Abstract
Complex tasks laden with uncertainty predispose to errors and discordant opinions. Thus inter- and intra-reader disagreements reflect in part the inherent difficulty in interpreting medical images, especially if we cannot obtain confirmation of the diagnosis. So we need a working definition of errors in imaging. An error is a missed diagnosis, an inaccurate or incomplete diagnosis, the omission to specify follow-up imaging or additional studies, a suboptimal report, an unacceptable delay in delivering the report to the referring physician, or failure to communicate directly with the referring physician regarding emergencies, and other significant findings (whether urgent or not). The estimated error rate in radiology is 5–30%. Different types of errors may occur simultaneously, and some errors may be propagated for up to several years, before they get discovered. Errors potentially may have devastating consequences both for the patients and the physician who made the error, and thus safety protocols have been proposed and implemented to minimize the occurrence and the adverse impact of errors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The numbers and percentages in the paper do not add up to 100%, due to typing error?
- 2.
I note the following limitations of this study:
-
1.
Illustrations of recurrent/repeated mistakes were not provided,
-
2.
No information was given about:
-
(a)
The number of studies performed before the final diagnosis
-
(b)
The reason(s) the patients underwent additional or follow-up imaging, and
-
(c)
How the radiologist reached the correct diagnosis? (Was it because of the use of contrast medium, difference in technique, higher quality of the study, and interval enlargement of the lesion, or was it because of another reason?)
-
(a)
-
1.
- 3.
Clinically significant errors: altering patient management and outcome.
- 4.
The male gender is used generically and it includes the female gender.
References
Kabadi SJ, Krishmaraj A. Strategies for improving the value of the radiology report: a retrospective analysis of errors in formally over-read studies. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:459–66.
Gunderman RB. The true purpose of a radiology report. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:1450.
Eberhardt SC, Heilbrun ME. Radiology report value equation. Radiographics. 2018;38:1888–96.
Ware JB, Saurabh J, Hoang JK, Baker S, Wruble J. Effective radiology reporting. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:838–9.
Wolfe JM, Evans KK, Drew T, Aizenman A, Josephs E. How do radiologists use the human search engine? Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;169:24–31.
Newman-Toker D. A unified conceptual model for diagnostic errors: underdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, and misdiagnosis. Diagnosis. 2014;1:43–8.
Brady AP. Error and discrepancy in radiology: inevitable or avoidable? Insights Imaging. 2017;8:171–82.
Brady A, Laoide RO, McCarthy P, McDermott R. Discrepancy and error in radiology: concepts, causes and consequences. Ulster Med J. 2012;81:3–9.
Sabih DE, Sabih A, Sabih Q, Khan AN. Image perception and interpretation of abnormalities; can we believe our eyes? Can we do something about it? Insights Imaging. 2011;2:47–55.
Pinto A, Brunese L. Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology. World J Radiol. 2010;2:377–83.
Fitzgerald R. Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworking. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1760–7.
Fitzgerald R. Error in radiology. Clin Radiol. 2001;56:938–46.
Lakhman Y, D’Anastasi M, Micco M, et al. Second-opinion interpretations of gynecologic oncologic MRI examinations by sub-specialized radiologists influence patient care. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:2089–98.
Bruno MA. Our mistakes-the human experience. Video lecture. https://learning.arrs.org/mod/url/view.php?id=400. Accessed 22 Nov 2016.
Bruno MA. 256 shades of gray: uncertainty and diagnostic error in radiology. Diagnosis. 2017;4:149–57.
Robinson PJ. Radiology’s Achilles’ heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Roentgen image. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:1085–98.
Berlin L. Medicolegal-malpractice and ethical issues in radiology. Role of the expert witness. AJR. 2015;204:W371.
Berlin L. Defending the “missed” radiographic diagnosis. AJR. 2001;176:317–22.
Berlin L. Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction. AJR. 2007;189:517–22.
Berlin L. Malpractice issues in radiology. Perceptual errors. AJR. 1996;167:587–90.
Berlin L, Hendrix RW. Perceptual errors and negligence. AJR. 1998;170:863–7.
Waite S, Scott J, Gale B, Fuchs T, Kolla S, Reede D. Interpretive error in radiology. AJR. 2017;208:739–49.
Bui-Mansfield LT. “Fool me twice”: delayed diagnoses in radiology with emphasis on perpetuated errors. Video lecture. https://learning.arrs.org/course/view.php?id=518. Accessed 19 Nov 2017.
Rosenkrantz AB, Bansal NK. Diagnostic errors in abdominopelvic CT interpretation: characterization based on report addenda. Abdom Radiol. 2016;41:1793–9.
Bruno MA, Walker EA, Abujudeh HH. Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics. 2015;35:1668–76.
Berlin L. Radiologic errors, past, present and future. Diagnosis. 2014;1:79–84.
Kim YW, Mansfield LT. Fool me twice: delayed diagnoses in radiology with emphasis on perpetuated errors. AJR. 2014;202:465–70.
McCreadie G, Oliver TB. Eight CT lessons that we learned the hard way: an analysis of current patterns of radiological error and discrepancy with particular emphasis on CT. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:491–9.
Donald JJ, Barnard SA. Common patterns in 558 diagnostic radiology errors. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012;56:173–8.
Funaki B, Szymski G, Rosenblum J. Significant on-call misses by radiology residents interpreting computed tomographic studies: perception versus cognition. Emerg Radiol. 1997;4:290–4.
Renfrew DL, Franken EA Jr, Berbaum KS, Weigelt FH, Abu-Yousef MM. Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology. 1992;183:145–50.
Wakeley CJ, Jones AM, Kabala JE, Prince D, Goddard PR. Audit of the value of double reading magnetic resonance imaging films. Br J Radiol. 1995;68:358–60.
Pinto A, Scuderi MG, Daniele S. Errors in radiology: definition and classification. In: Romano L, Pinto A, editors. Errors in radiology. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 1–7.
Bechtold RE, Chen MY, Ott DJ, Zagoria RJ, Scharling ES, Wolfman NT, Vining DJ. Interpretation of abdominal CT: analysis of errors and their causes. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21:681–5.
Loevner LA, Sonners AI, Schulman BJ, et al. Reinterpretation of cross-sectional images in patients with head and neck cancer in the setting of a multidisciplinary cancer center. AJNR. 2002;23:1622–6.
Owens EJ, Taylor NR, Howlett DC. Perceptual type error in everyday practice. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:593–601.
Li F, Sone S, Abe H, MacMahon H, Armato SG 3rd, Doi K. Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. Radiology. 2002;225:673–83.
Del Ciello A, Franchi P, Contegiacomo A, Cicchetti G, Bonomo L, Larici AR. Missed lung cancer: when, where and why? Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017;23:118–26.
Lauritzen PM, Stavem K, Andersen JG, et al. Double reading of current chest CT examinations: clinical importance of changes to radiology reports. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:199–204.
Lauritzen PM, Andersen JG, Stokke MV, et al. Radiologist-initiated double reading of abdominal CT: retrospective analysis of the clinical importance of changes to radiology reports. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:595–603.
Bisset GS III, Crowe J. Diagnostic errors in interpretation of pediatric musculoskeletal radiographs at common injury sites. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44:552–7.
Driscoll DO, Halpenny D, Guiney M. Radiological error–an early assessment of departmental radiology discrepancy meetings. Ir Med J. 2012;105:172–4.
Gollub MJ, Panicek DM, Bach AM, Penalver A, Castellino RA. Clinical importance of re-interpretation of body CT scans obtained elsewhere in patients referred for care at a tertiary cancer center. Radiology. 1999;210:109–12.
Yoon LS, Haims AH, Brink JA, Rabinovici R, Forman HP. Evaluation of an emergency radiology quality assurance program at a level 1 trauma centre: abdominal and pelvic CT studies. Radiology. 2002;224:42–6.
Tilleman EHBM, Phoa SSKS, van Delden OM, et al. Reinterpretation of radiological imaging in patients referred to a tertiary referral centre with a suspected pancreatic or hepatobiliary malignancy: impact on treatment strategy. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1095–9.
Carney E, Kempf J, DeCarvallho V, Yudd A, Nosher J. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center. AJR. 2003;181:367–73.
Queckel LG, Kessels AG, Goei R, van Engelshoven JM. Miss rate of lung cancer in the chest radiograph in clinical practice. Chest. 1999;115:720–4.
Siegle RL, Baram EM, Reuter SR, Clarke EA, Lancaster JL, McMahan CA. Rates of disagreement in imaging interpretation in a group of community hospitals. Acad Radiol. 1998;5:148–54.
Heriot GS, McKelvie P, Pitman AG. Diagnostic errors in patients dying in hospital: radiology’s contribution. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009;53:188–93.
Berlin L. Accuracy of diagnostic procedures: has it improved over the past five decades? AJR. 2007;188:1173–8.
Forrest JV, Friedman PJ. Radiologic errors in patients with lung cancer. West J Med. 1981;134:485–90.
White CS, Salis AL, Meyer CA. Missed lung cancer on chest radiography and computed tomography: imaging and medicolegal issues. J Thorac Imaging. 1999;14:63–8.
Chesebro AL, Winkler NS, Birdwell RL, Giess CS. Developing asymmetries at mammography: a multimodality approach to assessment and management. Radiographics. 2016;36:322–34.
Wadha A, Sullivan JR, Gonyo MB. Missed breast cancer: what can we learn? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016;45:402–19.
Korhonen KE, Weinstein SP, McDonald ES, Conant EF. Strategies to increase cancer detection: review of true-positive and false-negative results at digital breast tomosynthesis screening. Radiographics. 2016;36:1954–65.
Palazzetti V, Guidi F, Ottaviani L, Valeri G, Baldassarre S, Giusepetti GM. Analysis of mammographic diagnostic errors in breast clinics. Radiol Med. 2016;121:828–33.
Giess CS, Frost EP, Birdwell RL. Interpreting one-view mammographic findings: minimizing call-backs while maximizing cancer detection. Radiographics. 2014;34:928–40.
Gangi S, Fletcher JG, Nathan MA, et al. Time interval between abnormalities seen on CT and the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: retrospective review of CT scans obtained before diagnosis. AJR. 2004;182:897–903.
Garland LH. Studies on the accuracy of diagnostic procedures. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1959;82:25–38.
Abujudeh HH, Boland GW, Kaewlai R, et al. Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:1952–7.
Robinson PJ, Wilson D, Coral A, Murphy A, Verow P. Variation between experienced observers in the interpretation of accident and emergency radiographs. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:323–30.
Babiarsz LS, Yousem DM. Quality control in neuroradiology: discrepancies in image interpretation among academic neuroradiologists. AJNR. 2012;33:969–80.
Eisenberg RL. Should “mature” radiologists be put out to pasture? Radiographics. 2016;36:937–8.
Lum TE, Fairbanks RJ, Pennington EC, Zwemer FL. Profiles in patient safety: misplaced femoral line guidewire and multiple failures to detect the foreign body on chest radiography. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:658–62.
Morgan B, Stephenson JA, Griffin Y. Minimising the impact of errors in the interpretation of CT images for surveillance and evaluation of therapy in cancer. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:1083–94.
Wu MZ, McInnes MD, Macdonald DB, Kielar AZ, Duigenan S. CT in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of interpretation discrepancy rates. Radiology. 2014;270:717–35.
Graber ML. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:ii21–7.
Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ. 2016;353:i2139.
Saber Tehrani AS, Lee HW, Mathews SC, et al. 25 year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986-2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:672–80.
Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim-the doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ. 2000;320:726–7.
Weiss PM. The second victim: effect of medical errors on providers. Grand rounds presentation at All Children’s Hospital Johns Hopkins Medicine, recorded January 31, 2014.
Pratt S, Kenney L, Scott SD, Wu AW. How to develop a second victim support program: a toolkit for health care organizations. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012;38:235–40.
Gunderman RB, Nyce JM. The tyranny of accuracy in radiologic education. Radiology. 2002;222:297–300.
Brook OR, O’Connell AM, Thornton E, Eisenberg RL, Mendiratta-Lala M, Kruskal JB. Quality initiatives: anatomy and pathophysiology of errors occurring in clinical radiology practice. Radiographics. 2010;30:1401–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chrysikopoulos, H. (2020). Definition of Errors in Imaging. In: Errors in Imaging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21103-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21103-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21102-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21103-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)