Advertisement

Local Adaptation in the Interior Spruce Hybrid Complex

  • Jonathan DegnerEmail author
Chapter
  • 121 Downloads
Part of the Compendium of Plant Genomes book series (CPG)

Abstract

Interior spruce is a hybrid species complex composed of white spruce, Engelmann spruce, and their hybrids, distributed across a wide area in western Canada. In both interior spruce and allopatric white spruce, half a century of study on local adaptation to climate has been complemented by a large number of genomic studies within the past decade. This chapter reviews the genomic evidence for local adaptation in interior spruce and allopatric white spruce, comparing the results gleaned from these studies with phenotypic studies when possible. In interior spruce, genomic and phenotypic studies have consistently identified local adaptation to cold temperatures, particularly through autumn cold hardiness, with mixed results for other traits and climatic variables. Studies in allopatric white spruce have found variable evidence for local adaptation, with genomic studies largely finding clinal variation with mean annual temperature. Several genomic approaches have been used to infer local adaptation in this species complex, and these have often found contrasting patterns of adaptation between allopatric white spruce and interior spruce, and weak correlation between genetic markers identified across multiple studies. While genomic and phenotypic analyses are often complementary, novel genomic approaches have also been applied to understand aspects of local adaptation that are difficult or impossible to measure exclusively phenotypically, including hybrid fitness, the genetic architectures of adaptive traits, and phenotypic plasticity.

Keywords

Hybridization Cold hardiness Plasticity Genotype-environment association Clinal variation Climate adaptation 

References

  1. Agrawal AF, Whitlock MC (2012) Mutation load: the fitness of individuals in populations where deleterious alleles are abundant. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 43:115–135Google Scholar
  2. Aitken SN, Whitlock MC (2013) Assisted gene flow to facilitate local adaptation to climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 44:367–388Google Scholar
  3. Aitken SN, Hannerz M (2001) Genecology and gene resource management strategies for conifer cold hardiness. In: Bigras FJ, Colombo SJ (eds) Conifer cold hardiness. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 23–53Google Scholar
  4. Aitken SN, Bemmels JB (2016) Time to get moving: assisted gene flow of forest trees. Evol Appl 9:271–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aitken SN, Yeaman S, Holliday JA, Wang T, Curtis-McLane S (2008) Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evol Appl 1:95–111PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Alberto FJ, Aitken SN, Alía R, González-Martínez SC, Hänninen H, Kremer A, Lefèvre F, Lenormand T, Yeaman S, Whetten R, Savolainen O (2013) Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change - evidence from tree populations. Glob Chang Biol 19:1645–1661PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Alexander RR, Shepperd WD (1984) Silvical characteristics of Engelmann spruce. RM-114, USDA Forest Service, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar
  8. Andalo C, Beaulieu J, Bousquet J (2005) The impact of climate change on growth of local white spruce populations in Québec, Canada. For Ecol Manag 205:169–182Google Scholar
  9. Arnold ML, Hodges SA (1995) Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends Ecol Evol 10:67–71Google Scholar
  10. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 25:25–29Google Scholar
  11. Barton NH (1999) Clines in polygenic traits. Genet Res 74:223–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Barton NH, Gale KS (1993) Genetic analysis of hybrid zones. In: Harrison R (ed) Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Beaumont MA, Balding DJ (2004) Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans. Mol Ecol 13:969–980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Benomar L, Lamhamedi MS, Villeneuve I, Rainville A, Beaulieu J, Bousquet J, Margolis HA (2015) Fine-scale geographic variation in photosynthetic-related traits of Picea glauca seedlings indicates local adaptation to climate. Tree Physiol 35:864–878PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Benomar L, Lamhamedi MS, Rainville A, Beaulieu J, Bousquet J, Margolis HA (2016) Genetic adaptation vs. ecophysiological plasticity of photosynthetic-related traits in young Picea glauca trees along a regional climatic gradient. Front Plant Sci 7:1–15Google Scholar
  16. Benton TG, Grant A (2000) Evolutionary fitness in ecology: comparing measures of fitness in stochastic, density-dependent environments. Evol Ecol Res 2:769–789Google Scholar
  17. Bigras FJ, Ryyppö A, Lindström A, Stattin E (2001) Cold acclimation and deacclimation of shoots and roots of conifer seedlings. In: Bigras FJ, Colombo SJ (eds) Conifer cold hardiness. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 57–88Google Scholar
  18. Birchler J, Yao H, Chudalayandi S (2006) Unraveling the genetic basis of hybrid vigor. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:12957–12958PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Blanquart F, Gandon S, Nuismer SL (2012) The effects of migration and drift on local adaptation to a heterogeneous environment. J Evol Biol 25:1351–1363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Blanquart F, Kaltz O, Nuismer SL, Gandon S (2013) A practical guide to measuring local adaptation. Ecol Lett 16:1195–1205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bouillé M, Senneville S, Bousquet J (2011) Discordant mtDNA and cpDNA phylogenies indicate geographic speciation and reticulation as driving factors for the diversification of the genus Picea. Tree Genet Genomes 7:469–484Google Scholar
  22. Boyle EA, Li YI, Pritchard JK (2017) An expanded view of complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169:1177–1186Google Scholar
  23. Bradshaw AD (1972) Some evolutionary consequences of being a plant. In: Dobzhansky T, Hecht MK, Steere WC (eds) Evolutionary biology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 25–47Google Scholar
  24. Bradshaw AD (1960) Population differentiation in Agrostis tenuis Sibth. III. Populations in varied environments. New Phytol 59:92–103Google Scholar
  25. Bridle JR, Polechová J, Kawata M, Butlin RR (2010) Why is adaptation prevented at ecological margins? New insights from individual-based simulations. Ecol Lett 13:485–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Brown JS, Pavlovic NB (1992) Evolution in heterogeneous environments: effects of migration on habitat specialization. Evol Ecol 6:360–382Google Scholar
  27. Buggs RJA (2007) Empirical study of hybrid zone movement. Heredity 99:301–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ćalić I, Bussotti F, Martínez-García PJ, Neale DB (2016) Recent landscape genomics studies in forest trees—what can we believe? Tree Genet Genomes 12:1–7Google Scholar
  29. Chen J, Källman T, Ma X, Gyllenstrang N, Zaina G, Morgante M, Bousquet J, Eckert A, Wegrzyn J, Neale D, Lagercrantz U, Lascoux M (2012) Disentangling the roles of history and local selection in shaping clinal variation of allele frequencies and gene expression in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Genetics 191:865–881PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Choi Y, Sims GE, Murphy S, Miller JR, Chan AP (2012) Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLoS ONE 7:e46688PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Clausen J, Keck DD, Hiesey WM (1940) Experimental studies on the nature of species I. Effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Institution of Washington, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  32. Colautti RI, Lee CR, Mitchell-Olds T (2012) Origin, fate, and architecture of ecologically relevant genetic variation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15:199–204PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Conte GL, Hodgins KA, Yeaman S, Degner JC, Aitken SN, Rieseberg LH, Whitlock MC (2017) Bioinformatically predicted deleterious mutations reveal complementation in the interior spruce hybrid complex. BMC Genomics 18:1–12Google Scholar
  34. Conkle MT (1973) Growth data for 29 years from the California elevational transect study of Ponderosa pine. For Sci 19:31–39Google Scholar
  35. Cooke JEK, Eriksson ME, Junttila O (2012) The dynamic nature of bud dormancy in trees: environmental control and molecular mechanisms. Plant Cell Environ 35:1707–1728PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Correa JJ, Verdu M, Martinez SG (2010) The contribution of recombination to heterozygosity differs among plant evolutionary lineages and life-forms. BMC Evol Biol 10Google Scholar
  37. Coupé R, Stewart AC, Wikeem BM (1991) Engelmann spruce - subalpine fir zone. In: Meidinger D, Pojar J (eds) Ecosystems of British Columbia. BC Ministry of Forests, Victoria BCGoogle Scholar
  38. Crow JF (1948) Alternative hypotheses of hybrid vigor. Genetics 33:447–487Google Scholar
  39. Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Daubenmire RF (1968) Some geographic variations in Picea sitchensis and their ecological interpretation. Can J Bot 46:787–798Google Scholar
  41. Daubenmire RF (1974) Taxonomic and ecologic relationships between Picea glauca and Picea engelmannii. Can J Bot 52:1545–1560Google Scholar
  42. De La Torre AR, Roberts DR, Aitken SN (2014a) Genome-wide admixture and ecological niche modelling reveal the maintenance of species boundaries despite long history of interspecific gene flow. Mol Ecol 23:2046–2059Google Scholar
  43. De La Torre AR, Wang T, Jaquish B, Aitken SN (2014b) Adaptation and exogenous selection in a Picea glauca x Picea engelmannii hybrid zone: implications for forest management under climate change. New Phytol 201:687–699Google Scholar
  44. De La Torre A, Ingvarsson PK, Aitken SN (2015) Genetic architecture and genomic patterns of gene flow between hybridizing species of Picea. Heredity 115:153–164Google Scholar
  45. de Villemereuil P, Frichot É, Bazin É, François O, Gaggiotti OE (2014) Genome scan methods against more complex models: when and how much should we trust them? Mol Ecol 23:2006–2019PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Evans LM, Slavov GT, Rodgers-Melnick E, Martin J, Ranjan P, Muchero W, Brunner AM, Schackwitz W, Gunter L, Chen JG, Tuskan GA, Difazio SP (2014) Population genomics of Populus trichocarpa identifies signatures of selection and adaptive trait associations. Nat Genet 46:1089–1096PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Falkenhagen ER (1985) Isozyme studies in provenance research of forest trees. Theor Appl Genet 69:335–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Felsenstein J (1976) The theoretical population genetics of variable selection and migration. Annu Rev Genet 10:253–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Fick SE, Hijmans RJ (2017) WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 37:4302–4315Google Scholar
  50. Fournier-Level A, Korte A, Cooper MD, Nordborg M, Schmitt J, Wilczek AM (2011) A map of local adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 334:86–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Fraser DJ, Weir LK, Bernatchez L, Hansen MM, Taylor EB (2011) Extent and scale of local adaptation in salmonid fishes: review and meta-analysis. Heredity 106:404–420PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Funk JL (2008) Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment. J Ecol 96:1162–1173Google Scholar
  53. Garman EH (1957) The occurrence of spruce in the interior of British Columbia. British Columbia Forest Service, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  54. Grøndahl E, Ehlers BK (2008) Local adaptation to biotic factors: reciprocal transplants of four species associated with aromatic Thymus pulegioides and T. serpyllum. J Ecol 96:981–992Google Scholar
  55. Hamilton JA, Aitken SN (2013) Genetic and morphological structure of a spruce hybrid (Picea sitchensis x P. glauca) zone along a climatic gradient. Am J Bot 100:1651–1662PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Hamilton JA, Lexer C, Aitken SN (2013) Differential introgression reveals candidate genes for selection across a spruce (Picea sitchensis × P. glauca) hybrid zone. New Phytol 197:927–938PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Hamilton JA, De la Torre AR, Aitken SN (2015) Fine-scale environmental variation contributes to introgression in a three-species spruce hybrid complex. Tree Genet Genomes 11:817Google Scholar
  58. Hannerz M, Sonesson J, Ekberg I (1999) Genetic correlations between growth and growth rhythm observed in a short-term test and performance in long-term field trials of Norway spruce. Can J For Res 29:768–778Google Scholar
  59. Haselhorst MSH, Buerkle CA (2013) Population genetic structure of Picea engelmannii, P. glauca and their previously unrecognized hybrids in the central Rocky Mountains. Tree Genet Genomes 9:669–681Google Scholar
  60. Hereford J (2009) A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. Am Nat 173:579–588PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Hewitt GM (1988) Hybrid zones - natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends Ecol Evol 3:158–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Hoban S, Kelley JL, Lotterhos KE, Antolin MF, Bradburd G, Lowry DB, Poss ML, Reed LK, Storfer A, Whitlock MC (2016) Finding the genomic basis of local adaptation: Pitfalls, practical solutions, and future directions. Am Nat 188:379–397PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Hoeksema JD, Forde SE (2008) A meta-analysis of factors affecting local adaptation between interacting species. Am Nat 171:275–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Holliday JA, Ralph SG, White R, Bohlmann J, Aitken SN (2008) Global monitoring of autumn gene expression within and among phenotypically divergent populations of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis). New Phytol 178:103–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Hong EP, Park JW (2012) Sample size and statistical power calculation in genetic association studies. Genomics Inform 10:117PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Hornoy B, Pavy N, Gérardi S, Beaulieu J, Bousquet J (2015) Genetic adaptation to climate in white spruce involves small to moderate allele frequency shifts in functionally diverse genes. Genome Biol Evol 7:3269–3285PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Howe GT, Aitken SN, Neale DB, Jermstad KD, Wheeler NC, Chen TH (2003) From genotype to phenotype: unraveling the complexities of cold adaptation in forest trees. Can J Bot 81:1247–1266Google Scholar
  68. Huxley JS (1939) Clines: an auxiliary method in taxonomy. Bijdr tot Dierkd 27:491–520Google Scholar
  69. Jaramillo-Correa JP, Beaulieu J, Bousquet J (2001) Contrasting evolutionary forces driving population structure at expressed sequence tag polymorphisms, allozymes and quantitative traits in white spruce. Mol Ecol 10:2729–2740PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Kassen R (2002) The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity. J Evol Biol 15:173–190Google Scholar
  71. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett 7:1225–1241Google Scholar
  72. Kerner von Marilaun A (1895) Dependence of plant form on soil and climate. In: Oliver FW (ed) The natural history of plants. Blackie, London, pp 495–514Google Scholar
  73. Kim E, Donohue K (2013) Local adaptation and plasticity of Erysimum capitatum to altitude: its implications for responses to climate change. J Ecol 101:796–805Google Scholar
  74. Kueppers LM, Conlisk E, Castanha C, Moyes AB, Germino MJ, de Valpine P, Torn MS, Mitton JB (2017) Warming and provenance limit tree recruitment across and beyond the elevation range of subalpine forest. Glob Chang Biol 23:2383–2395PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Langlet O (1971) Two hundred years genecology. Taxon 20:653–721Google Scholar
  76. Lasky JR, Forester BR, Reimherr M (2018) Coherent synthesis of genomic associations with phenotypes and home environments. Mol Ecol Resour 18:91–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Le Corre V, Kremer A (2012) The genetic differentiation at quantitative trait loci under local adaptation. Mol Ecol 21:1548–1566PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Ledig FT, Hodgskiss PD, Johnson DR (2006) The structure of genetic diversity in Engelmann spruce and a comparison with blue spruce. Can J Bot 84:1806–1828Google Scholar
  79. Leimu R, Fischer M (2008) A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS ONE 3:e4010PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Lenormand T (2002) Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol Evol 17:183–189Google Scholar
  81. Lesser MR, Parker WH (2004) Genetic variation in Picea glauca for growth and phenological traits from provenance tests in Ontario. Silvae Genet 53:141–148Google Scholar
  82. Li P, Beaulieu J, Bousquet J (1997) Genetic structure and patterns of genetic variation among populations in eastern white spruce (Picea glauca). Can J For Res 27:189–198Google Scholar
  83. Liepe KJ, Hamann A, Smets P, Fitzpatrick CR, Aitken SN (2016) Adaptation of lodgepole pine and interior spruce to climate: implications for reforestation in a warming world. Evol Appl 9:409–419PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Lind BM, Friedline CJ, Wegrzyn JL, Maloney PE, Vogler DR, Neale DB, Eckert AJ (2017) Water availability drives signatures of local adaptation in whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis Engelm.) across fine spatial scales of the Lake Tahoe Basin, USA. Mol Ecol 26:3168–3185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Lind BM, Menon M, Bolte CE, Faske TM, Eckert AJ (2018) The genomics of local adaptation in trees: are we out of the woods yet? Tree Genet Genomes 14:29Google Scholar
  86. Linhart YB, Grant MC (1996) Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:237–277Google Scholar
  87. Little EL (1953) A natural hybrid species in Alaska. J For 41:745–746Google Scholar
  88. Little E (1971) Atlas of United States trees volume 1: conifers and important hardwoods. USDA Forest Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  89. Lockwood JD, Aleksić JM, Zou J, Wang J, Liu J, Renner SS (2013) A new phylogeny for the genus Picea from plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 69:717–727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Lotterhos KE, Whitlock MC (2014) Evaluation of demographic history and neutral parameterization on the performance of FST outlier tests. Mol Ecol 23:2178–2192PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. Lotterhos KE, Whitlock MC (2015) The relative power of genome scans to detect local adaptation depends on sampling design and statistical method. Mol Ecol 24:1031–1046PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Lu P, Parker WH, Cherry M, Colombo S, Parker WC, Man R, Roubal N (2014) Survival and growth patterns of white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) rangewide provenances and their implications for climate change adaptation. Ecol Evol 4:2360–2374PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. Lu P, Parker WC, Colombo SJ, Man R (2016) Restructuring tree provenance test data to conform to reciprocal transplant experiments for detecting local adaptation. J Appl Ecol 53:1088–1097Google Scholar
  94. MacLachlan IR, Yeaman S, Aitken SN (2018) Growth gains from selective breeding in a spruce hybrid zone do not compromise local adaptation to climate. Evol Appl 11:166–181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Mägi M, Semchenko M, Kalamees R, Zobel K (2011) Limited phenotypic plasticity in range-edge populations: a comparison of co-occurring populations of two Agrimonia species with different geographical distributions. Plant Biol 13:177–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Mátyás C (1996) Climatic adaptation of trees: rediscovering provenance tests. Euphytica 92:45–54Google Scholar
  97. Mckay JK, Latta RG (2002) Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17:285–291Google Scholar
  98. Meirmans PG, Hedrick PW (2011) Assessing population structure: FST and related measures. Mol Ecol Resour 11:5–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Merilä J, Hendry AP (2014) Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence. Evol Appl 7:1–14PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. Mimura M, Aitken SN (2007) Adaptive gradients and isolation-by-distance with postglacial migration in Picea sitchensis. Heredity 99:224–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Molina-Montenegro MA, Naya DE (2012) Latitudinal patterns in phenotypic plasticity and fitness-related traits: assessing the climatic variability hypothesis (CVH) with an invasive plant species. PLoS One 7:e47620PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. Moore WS (1977) An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Q Rev Biol 52:263–277Google Scholar
  103. Namroud MC, Beaulieu J, Juge N, Laroche J, Bousquet J (2008) Scanning the genome for gene single nucleotide polymorphisms involved in adaptive population differentiation in white spruce. Mol Ecol 17:3599–3613PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. Naudin C, Radlkofer L (1876) Recherches au sujet des influences que les changement de climats exercent sur les plantes. Libraire de L’Académie de Médecine, ParisGoogle Scholar
  105. Nicotra AB, Atkin OK, Bonser SP, Davidson AM, Finnegan EJ, Mathesius U, Poo P, Purugganan MD, Richards CL, Valladares F, van Kleunen M (2010) Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends Plant Sci 12:684–692Google Scholar
  106. Nosil P (2012) Ecological speciation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  107. O’Neill GA, Aitken SN, King JN, Alfaro RI (2002) Geographic variation in resin canal defenses in seedlings from the Sitka spruce × white spruce introgression zone. Can J For Res 32:390–400Google Scholar
  108. O’Neill GA, Stoehr M, Jaquish B (2014) Quantifying safe seed transfer distance and impacts of tree breeding on adaptation. For Ecol Manag 328:122–130Google Scholar
  109. Pavy N, Paule C, Parsons L, Crow JA, Morency MJ, Cooke J, Johnson JE, Noumen E, Guillet-Claude C, Butterfield Y, Barber S, Yang G, Liu J, Stott J, Kirkpatrick R, Siddiqui A, Holt R, Marra M, Seguin A et al (2005) Generation, annotation, analysis and database integration of 16,500 white spruce EST clusters. BMC Genom 6:1–19Google Scholar
  110. Pavy N, Namroud MC, Gagnon F, Isabel N, Bousquet J (2012) The heterogeneous levels of linkage disequilibrium in white spruce genes and comparative analysis with other conifers. Heredity 108:273–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Pavy N, Lamothe M, Pelgas B, Gagnon F, Birol I, Bohlmann J, Mackay J, Isabel N, Bousquet J (2017) A high‐resolution reference genetic map positioning 8.8 K genes for the conifer white spruce: Structural genomics implications and correspondence with physical distance. Plant J 90:189-203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Pelgas B, Bousquet J, Meirmans PG, Ritland K, Isabel N (2011) QTL mapping in white spruce: gene maps and genomic regions underlying adaptive traits across pedigrees, years and environments. BMC Genom 12:145Google Scholar
  113. Rajora OP, Dancik BP (2000) Population genetic variation, structure, and evolution in Engelmann spruce, white spruce, and their natural hybrid complex in Alberta. Can J Bot 78:768–780Google Scholar
  114. Ran JH, Wei XX, Wang XQ (2006) Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Picea (Pinaceae): implications for phylogeographical studies using cytoplasmic haplotypes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 41:405–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Ran JH, Shen TT, Liu WJ, Wang PP, Wang XQ (2015) Mitochondrial introgression and complex biogeographic history of the genus Picea. Mol Phylogenet Evol 93:63–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Rausher MD, Delph LF (2015) Commentary: when does understanding phenotypic evolution require identification of the underlying genes? Evolution 69:1655–1664PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Rehfeldt GE (1994) Adaptation of Picea engelmannii populations to the heterogeneous environments of the intermountain west. Can J Bot 72:1197–1208Google Scholar
  118. Rehfeldt GE (2004) Interspecific and intraspecific variation in Picea engelmannii and its congeneric cohorts: biosystematics, genecology, and climate change. RMRS-GTR-134, USDA Forest Service, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar
  119. Rellstab C, Gugerli F, Eckert AJ, Hancock AM, Holderegger R (2015) A practical guide to environmental association analysis in landscape genomics. Mol Ecol 24:4348–4370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Richardson AD, Keenan TF, Migliavacca M, Ryu Y, Sonnentag O, Toomey M (2013) Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric For Meteorol 169:156–173Google Scholar
  121. Roche L (1969) A genecological study of the genus Picea in British Columbia. New Phytol 68:505–554Google Scholar
  122. Rweyongeza DM, Barnhardt LK, Hansen CR (2011) Patterns of optimal growth for white spruce provenances in Alberta. Ref. T/255, Alberta Tree Improvement and Seed Centre, Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Smoky LakeGoogle Scholar
  123. Sáenz-Romero C, Lindig-Cisneros RA, Joyce DG, Beaulieu J, Bradley JSC, Jaquish BC (2016) Assisted migration of forest populations for adapting trees to climate change. Rev Chapingo, Ser Ciencias For y del Ambient 22:303–323Google Scholar
  124. Sæther SA, Fiske P, Kålås JA, Kuresoo A, Luigujoe L, Piertney SB, Sahlman T, Höglund J (2007) Inferring local adaptation from QST–FST comparisons: neutral genetic and quantitative trait variation in European populations of great snipe. J Evol Biol 20:1563–1576Google Scholar
  125. Sanford E, Kelly MW (2011) Local adaptation in marine invertebrates. Ann Rev Mar Sci 3:509–535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Savolainen O, Pyhäjärvi T, Knürr T (2007) Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:595–619Google Scholar
  127. Savolainen O, Lascoux M, Merilä J (2013) Ecological genomics of local adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 14:807–820PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Schweizer RM, Vonholdt BM, Harrigan R, Knowles JC, Musiana M, Coltman D, Novembre J, Wayne RK (2016) Genetic subdivision and candidate genes under selection in North American grey wolves. Mol Ecol 25:380–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Sebastian-Azcona J, Hacke UG, Hamann A (2018) Adaptations of white spruce to climate: strong intraspecific differences in cold hardiness linked to survival. Ecol Evol 8:1758–1768PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  130. Shafer ABA, Cullingham CI, Côté SD, Coltman DW (2010) Of glaciers and refugia: a decade of study sheds new light on the phylogeography of northwestern North America. Mol Ecol 19:4589–4621PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Shepperd WD, Jeffers RM, Ronco F (1981) An Engelmann spruce seed source study in the Central Rockies. RM-231, USDA Forest Service, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar
  132. Sigurgeirsson A, Szmidt AE (1993) Phylogenetic and biogeographic implications of chloroplast DNA variation in Picea. Nord J Bot 13:233–246Google Scholar
  133. Simpson DG (1994) Seasonal and geographic origin effects on cold hardiness of white spruce buds, foliage, and stems. Can J For Res 24:1066–1070Google Scholar
  134. Singh RK, Svystun T, AlDahmash B, Jönsson AM, Bhalerao RP (2017) Photoperiod- and temperature-mediated control of phenology in trees – a molecular perspective. New Phytol 213:511–524PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Sork VL (2018) Genomic studies of local adaptation in natural plant populations. J Hered 109:3–15Google Scholar
  136. Spichtig M, Kawecki TJ (2004) The maintenance (or not) of polygenic variation by soft selection in heterogeneous environments. Am Nat 164:70–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Stackpole DJ, Vaillancourt RE, de Aguigar M, Potts BM (2010) Age trends in genetic parameters for growth and wood density in Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Genet Genomes 6:179–193Google Scholar
  138. Strasburg JL, Sherman NA, Wright KM, Moyle LC, Willis JH, Rieseberg LH (2012) What can patterns of differentiation across plant genomes tell us about adaptation and speciation? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367:364–373Google Scholar
  139. Sonia SE (2000) Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends Plant Sci 5:537–542Google Scholar
  140. Sultan SE, Spencer HG (2002) Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am Nat 160:271–283Google Scholar
  141. Suren H, Hodgins KA, Yeaman S, Nurkowski KA, Smets P, Rieseberg LH (2016) Exome capture from the spruce and pine giga-genomes. Mol Ecol Resour 16:1136–1146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Tigano A, Friesen VL (2016) Genomics of local adaptation with gene flow. Mol Ecol 25:2144–2164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Turesson G (1922) The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas 3:211–350Google Scholar
  144. Ukrainetz NK, O’Neill GA, Jaquish B (2011) Comparison of fixed and focal point seed transfer systems for reforestation and assisted migration: a case study for interior spruce in British Columbia. Can J For Res 41:1452–1464Google Scholar
  145. Valladares F, Matesanz S, Guilhaumon F, Araújo MB, Balaguer L, Benito-Garzón M, Cornwell W, Gianoli E, van Kleunen M, Naya DE, Nicotra AB, Poorter H, Zavala MA (2014) The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. Ecol Lett 17:1351–1364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Wang T, Hamann A, Spittlehouse DL, Aitken SN (2006) Development of scale-free climate data for western Canada for use in resource management. Int J Climatol 26:383–397Google Scholar
  147. Wang T, Hamann A, Spittlehouse D, Carroll C (2016) Locally downscaled and spatially customizable climate data for historical and future periods in North America. PLoS ONE 11:e0156720PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  148. Warren RL, Keeling CI, Saint YM, Raymond A, Taylor GA, Vandervalk BP, Mohamadi H, Paulino D, Chiu R, Jackman SD, Robertson G, Yang C, Boyle B, Hoffmann M, Weigel D, Nelson DR, Ritland C, Isabel N, Jaquish B et al (2015) Improved white spruce (Picea glauca) genome assemblies and annotation of large gene families of conifer terpenoid and phenolic defense metabolism. Plant J 83:189–212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Waser NM, Price MV (1985) Reciprocal transplant experiments with Delphinium nelsonii (Ranunculaceae): evidence for local adaptation. Am J Bot 72:1726–1732Google Scholar
  150. Weeden NF, Wendel JF (1989) Genetics of plant isozymes. In: Soltis D, Soltis P (eds) Isozymes in plant biology. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 46–72Google Scholar
  151. Weng YH, Tosh KJ, Park YS, Fullarton MS (2007) Age-related trends in genetic parameters for jack pine and their implications for early selection. Silvae Genet 56:242–252Google Scholar
  152. Whitlock MC (2008) Evolutionary inference from QST. Mol Ecol 17:1885–1896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:433–458Google Scholar
  154. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  155. Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–158PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. Wright S (1949) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen 15:323–354Google Scholar
  157. Xie C-Y (2003) Genotype by environment interaction and its implications for genetic improvement of interior spruce in British Columbia. Can J For Res 33:1635–1643Google Scholar
  158. Yeaman S (2015) Local adaptation by alleles of small effect. Am Nat 186:S74–S89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Yeaman S, Otto SP (2011) Establishment and maintenance of adaptive genetic divergence under migration, selection, and drift. Evolution 65:2123–2129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. Yeaman S, Hodgins KA, Suren H, Nurkowski KA, Rieseberg LH, Holliday JA, Aitken SN (2014) Conservation and divergence of gene expression plasticity following c. 140 million years of evolution in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and interior spruce (Picea glauca x Picea engelmannii). New Phytol 203:578–591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. Yeaman S, Hodgins KA, Lotterhos KE, Suren H, Nadeau S, Degner JC, Nurkowski KA, Smets P, Wang T, Gray LK, Liepe KJ, Hamann A, Holliday JA, Whitlock MC, Rieseberg LH, Aitken SN (2016) Convergent local adaptation to climate in distantly related conifers. Science 353:23–26Google Scholar
  162. Ying CC, Yanchuk AD (2006) The development of British Columbia’s tree seed transfer guidelines: purpose, concept, methodology, and implementation. For Ecol Manag 227:1–13Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest and Conservation Science, Faculty of ForestryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations