Skip to main content

The Politics of Administrative Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reimagining Administrative Justice
  • 255 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter concludes by considering the political implications of administrative justice reimagined. It does so by returning to the centrality of relationships for administrative justice, and in particular the relationship between citizen and state. The chapter proposes that administrative justice reimagined is unavoidably implicated in the prioritisation of democratic values and equality. It finds in the Aristotelian concept of ‘political friendship’ the establishment of administrative justice as a set of ‘bridging institutions’ that are supportive of human capability, social innovation and networked governance. It proposes that the realliance of administrative justice and human rights in the small places of daily life is one way of revitalising for a new digitalised era a post-war vision of social citizenship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, M. (2003). A Socio-Legal Approach to Administrative Justice. Law and Policy, 25(4), 323–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, M. (2006). Fairness in Context. Journal of Law and Society, 33(4), 615–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. (2004). Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D., & Light, J. (Eds.). (2015). From Voice to Influence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creutzfeldt, N. (2016). A Voice for Change? Trust Relationships between Ombudsmen, Individuals and Public Service Providers. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 38, 460–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (2009). Trouble with Strangers. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, D. (2017). The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics. London: C Hurst & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertogh, M. (2013). Why the Ombudsman Does Not Promote Public Trust in Government: Lessons from the Low Countries. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 35, 245–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laverty, P., & Loach, K. (2016). I, Daniel Blake. Pontefract: Route Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Sueur, A. (2016). Robot Government: Automated Decision-Making and Its Implications for Parliament. In A. Horne & A. Le Sueur (Eds.), Parliament: Legislation and Accountability. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1992). Citizenship and Social Class. In T. H. Marshall & T. Bottomore (Eds.), Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashaw, J. (1983). Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyn, S. (2018). Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Northern Ireland Ombudsman. (2016). Human Rights Manual. Belfast: Northern Ireland Ombudsman and Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, N. (2017). Administrative Justice in the Wake of ‘I, Daniel Blake’. Political Quarterly, 89(1), 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (2018). A Question of Trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh, R. (2013, May 1). Equity Not Equality—Interview with Danielle Allen. The Guardian, p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiavone, A. (2012). The Invention of Law in the West. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2003). Respect: The Formation of Character in an Age of Inequality. New York: W W Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1961). The Long Revolution. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (2018). Rethinking Deference for Algorithmic Decision-making. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 7/2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacka, B. (2017). When the State Meets the Street: Public Service and Moral Agency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret Doyle .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Doyle, M., O’Brien, N. (2020). The Politics of Administrative Justice. In: Reimagining Administrative Justice. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21388-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics