Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Measuring University Internationalization pp 73–110Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Measuring University Internationalization

Part of the Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education book series (PSGHE)

Abstract

Developing measurements for university internationalization is a challenging task. Fortunately, predecessors’ endeavors simplified this task significantly. This chapter provides a detailed analysis of the existing tools used to assess university internationalization performance, and shows these tools’ similarities and differences in the focused national context, their purpose, unit of measurement, and methods of data collection. Further, Yuan identifies the common dimensions and components of university internationalization the existing instruments capture and summarizes all indicators available currently. By doing so, the existing indicators’ advantages and shortcomings as preferred performance measurements are presented vividly. This chapter lays the foundation for developing the new indicator set in this project.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mestenhauser (2002) uses a system perspective to portray several key learning domains of international education and ‘perspectives’ through which the domains can be examined. The learning domains are composed of international studies and relations; area studies; foreign languages; international dimensions of academic disciplines; educational exchanges; development contracts and interuniversity agreements; and organizations, administration, policy, governance, and financing. By combining these learning domains and variables relevant to research universities, Horn et al. (2007) result with five rubrics: student characteristics, scholar characteristics, the international research orientation, curriculum content, and organizational support.

  2. 2.

    Since the mid-1980s, educational indicators have been a priority on education and policy agenda. Considerable theoretical work and empirical studies have been done in efforts to develop reliable and useful educational indicators at state, national, and international levels (Ogawa & Collom, 1998; Tuijnman & Bottani, 1994; Wyatt, 1994). International interest in educational indicators has been driven by the concerns on expanding the enrollment capacity of education system while simultaneously improving the quality of education. Policymakers realized that these goals set high demands on policy analysis and, accordingly, that the comparative knowledge base in education was in need of improvement (Tuijnman & Bottani, 1994). In this circumstance, various educational indicators were developed to serve measurement and evaluation purposes.

  3. 3.

    The policy-relevant purposes that indicators serve imply that the selection of a set of indicators should base on an understanding of which components of the system are critical to its health and which features signal important changes in its condition (Dickson & Lim, 1991; Gaither, 1994; Oakes, 1986).

  4. 4.

    It is interesting to notice that even in the initial phase of educational indicators development, efforts (e.g., OECD, 1992) were made to establish a cross-national system for comparisons.

References

  • Aerden, A., & Weber, M. (2013). Frameworks for the assessment of quality in internationalisation (Occasional Paper). Certificate for Quality in Internationalisation: European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education (ECA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoubi, R. M., & Massoud, H. K. (2007). The strategy of internationalization in universities: A quantitative evaluation of the intent and implementation in UK universities. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(4), 329–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barre, R. (2001). Sense and nonsense of S&T productivity indicators. Science and Public Policy, 28(4), 259–266.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beerkens, E., Brandenburg, U., Evers, N., van Gaalen, A., Leichsenring, H., & Zimmermann, V. (2010). Indicator projects on internationalisation: Approaches, methods and findings (A report in the context of the European project ‘indicators for mapping & profiling internationalisation’ (IMPI)). Gütersloh: CHE Consult GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. K. (1993). Developing a system of education indicators: Selecting, implementing, and reporting indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(1), 65–80.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bottani, N. (1996). OECD international education indicators. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(3), 279–288.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bottani, N., Delfau, I., Hutmacher, W., & Desmond, N. (1991). Lessons gained from the OECD/CERI international educational indicators project. In J. Hewton (Ed.), Performance indicators in education: What can they tell us? (pp. 35–42). Brisbane: Australian Conference of Directors-General of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G. (1995). School performance indicators and school effectiveness: The conceptions and the critiques (Working Papers in Education). Wolverhampton, UK: University of Wolverhampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, U., & Federkeil, G. (2007). How to measure internationality and internationalisation of higher education institutions! Indicators and key figures. Gütersloh: Centre for Higher Education Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Hermanson, K. L. (1993). Educational indicator systems: Observations on their structure, interpretation, and use. Review of Research in Education, 19(1), 451–484.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. C., & Freeman, T. M. (1997). Performance indicators at SUNY and in New York: Where have we been? Where are we going? Assessment Update, 9(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-G., Zeng, M.-C., Wen, D.-M., Weng, L.-X., & Yu, Z. (2009). The establishment of indicator system for the evaluation of internationalisation of research universities in China. Peking University Education Review, 7(4), 116–135 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J.-K. (2008). Internationalization indicators for universities of technology (Unpublished PhD thesis). http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgibin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22097NTNU5037005%22.&searchmode=basic.

  • Chin, J. M.-C., & Ching, G. S. (2009). Trends and indicators of Taiwan’s higher education internationalization. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2), 185–203.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, W. W. (1992). Educational indicators for Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania educational policy studies. Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Research Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuttance, P. (1994). Monitoring educational quality through performance indicators for school practice. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 5(2), 101–126.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • DAAD. (2010). Internationality at German universities: Concepts and collecting profile data. German: German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, H. (2011). Law of the stimulative arrears? In H. de Wit (Ed.), Trends, issues and challenges in internationalisation of higher education (pp. 7–23). Amsterdam: Centre for Applied Research on Economics and Management Hogeschool van Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, G. S., & Lim, S. (1991). The development and use of indicators of performance in educational leadership. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Cardiff, Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. T., & Jones, D. P. (1994). Pointing the way: Indicators as policy tools in higher education. In S. Rupert (Ed.), Charting higher education accountability: A sourcebook on state-level performance indicators (pp. 6–16). Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, G. (2011). Performance management in education: Milestone or millstone? Management in Education, 25(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020610383902.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, B. (2014). Benchmarking Australian and New Zealand university meta-policy in an increasingly regulated tertiary environment. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2013.861050.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Furushiro, N. (2006). Developing evaluation criteria to assess the internationalization of universities (Final Report Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research). Osaka: Osaka University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaither, G. (1994). Measuring up: The promises and pitfalls of performance indicators in higher education (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5). Washington, DC: George Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajowniczek, J., & Schlabs, T. (2013). International medical school label methodology. Retrieved 20 May 2014, from http://www.ims-2020.eu/downloads/FC_IMS_label_methodology.pdf.

  • Gray, J. (1990). The quality of schooling: Frameworks for judgement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 38(3), 204–223.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J., & Wilcox, B. (1994). Performance indicators: Flourish or perish. In K. A. Riley & D. Nuttall (Eds.), Measuring quality: Education indicators-United Kingdom and international perspectives (pp. 69–86). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. F. (2005). Measuring internationalization at research universities. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. F. (2012). Measuring and assessing internationalization. Retrieved 21 June 2014, from http://www.nafsa.org/uploadedFiles/NAFSA_Home/Resource_Library_Assets/Publications_Library/MeasuringandAssessingInternationalization.pdf.

  • Horn, A. S., Hendel, D. D., & Fry, G. W. (2007). Ranking the international dimension of top research universities in the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 330–358.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • James, R. (2003). Suggestions relative to the selection of strategic system-level indicators to review the development of higher education. In A. Yonezawa & F. Kaiser (Eds.), System-level and strategic indicators for monitoring higher education in the twenty-first century (pp. 219–232). Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarmo, V., & Pentti, M. (2003). The impact of culture on the use of performance measurement information in the university setting. Management Decision, 41(8), 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310496260.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jarratt, R. (1985). Report of the steering committee for efficiency studies in universities. London: Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, J., & Taylor, J. (1990). Performance indicators in higher education: UK universities. Buckingham and Bristol, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, B. W. A., & Westerheijden, D. F. (1994). Performance indicators and quality assessment in European higher education. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1994(82), 37–51.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, K.-M., & Kallio, T. J. (2014). Management-by-results and performance measurement in universities—Implications for work motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 574–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709497.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, K.-M., Kallio, T. J., & Grossi, G. (2017). Performance measurement in universities: Ambiguities in the use of quality versus quantity in performance indicators. Public Money & Management, 37(4), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1295735.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J., & de Wit, H. (1999). Quality and internationalisation in higher education/Programme on institutional management in higher education. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, K.-L., Coates, H., & James, R. (2005). Monitoring the internationalisation of higher education: Are there useful quantitative performance indicators? In M. Tight (Ed.), International relations (International perspectives on higher education research, Vol. 3, pp. 233–253). Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lashway, L. (2001). Educational indicators: ERIC digest. Eugene, OR: Eric Clearinghouse on Educational Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leask, B. (2001). Bridging the gap: Internationalizing university curricula. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5(2), 100–115.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Managing Committee of the EMQT Project. (2011). The outcomes of the EMQT project. Retrieved 20 May 2014, from http://www.emqt.org/images/stories/Outcomes_of_the_EMQT_Project_Presentation.pdf.

  • McEwen, N. (1993). Lessons from the educational quality indicators initiative. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Educational Researchers’ Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Deaton, R. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737028001001.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mestenhauser, J. A. (2002). In search of a comprehensive approach to international and global education: A systems perspective. In W. Grünzweig & N. Rinehart (Eds.), Rockin’ in red square: Critical approaches to international education in the age of cyberculture (pp. 165–213). Münster, Germany: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, D. (1994). Choosing indicators. In OECD (Ed.), Making education count: Developing and using international indicators (pp. 79–97). Paris and Washington, DC: OECD Publications and Information Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • NVAO. (2011). Frameworks for the assessment of internationalisation. Retrieved 18 June 2014, from http://www.nvao.net/page/downloads/Beoordelingskader_BKK_Internationalisation_14-11-2011.pdf.

  • Oakes, J. (1986). Educational indicators: A guide for policymakers. CPRE Occasional Paper Series. Washington, DC: Center for Policy Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1992). The OECD international education indicators: A framework for analysis. Paris and Washington, DC: OECD Publications and Information Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, R., & Collom, E. (1998). Educational indicators: What are they? How can schools and school districts use them? Riverside: University of California, California Educational Research Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D., Jaeger, M., & Schwarzenberger, A. (2007). Performance-based funding as an instrument of competition in German higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 3–23. http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjhe20.

  • Paige, R. M. (2005). Internationalization of higher education: Performance assessment and indicators. 名古屋高等教育研究, 5(8), 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, J. S. (1989). Developing useful educational indicator systems: Insights on educational policy and practice (Number 15). Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. (1988). Indicators: Objective data or political tool? Phi Delta Kappan, 69(7), 503–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. (1991). Creating a system of school process indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(1), 13–29.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, D., Ramirez, K., & Huckel, D. (2013). CIC international learning mobility benchmark (Public Report 2012). Retrieved from https://umabroad.umn.edu/assets/files/PDFs/educators/cicInternationalMobility.pdf.

  • Radnor, Z. J., & Barnes, D. (2007). Historical analysis of performance measurement and management in operations management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(5–6), 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400710757105.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, G. (2011). Internationalisation and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(5), 661–676.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (1992). Process indicators of school functioning. In OECD (Ed.), The OECD international education indicator: A framework for analysis (pp. 53–76). Paris and Washington, DC: OECD Publications and Information Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, R. W. (1985). Educational indicators: What do we need to know that we don’t know now? Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Y. (2016, November 25). The push for Asian higher education internationalisation indicators. University World News. Retrieved from http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20161123124836365.

  • Shavelson, R. J. (1991). What are educational indicators and indicator systems? Washington, DC: Eric Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L. M., & Oakes, J. (1989). Indicators for monitoring mathematics and science education: A sourcebook. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L. M., Oakes, J., & Carey, N. (1987). Indicator systems for monitoring mathematics and science education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizer, J., Spee, A., & Bormans, R. (1992). The role of performance indicators in higher education. Higher Education, 24(2), 133–155.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stecher, B. M., & Koretz, D. (1996). Issues in building an indicator system for mathematics and science education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. E., Meyerson, J. W., & Massy, W. F. (1993). Strategic indicators for higher education: improving performance. Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuijnman, A., & Bottani, N. (1994). International education indicators: framework—Development and interpretation. In OECD (Ed.), Making education count: Developing and using international indicators (pp. 21–34). Paris and Washington, DC: OECD Publications and Information Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Besselaar, P., Inzelt, A., Reale, E., de Turckheim, E., & Vercesi, V. (2012). Indicators of internationalisation for research institutions: A new approach. Retrieved from http://archives.esf.org/fileadmin/Public_documents/Publications/mof_indicators2.pdf.

  • van der Wende, M. (1996). Internationalising the curriculum in Dutch higher education: An international comparative perspective (PhD dissertation). Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gaalen, A. (2009). Developing a tool for mapping internationalisation: A case study. In H. de Wit (Ed.), Measuring success in the internationalisation of higher education (EAIE Occasional Paper No. 22, pp. 77–91). Amsterdam: European Association for International Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, A. (2002). Going global? Internationalizing Australian universities in a time of global crisis. Comparative Education Review, 46(4), 433.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, T. (1994). Education indicators: A review of the literature. In OECD (Ed.), Making education count: Developing and using international indicators (pp. 99–121). Paris and Washington, DC: OECD Publications and Information Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (1991). Performance indicators: Towards a synoptic framework. Higher Education, 21(2), 235–248.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zhivan, A. (2017). The use of performance measurement in universities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2016-0089.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for International Research on Education, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Catherine Yuan Gao

Authors
  1. Catherine Yuan Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gao, C.Y. (2019). Measuring University Internationalization. In: Measuring University Internationalization. Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21465-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21465-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21464-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21465-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

search

Navigation