Advertisement

A Model for Language Annotations on the Web

  • Frances Gillis-WebberEmail author
  • Sabine TittelEmail author
  • C. Maria KeetEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1029)

Abstract

Several annotation models have been proposed to enable a multilingual Semantic Web. Such models hone in on the word and its morphology and assume the language tag and URI comes from external resources. These resources, such as ISO 639 and Glottolog, have limited coverage of the world’s languages and have a very limited thesaurus-like structure at best, which hampers language annotation, hence constraining research in Digital Humanities and other fields. To resolve this ‘outsourced’ task of the current models, we developed a model for representing information about languages, the Model for Language Annotation (MoLA), such that basic language information can be recorded consistently and therewith queried and analyzed as well. This includes the various types of languages, families, and the relations among them. MoLA is formalized in OWL so that it can integrate with Linguistic Linked Data resources. Sufficient coverage of MoLA is demonstrated with the use case of French.

Keywords

Multilingual semantic web Annotation Language model 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data (2009). https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
  3. 3.
    Berschin, H., Fernández-Sevilla, J., Felixberger, J.: Die spanische Sprache. Georg Olms Verlag, Hildesheim (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berschin, H., Goebl, H.: Französische Sprachgeschichte. Georg Olms Verlag, Hildesheim (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cardillo, E., Folino, A., Trunfio, R., Guarasci, R.: Towards the reuse of standardized thesauri into ontologies. In: Proceedings of WOP 2014. CEUR-WS, vol. 1302, pp. 26–37 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chavula, C., Maria Keet, C.: An orchestration framework for linguistic task ontologies. In: Garoufallou, E., Hartley, R.J., Gaitanou, P. (eds.) MTSR 2015. CCIS, vol. 544, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24129-6_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chiarcos, C., Sukhareva, M.: OLiA - ontologies of linguistic annotation. Semant. Web J. 6(4), 379–386 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cimiano, P., McCrae, J.P., Buitelaar, P.: Lexicon model for ontologies: community report. Final community group report, 10 May 2016, W3C (2016). https://www.w3.org/2016/05/ontolex/
  9. 9.
    Coseriu, E.: ‘Historische Sprache’ und ‘Dialekt’. In: Göschel, J. (ed.) Dialekt und Dialektologie. Ergebnisse des Internationalen Symposions “Zur Theorie des Dialekts”. Marburg/Lahn, 5–10 September 1977, pp. 106–122. Franz Steiner Verlag (1980)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crystal, D.: The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dimitrova, V., Fäth, C., Chiarcos, C., Renner-Westermann, H., Abromeit, F.: Interoperability of language-related information: mapping the BLL Thesaurus to Lexvo and Glottolog. In: Proceedings of LREC 2018, pp. 4555–4561. ELRA, Miyazaki, 7–12 May 2018Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farrar, S., Langendoen, D.T.: A linguistic ontology for the semantic web. In: GLOT International, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 97–100 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gillis-Webber, F., Keet, C.M., Tittel, S.: A model for language annotations on the web: supplementary material (2019). https://ontology.londisizwe.org/mola/article/2019-kgswc-supplementary-material
  14. 14.
    Gillis-Webber, F., Tittel, S.: The shortcomings of language tags for linked data when modelling lesser-known languages. In: Proceedings of LDK 2019, Leipzig, 20–23 May 2019 (2019)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guarino, N., Oberle, D., Staab, S.: What is an ontology? In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Halpin, T., Morgan, T.: Information Modeling and Relational Databases, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hammarström, H., Haspelmath, M., Forkel, R.: Glottolog 3.3. About languoids (2018). https://glottolog.org/glottolog/glottologinformation. Accessed 17 Feb 2019
  18. 18.
    Hellmann, S., Stadler, C., Lehmann, J.: Linked data for linguistic diversity research: Glottolog/Langdoc and ASJP online. In: Chiarcos, C., Nordhoff, S., Hellmann, S. (eds.) Linked Data in Linguistics, pp. 191–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28249-2_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keet, C.M.: An introduction to ontology engineering, Computing, vol. 20, p. 334. College Publications (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kibbee, D.: For to Speke Frenche Trewely. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klare, J.: Französische Sprachgeschichte. Klett, Stuttgart (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kless, D., Jansen, L., Lindenthal, J., Wiebensohn, J.: A method for re-engineering a thesaurus into an ontology. In: Proceedings of FOIS 2012, pp. 133–146. IOS Press (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: Ontology library. WonderWeb Deliverable D18 (version 1.0, 31–12-2003) (2003). http://wonderweb.semanticweb.org
  24. 24.
    de Melo, G.: Lexvo.org: language-related information for the linguistic linked data cloud. Semant. Web 6(4), 393–400 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miles, A., Bechhofer, S.: SKOS simple knowledge organization system reference: W3C recommendation, 18 August 2009 (2009). https://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-skos-reference-20090818/. Accessed 17 Feb 2019
  26. 26.
    Rickard, P.: A History of the French language. Hutchinson University Library, London (1974)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Simperl, E., Mochol, M., Bürger, T.: Achieving maturity: the state of practice in ontology engineering in 2009. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Appl. 7(1), 45–65 (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Soergel, D., Lauser, B., Liang, A., Fisseha, F., Keizer, J., Katz, S.: Reengineering thesauri for new applications: the AGROVOC example. J. Digit. Inf. 4(4) (2004). http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/jodi-126/111
  29. 29.
    Tittel, S., Chiarcos, C.: Historical lexicography of old french and linked open data: transforming the resources of the Dictionnaire étymologique de l’ancien français with OntoLex-Lemon. In: Proceedings of LREC 2018. GLOBALEX Workshop 2018, Miyazaki, Japan, pp. 58–66. (ELRA), Paris (2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vannini, L., Le Crosnier, H.: Net.lang. Towards the multilingual cyberspace. C & F Éditions (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Knowledge and Information StewardshipUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and HumanitiesHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations