Skip to main content
View expanded cover

Textbook of Male Genitourethral Reconstruction pp 727–735Cite as

Organ-Preserving Surgical Treatment of Penile Cancer and Glans Lichen Sclerosis

  • 1087 Accesses

Abstract

The majority of penile cancers are located on the distal aspect of the penis- the glans, the coronal sulcus or the prepuce. This lends penile cancer well towards an organ sparing approach. Traditionally a diagnosis of penile cancer resulted in a radical excision with greater than 2 cm surgical margin- this resulted in satisfactory oncological outcomes but significant morbidity to the patient particularly from a urinary, sexual and psychological perspective.

Numerous techniques have been described for organ preserving surgery in penile cancer- laser therapy, Mohs’ microsurgery, glans resurfacing, wide local excision, partial glansectomy, glansectomy, partial penectomy and finally as a radical penectomy after all organ sparing approaches have been exhausted. Organ preserving surgery has been shown to be oncologically safe and associated with improved functional outcomes.

Patients with penile cancer and especially those with an organ preserving approach require close follow up of their primary disease as well as inguinal and pelvic lymph nodes. Penile cancer is a rare disease and benefits from centralization to a dedicated penile cancer centre with a multidisciplinary approach.

Lichen sclerosis, or balanitis xerotica obliterans, is a chronic inflammatory process of unknown aetiology affecting the glans penis, prepuce and urethra. Lichen sclerosis affects primarily the glans penis and prepuce of uncircumcised men and presents as pale, atrophic plaques, which may coalesce and sclerose, causing phimosis and meatal stenosis.

Primarily, patients with lichen sclerosis can be treated with topical agents and circumcision. Topical steroids have been shown to reduce the need for circumcision by up to 35%. Patients with persistent scaring lichen sclerosis should be referred for specialist opinion. In such patients who have extensive recurrent lichen sclerosis- organ preserving surgery such as removal of the glans epithelium (glans resurfacing) has been proven to be effective both cosmetically and functionally.

Keywords

  • Penile cancer
  • Lichen sclerosis
  • Organ-sparing
  • Organ-preserving
  • Partial
  • Penectomy

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21447-0_55
  • Chapter length: 9 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-21447-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 55.1
Fig. 55.2
Fig. 55.3
Fig. 55.4
Fig. 55.5
Fig. 55.6
Fig. 55.7
Fig. 55.8

References

  1. Hakenberg OW, Compérat EM, Minhas S, Necchi A, Protzel C, Watkin N. EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update. Eur Urol. 2015;67(1):142–50.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Christodoulidou M, Sahdev V, Houssein S, Muneer A. Epidemiology of penile cancer. Curr Probl Cancer. 2015;39(3):126–36.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Frisch M, Earp BD. Circumcision of male infants and children as a public health measure in developed countries: a critical assessment of recent evidence. Glob Public Health. 2018;13(5):626–41.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):585–6.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Morris BJ, Kennedy SE, Wodak AD, Mindel A, Golovsky D, Schrieber L, Lumbers ER, Handelsman DJ, Ziegler JB. Early infant male circumcision: systematic review, risk-benefit analysis, and progress in policy. World J Clin Pediatr. 2017;6(1):89–102.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Philippou P, Shabbir M, Malone P, Nigam R, Muneer A, Ralph DJ, Minhas S. Conservative surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: resection margins and long-term oncological control. J Urol. 2012;188(3):803–8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Samaratunga H, Zajdlewicz L, Dunglison N, Carter R, Williams S, Payton DJ, Perry-Keene J, Lavin MF, Gardiner RA. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet. 2016;388(10049):1057–66.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Samaratunga H, Zajdlewicz L, Teloken P, Dunglison N, Williams S, Lavin MF, Gardiner RA. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(8):1051–60.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Kelly F, Lonergan P, Lundon D, Nason G, Sweeney P, Cullen I, Hegarty P. A prospective study of total glans resurfacing for localized penile cancer to maximize oncologic and functional outcomes in a tertiary referral network. J Urol. 2017;197(5):1258–63.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Mahesan T, Hegarty PK, Watkin NA. Advances in penile-preserving surgical approaches in the management of penile tumors. Urol Clin North Am. 2016;43(4):427–34.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Veeratterapillay R, Sahadevan K, Aluru P, Asterling S, Rao GS, Greene D. Organ-preserving surgery for penile cancer: description of techniques and surgical outcomes. BJU Int. 2012;110(11):1792–5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis NF, Fitzgerald M, Burke JP, Breen KJ, Elamin S, Brady CM, Power DG, Hegarty PK, Sweeney P. Is there a role for the development of a supra-regional network for the management of penile cancer in the Republic of Ireland? Surgeon. 2016;14(2):82–6.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu Y, Gu WJ, Wang HK, Gu CY, Ye DW. Surgical treatment of primary disease for penile squamous cell carcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database analysis. Oncol Lett. 2015;10(1):85–92.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar P, Singh S, Goddard JC, Terry TR, Summerton DJ. The development of a supraregional network for the management of penile cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94:204–9.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Patel M, Yuminaga Y, Bang A, Lawrentschuk N, Skyring T, Smith DP. Volume-outcome relationship in penile cancer treatment: a population based patterns of care and outcomes study from Australia. BJU Int. 2016;118(Suppl 3):35–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Romero FR, Romero KR, Mattos MA, Garcia CR, Fernandes Rde C, Perez MD. Sexual function after partial penectomy for penile cancer. Urology. 2005;66(6):1292–5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Klaassen Z, Jen RP, DiBianco JM, Reinstatler L, Li Q, Madi R, Lewis RW, Smith AM, Neal DE Jr, Moses KA, Terris MK. Factors associated with suicide in patients with genitourinary malignancies. Cancer. 2015;121(11):1864–72.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Simpson WG, Klaassen Z, Jen RP, Hughes WM 5th, Neal DE Jr, Terris MK. Analysis of suicide risk in patients with penile cancer and review of the literature. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018;16(2):e257–61.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Agrawal A, Pai D, Ananthakrishnan N, Smile SR, Ratnakar C. The histological extent of the local spread of carcinoma of the penis and its therapeutic implications. BJU Int. 2000;85(3):299–301.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  20. Minhas S, Kayes O, Hegarty P, Kumar P, Freeman A, Ralph D. What surgical resection margins are required to achieve oncological control in men with primary penile cancer? BJU Int. 2005;96(7):1040–3.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Djajadiningrat RS, van Werkhoven E, Meinhardt W, van Rhijn BW, Bex A, van der Poel HG, Horenblas S. Penile sparing surgery for penile cancer-does it affect survival? J Urol. 2014;192(1):120–5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Breen KJ, O’Connor KM, Power DG, Mayer NJ, Rogers E, Sweeney P. Penile cancer – guideline adherence produces optimum results. Surgeon. 2015;13(4):200–6.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Meijer RP, Boon TA, van Venrooij GE, Wijburg CJ. Long-term follow-up after laser therapy for penile carcinoma. Urology. 2007;69(4):759–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Windahl T, Andersson SO. Combined laser treatment for penile carcinoma: results after long-term followup. J Urol. 2003;169(6):2118–21.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Leijte JA, Kirrander P, Antonini N, Windahl T, Horenblas S. Recurrence patterns of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: recommendations for follow-up based on a two-centre analysis of 700 patients. Eur Urol. 2008;54(1):161–8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. Mohs FE, Snow SN, Messing EM, Kuglitsch ME. Microscopically controlled surgery in the treatment of carcinoma of the penis. J Urol. 1985;133(6):961–6.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  27. Shindel AW, Mann MW, Lev RY, Sengelmann R, Petersen J, Hruza GJ, Brandes SB. Mohs micrographic surgery for penile cancer: management and long-term followup. J Urol. 2007;178(5):1980–5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohs FE, Snow SN, Larson PO. Mohs micrographic surgery for penile tumors. Urol Clin North Am. 1992;19(2):291–304.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  29. Hadway P, Corbishley CM, Watkin NA. Total glans resurfacing for premalignant lesions of the penis: initial outcome data. BJU Int. 2006;98(3):532–6.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  30. Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Lazzeri M, Mirri F, Barbagli G. Resurfacing and reconstruction of the glans penis. Eur Urol. 2007;52(3):893–8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith Y, Hadway P, Biedrzycki O, Perry MJ, Corbishley C, Watkin NA. Reconstructive surgery for invasive squamous carcinoma of the glans penis. Eur Urol. 2007;52(4):1179–85.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. Ornellas AA, Kinchin EW, Nóbrega BL, Wisnescky A, Koifman N, Quirino R. Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Brazilian National Cancer Institute long-term experience. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97(6):487–95.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  33. Seixas AL, Ornellas AA, Marota A, Wisnescky A, Campos F, de Moraes JR. Verrucous carcinoma of the penis: retrospective analysis of 32 cases. J Urol. 1994;152(5 Pt 1):1476–8; discussion 1478–9.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. Folaranmi SE, Corbett HJ, Losty PD. Does application of topical steroids for lichen sclerosus (balanitis xerotica obliterans) affect the rate of circumcision? A systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53:2225–7.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  35. Garaffa G, Shabbir M, Christopher N, Minhas S, Ralph DJ. The surgical management of lichen sclerosus of the glans penis: our experience and review of the literature. J Sex Med. 2011;8(4):1246–53.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. Corbishley CM, Tinwell B, Kaul A, Ayres B, Watkin NA. Glans resurfacing for precancerous and superficially invasive carcinomas of the glans penis: pathological specimen handling and reporting. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2015;32(3):232–7.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland

    Gregory Nason, Clare O’Connell & Paul Hegarty

  2. Department of Urology, Mater Private Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland

    Paul Hegarty

  3. Department of Urology, Mater Private Hospital, Cork, Ireland

    Paul Hegarty

Authors
  1. Gregory Nason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clare O’Connell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Hegarty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Nason .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

    Francisco E. Martins

  2. Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India

    Sanjay B. Kulkarni

  3. Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Tobias S. Köhler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nason, G., O’Connell, C., Hegarty, P. (2020). Organ-Preserving Surgical Treatment of Penile Cancer and Glans Lichen Sclerosis. In: Martins, F.E., Kulkarni, S.B., Köhler, T.S. (eds) Textbook of Male Genitourethral Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21447-0_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21447-0_55

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21446-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21447-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)