Overview of Genomic Resources Available for Lupins with a Focus on Narrow-Leafed Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius)

Part of the Compendium of Plant Genomes book series (CPG)


Narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) is an important grain legume crop for some parts of the world like Australia and parts of Northern Europe where it can form an important part of sustainable farming systems, reducing the need for nitrogenous fertiliser, providing valuable disease breaks and boosting cereal yields. Through the genome revolution and in particular rapid advances in next-generation sequencing technologies, there are new powerful tools available to help with gene discovery and to rapidly accelerate pre-breeding and breeding programmes for narrow-leafed lupin and other lupin crops. This chapter provides an overview of the genomic resources available for narrow-leafed lupin with a focus on the current reference genome which underpins many of the other resources. The cultivar Tanjil was chosen as the reference accession for narrow-leafed lupin and a short-read sequencing approach coupled with BAC-end sequence data was used to assemble the first comprehensive reference genome for the species. This genome assembly captured ~610 Mb of the estimated 921 Mb genome of narrow-leafed lupin with an annotated gene set of 33,076 genes. The narrow-leafed lupin reference genome has provided valuable insight into narrow-leafed lupin evolution and important information on some of its key plant-microbe interactions. The chapter also touches on some of the genomic resources that are in the pipeline in lupins and describes the lupin genome portal, a web-based resource that houses genomic and related information for narrow-leafed lupin.



Narrow-leafed lupin genomic work in the authors group has been supported by Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC), CSIRO, Curtin University and the University of Western Australia.


  1. Ameline-Torregrosa C, Wang B-B, O'Bleness MS, Deshpande S, Zhu H et al (2008) Identification and characterization of nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat genes in the model plant Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol 146:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnoldi A, Boschin G, Zanoni C, Lammi C (2015) The health benefits of sweet lupin seed flours and isolated proteins. J Funct Foods 18:550–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bak RO, Gomez-Ospina N, Porteus MH (2018) Gene editing on center stage. Trends Genet 34:600–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker SJ, Si P, Hodgson L, Ferguson-Hunt M, Khentry Y et al (2016) Regeneration selection improves transformation efficiency in narrow-leaf lupin. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 126:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger JD, Clements JC, Nelson MN, Kamphuis LG, Singh KB et al (2013) The essential role of genetic resources in narrow-leafed lupin improvement. Crop Pasture Sci 64:361–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bravo A, York T, Pumplin N, Mueller LA, Harrison MJ (2016) Genes conserved for arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis identified through phylogenomics. Nat Plants 2Google Scholar
  7. Crossa J, Perez-Rodriguez P, Cuevas J, Montesinos-Lopez O, Jarquin D et al (2017) Genomic selection in plant breeding: methods, models, and perspectives. Trends Plant Sci 22:961–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeBoer K, Melser S, Sperschneider J, Kamphuis LG, Garg G et al (2019) Identification and profiling of narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) microRNAs during seed development. BMC Genomics 20Google Scholar
  9. Donlin MJ (2009) Using the generic genome browser (GBrowse). Current protocols in bioinformatics (Chap. 9: Unit 9.9-Unit 9.9)Google Scholar
  10. Drummond CS, Eastwood RJ, Miotto STS, Hughes CE (2012) Multiple continental radiations and correlates of diversification in Lupinus (Leguminosae): testing for key innovation with incomplete taxon sampling. Syst Biol 61:443–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foley RC, Jimenez-Lopez JC, Kamphuis LG, Hane JK, Melser S et al (2015) Analysis of conglutin seed storage proteins across lupin species using transcriptomic, protein and comparative genomic approaches. BMC Plant Biol 15:106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallardo C, Hufnagel B, Casset C, Alcon C, Garcia F et al (2019) Anatomical and hormonal description of rootlet primordium development along white lupin cluster root. Physiol Plant 165:4–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao L-L, Hane J, Kamphuis LG, Foley R, Shi B-J et al (2011) Development of genomic resources for the narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius): construction of a Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) library and BAC-end sequencing. BMC Genomics 12:521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. González-Sama A, Lucas MM, De Felipe MR, Pueyo JJ (2004) An unusual infection mechanism and nodule morphogenesis in white lupin (Lupinus albus). New Phytol 163:371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hane JK, Ming Y, Kamphuis LG, Nelson MN, Garg G et al (2017) A comprehensive draft genome sequence for lupin (Lupinus angustifolius), an emerging health food: insights into plant-microbe interactions and legume evolution. Plant Biotechnol J 15:318–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. James E, Minchin F, Iannetta P, Sprent J (1997) Temporal relationships between nitrogenase and intercellular glycoprotein in developing white lupin nodules. Ann Bot 79:493–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones JDG, Dangl JL (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444:323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kamphuis LG, Hane JK, Nelson MN, Gao L, Atkins CA et al (2015) Transcriptome sequencing of different narrow-leafed lupin tissue types provides a comprehensive uni-gene assembly and extensive gene-based molecular markers. Plant Biotechnol J 13:14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kasprzak A, Safar J, Janda J, Dolezel J, Wolko B et al (2006) The bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library of the narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Cell Mol Biol Lett 11:396–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lambers H, Clements JC, Nelson MN (2013) How a phosphorus-acquisition strategy based on carboxylate exudation powers the success and agronomic potential of lupines (Lupinus, Fabaceae). Am J Bot 100:263–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lambers H, Albornoz F, Kotula L, Laliberte E, Ranathunge K et al (2018) How belowground interactions contribute to the coexistence of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal species in severely phosphorus-impoverished hyperdiverse ecosystems. Plant Soil 424:11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lavin M, Herendeen PS, Wojciechowski MF (2005) Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of lineages during the tertiary. Syst Biol 54:575–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee YP, Mori TA, Sipsas S, Barden A, Puddey IB et al (2006) Lupin-enriched bread increases satiety and reduces energy intake acutely. Am J Clin Nutr 84:975–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lesniewska K, Ksiazkiewicz M, Nelson MN, Mahe F, Ainouche A et al (2011) Assignment of 3 genetic linkage groups to 3 chromosomes of narrow-leafed Lupin. J Hered 102:228–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MacLean AM, Bravo A, Harrison MJ (2017) Plant signaling and metabolic pathways enabling arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Cell 29:2319–2335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oldroyd GED (2013) Speak, friend, and enter: signalling systems that promote beneficial symbiotic associations in plants. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:252–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parra G, Bradnam K, Korf I (2007) CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genornes. Bioinformatics 23:1061–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Priyam A, Woodcroft BJ, Rai V, Munagala A, Moghul I et al (2015) Sequenceserver: a modern graphical user interface for custom BLAST databases.
  29. Qi YP, Tsuda K, Glazebrook J, Katagiri F (2011) Physical association of pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) immune receptors in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant Pathol 12:702–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramirez-Prado JS, Abulfaraj AA, Rayapuram N, Benhamed M, Hirt H (2018) Plant immunity: from signaling to epigenetic control of defense. Trends Plant Sci 23:833–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shane MW, Lambers H (2005) Cluster roots: a curiosity in context. Plant Soil 274:101–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Talhinhas P, Baroncelli R, Le Floch G (2016) Antrhacnose of lupins caused by Colletotrichum lupini: a recent disease and a succssful worldwide pathogen. J Plant Pathol 98:5–14Google Scholar
  33. Tang C, Robson A, Dilworth M, Kuo J (1992) Microscopic evidence on how iron deficiency limits nodule initiation in Lupinus angustifolius L. New Phytol 457–467Google Scholar
  34. Thomma BPHJ, Nurnberger T, Joosten MHAJ (2011) Of PAMPs and effectors: the blurred PTI-ETI dichotomy. Plant Cell 23:4–15Google Scholar
  35. Varshney RK, Glaszmann JC, Leung H, Ribaut JM (2010) More genomic resources for less-studied crops. Trends Biotechnol 28:452–460Google Scholar
  36. Varshney RK, Song C, Saxena RK, Azam S, Yu S et al (2013) Draft genome sequence of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) provides a resource for trait improvement. Nat Biotechnol 31:240–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang HY, Yang H, Shivalila CS, Dawlaty MM, Cheng AW et al (2013) One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 153:910–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang HA, Tao Y, Zheng ZQ, Shao D, Li ZZ et al (2013a) Rapid development of molecular markers by next-generation sequencing linked to a gene conferring phomopsis stem blight disease resistance for marker-assisted selection in lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) breeding. Theoret Appl Genet 126:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang HA, Tao Y, Zheng ZQ, Zhang QS, Zhou GF et al (2013b) Draft genome sequence, and a sequence-defined genetic linkage map of the legume crop species Lupinus angustifolius L. PLoS One 8Google Scholar
  40. Yang HA, Jian JB, Li X, Renshaw D, Clements J et al (2015) Application of whole genome re-sequencing data in the development of diagnostic DNA markers tightly linked to a disease-resistance locus for marker-assisted selection in lupin (Lupinus angustifolius). BMC Genomics 16:660.Google Scholar
  41. Youens-Clark K, Faga B, Yap IV, Stein L, Ware D (2009) CMap 1.01: a comparative mapping application for the internet. Bioinformatics 25:3040–3042CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Agriculture & FoodFloreatAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Curtin UniversityBentleyAustralia
  3. 3.The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations