility and staff mobility in the European higher education area beyond 2010. In B. K. Kehm, J. Huisman, & B. Stensaker (Eds.), The European higher education area: Perspectives on a moving target (pp. 183–201). Rotterdam and Taipei: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2017). Internationalisation trends in higher education and changing role of international student mobility. Journal of International Mobility, 2015(1), 177–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wächter, B. (2008). Mobility and cooperation in the European higher education area. In K. Maria (Ed.), Beyond 2010: Priorities and challenges for higher education in the New Decade (pp. 13–42). Bonn: Lemmens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Harding, R., & Mai, L.-W. (2012). Impact of cultural exposure on young Chinese students’ adaptation in a UK business school. Studies in Higher Education, 37(5), 621–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, T. E., & Sherman, M. J. (2001). Is campus racial diversity correlated with educational benefits? Academic Questions, 14(3), 72–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (2011). Self and other in the Confucian cultural context: Implications of China’s higher education development for comparative studies. Springer Science + Business Media B.V. Retrieved from http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv49014.

  • Yonezawa, A., Kitamura, Y., Meerman, A., & Kuroda, K. (2014). Emerging international dimensions in east Asian higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yonezawa, A., & Shimmi, Y. (2015). Transformation of university governance through internationalization: Challenges for top universities and government policies in Japan. Higher Education, 70(2), 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., & Moskal, M. (2018). Missing intercultural engagements in the university experiences of Chinese international students in the UK. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1448259.

  • Yvonne, A., Lynne, M. H., & Nazneen, M. (1997). Ending the international-domestic dichotomy: New approaches to a global curriculum for the millennium. Journal of Social Work Education, 33(2), 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gao, C.Y. (2019). The Future of University Internationalization. In: Measuring University Internationalization. Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21465-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21465-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21464-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21465-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics