Advertisement

Interactive Video for Learning: A Review of Interaction Types, Commercial Platforms, and Design Guidelines

  • George PalaigeorgiouEmail author
  • Anthia Papadopoulou
  • Ioannis Kazanidis
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 993)

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a sharp increase of research in employing interactive video for learning. More researchers study both the functional and cognitive interactivity affordances of educational interactive video and try to identify the learning effectiveness of the various supported interactions. In this study, we aim at providing a review of the interactivity types and their educational value based on the analysis of 18 studies and 13 commercial interactive video environments. We also analyze whether the commercial environments keep up with the research trends. Finally, we provide specific design guidelines for developing effective educational interactive videos. Such holistic review approaches help to promote the research field in everyday educational environments but also reveal its promises and gaps. The educational interactive video seems to be a fast-changing field which needs further inquiry, while the available commercial platforms have just started to incorporate functionality proposed in the literature.

Keywords

Interactive video Hypervideo Video-based learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Fern, A., Givan, R., Siskind, J.M.: Specific-to-general learning for temporal events with application to learning event definitions from video. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 17, 379–449 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Syed, M.R.: Diminishing the distance in distance education. IEEE Multimed. 8(3), 18–20 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ertelt, A., Renkl, A., Spada, H.: Making a difference: exploiting the full potential of instructionally designed on-screen videos. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences, pp. 154–160. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Papadopoulou, A., Palaigeorgiou, G.: Interactive video, tablets and self-paced learning in the classroom: preservice teachers perceptions. In: 13th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, pp. 195–202. IADIS (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dimou, A., Tsoumakas, G., Mezaris, V., Kompatsiaris, I., Vlahavas, I.: An empirical study of multi-label learning methods for video annotation. In: Seventh International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI 2009), pp. 19–24. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weston, T.J., Barker, L.: Designing, implementing, and evaluating web-based learning modules for university students. Educ. Technol. 41(4), 15–22 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meixner, B.: Hypervideos and interactive multimedia presentations. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 50(1), 9 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krammer, K., Ratzka, N., Klieme, E., Lipowsky, F., Pauli, C., Reusser, K.: Learning with classroom videos: conception and first results of an online teacher-training program. ZDM 38(5), 422–432 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dror, I.E.: Technology enhanced learning: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Pragmat. Cogn. 16(2), 215–223 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schoeffmann, K., Hudelist, M.A., Huber, J.: Video interaction tools: a survey of recent work. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 48(1), 14 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Palaigeorgiou, G., Chloptsidou, I., Lemonidis, C.: Computational estimation in the classroom with tablets, interactive selfie video and self-regulated learning. In: Auer, M.E., Tsiatsos, T. (eds.) IMCL 2017. AISC, vol. 725, pp. 860–871. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75175-7_84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meixner, B., John, S., Handschigl, C.: Siva suite: framework for hypervideo creation, playback and management. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 713–716. ACM, October 2015Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schank, R.: Virtual Learning. A Revolutionary Approach to Building a Highly Skilled Workforce. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cherrett, T., Wills, G., Price, J., Maynard, S., Dror, I.E.: Making training more cognitively effective: making videos interactive. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 40(6), 1124–1134 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vural, O.F.: The impact of a question-embedded video-based learning tool on e-learning. Educ. Sci.: Theory Pract. 13(2), 1315–1323 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cairncross, S., Mannion, M.: Interactive multimedia and learning: realizing the benefits. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 38(2), 156–164 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seidel, N.: Making web video accessible: interaction design patterns for assistive video learning environments. In: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, p. 17. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bulterman, D.C.: Creating peer-level video annotations for web-based multimedia. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Eurographics conference on Multimedia, pp. 49–57. Eurographics Association (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yoshitaka, A., Sawada, K.: Personalized video summarization based on behavior of viewer. In: Eighth International Conference on Signal Image Technology and Internet Based Systems (SITIS), pp. 661–667. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seidel, N.: Interaction design patterns for spatio-temporal annotations in video learning environments. In: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, p. 16. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meixner, B., Gold, M.: Second-layer navigation in mobile hypervideo for medical training. In: Tian, Q., Sebe, N., Qi, G.-J., Huet, B., Hong, R., Liu, X. (eds.) MMM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9516, pp. 382–394. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27671-7_32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Al-Hajri, A., Miller, G., Fels, S., Fong, M.: Video navigation with a personal viewing history. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8119, pp. 352–369. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40477-1_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., Van Merrienboer, J.J., Van Gog, T.: Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Comput. Hum. Behav. 20(4), 551–567 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spiro, R.J.: Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In: Cognition, Education, and Multimedia, pp. 177–220. Routledge (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Borkowski, J.G., Carr, M., Rellinger, E., Pressley, M.: Self-regulated cognition: interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. Dimens. Think. Cogn. Instr. 1, 53–92 (1990)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen, X.Y., Segall, Z.: XV-Pod: an emotion aware, affective mobile video player. In: 2009 World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering, pp. 277–281. IEEE, March 2009Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 43–52 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Merrill, M.D.: First principles of instruction. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 50(3), 43–59 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shute, V.J., Ventura, M., Kim, Y.J.: Assessment and learning of qualitative physics in Newton’s playground. J. Educ. Res. 106(6), 423–430 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nicol, D.J., Macfarlane-Dick, D.: Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud. High. Educ. 31(2), 199–218 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Giannakos, M.N., Chorianopoulos, K., Chrisochoides, N.: Making sense of video analytics: lessons learned from clickstream interactions, attitudes, and learning outcome in a video-assisted course. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 16(1) (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Meixner, B., Kosch, H.: Creating and presenting interactive non-linear video stories with the SIVA Suite. In: Adjunct Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Interactive Content Consumption at EuroITV, pp. 160–165 (2016)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Onita, M., Petan, S., Vasiu, R.: Review of interactive video-romanian project proposal. Int. Educ. Stud. 9(3), 24 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shroff, N., Turaga, P., Chellappa, R.: Video précis: highlighting diverse aspects of videos. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 12(8), 853–868 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Meixner, B., Matusik, K., Grill, C., Kosch, H.: Towards an easy to use authoring tool for interactive non-linear video. Multimed. Tools Appl. 70(2), 1251–1276 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schummer, T., Lukosch, S.: Patterns for Computer-Mediated Interaction. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lauer, T., Trahasch, S.: Strukturierte verankerte Diskussion als Form kooperativen Lernens mit eLectures. In: Workshop Proceedings DeLFI, pp. 31–37 (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Müller, M., Otero, N., Alissandrakis, A., Milrad, M.: Increasing user engagement with distributed public displays through the awareness of peer interactions. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, pp. 23–29. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dimitrova, V., Mitrovic, A., Piotrkowicz, A., Lau, L., Weerasinghe, A.: Using learning analytics to devise interactive personalised nudges for active video watching. In: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 22–31. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ketterl, Μ., Mertens, Ρ., Vornberger, Ο.: Vorlesungsaufzeichnungen 2.0. In: Lernen–Organisation–Gesellschaft, eCampus-Symposium der Osnabrücker Hochschulen, pp. 2–5 (2008)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bagga, A., Hu, J., Zhong, J.: U.S. Patent, No. 8,872,979. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC (2014)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Herron, C.: An investigation of the effectiveness of using an advance organizer to introduce video in the foreign language classroom. Mod. Lang. J. 78(2), 190–198 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cobârzan, C., Hudelist, M.A., Del Fabro, M.: Content-based video browsing with collaborating mobile clients. In: Gurrin, C., Hopfgartner, F., Hurst, W., Johansen, H., Lee, H., O’Connor, N. (eds.) MMM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8326, pp. 402–406. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04117-9_46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hürst, W., Darzentas, D.: HiStory: a hierarchical storyboard interface design for video browsing on mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, p. 17. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Meixner, B.: Annotated Interactive Non-linear Video - Software Suite, Download and Cache Management, Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Passau (2014). https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-uni-passau/files/222/Meixner_Britta.pdf
  46. 46.
    Zhang, X., Toni, L., Frossard, P., Zhao, Y., Lin, C.: Optimized receiver control in interactive multiview video streaming systems. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kim, D.H., Chang, W.S., Lee, D.H., Hwang, S.T.: U.S. Patent Application No. 15/338,965. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Western MacedoniaFlorinaGreece
  2. 2.Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of TechnologyKavalaGreece

Personalised recommendations