Skip to main content

Completely-Randomized Designs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Primer of Permutation Statistical Methods

Abstract

This chapter introduces permutation methods for multiple independent variables; that is, completely-randomized designs. Included in this chapter are six example analyses illustrating computation of exact permutation probability values for multi-sample tests, calculation of measures of effect size for multi-sample tests, the effect of extreme values on conventional and permutation multi-sample tests, exact and Monte Carlo permutation procedures for multi-sample tests, application of permutation methods to multi-sample rank-score data, and analysis of multi-sample multivariate data. Included in this chapter are permutation versions of Fisher’s F test for one-way, completely-randomized analysis of variance, the Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance for ranks, the Bartlett–Nanda–Pillai trace test for multivariate analysis of variance, and a permutation-based alternative for the four conventional measures of effect size for multi-sample tests: Cohen’s \(\hat {d}\), Pearson’s η 2, Kelley’s \(\hat {\eta }^{2}\), and Hays’ \(\hat {\omega }^{2}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In some disciplines tests on multiple independent samples are known as between-subjects tests and tests for multiple dependent or related samples are known as within-subjects tests.

  2. 2.

    The terms MS Between and MS Within are only one set of descriptive labels for the numerator and denominator of the F-ratio test statistic. MS Between is often replaced by either MS Treatment or MS Factor and MS Within is often replaced by MS Error.

  3. 3.

    It is well known that Kelley’s correlation ratio is not unbiased, but since the title of Truman Kelley’s 1935 article was “An unbiased correlation ratio measure,” the label has persisted.

  4. 4.

    Since the sizes of the treatment groups are not equal, the average value of \(\bar {n} = 3.3333\) is used for both Cohen’s \(\hat {d}\) measure of effect size and Hays’ \(\hat {\omega }_{\text{R}}^{2}\) measure of effect size for a random-effects model. In cases where the treatment-group sizes differ greatly, a weighted average recommended by Haggard is often adopted [6].

  5. 5.

    For a one-way completely-randomized analysis of variance, a fixed-effects model and a random-effects model yield the same F-ratio, but measures of effect size can differ under the two models.

References

  1. Bartlett, M.S.: A note on tests of significance in multivariate analysis. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 34, 33–40 (1939)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry, K.J., Mielke, P.W., Johnston, J.E.: Permutation Statistical Methods: An Integrated Approach. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Boik, R.J.: The Fisher–Pitman permutation test: a non-robust alternative to the normal theory F test when variances are heterogeneous. Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 40, 26–42 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Box, J.F.: R. A. Fisher: The Life of a Scientist. Wiley, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Festinger, L.: The significance of differences between means without reference to the frequency distribution function. Psychometrika 11, 97–105 (1946)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Haggard, E.A.: Intraclass Correlation and the Analysis of Variance. Dryden, New York (1958)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Haldane, J.B.S., Smith, C.A.B.: A simple exact test for birth-order effect. Ann. Eugenic. 14, 117–124 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hall, N.S.: R. A. Fisher and his advocacy of randomization. J. Hist. Biol. 40, 295–325 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hotelling, H.: A generalized T test and measure of multivariate dispersion. In: Neyman, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. II, pp. 23–41. University of California Press, Berkeley (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hotelling, H., Pabst, M.R.: Rank correlation and tests of significance involving no assumption of normality. Ann. Math. Stat. 7, 29–43 (1936)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnston, J.E., Berry, K.J., Mielke, P.W.: Permutation tests: precision in estimating probability values. Percept. Motor Skill. 105, 915–920 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kruskal, W.H., Wallis, W.A.: Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47, 583–621 (1952). [Erratum: J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 48, 907–911 (1953)]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lawley, D.N.: A generalization of Fisher’s z test. Biometrika 30, 180–187 (1938)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawley, D.N.: Corrections to “A generalization of Fisher’s z test”. Biometrika 30, 467–469 (1939)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mann, H.B., Whitney, D.R.: On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat. 18, 50–60 (1947)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Nanda, D.N.: Distribution of the sum of roots of a determinantal equation. Ann. Math. Stat. 21, 432–439 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olson, C.L.: On choosing a test statistic in multivariate analysis of variance. Psychol. Bull. 83, 579–586 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Olson, C.L.: Practical considerations in choosing a MANOVA test statistic: a rejoinder to Stevens. Psychol. Bull. 86, 1350–1352 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pillai, K.C.S.: Some new test criteria in multivariate analysis. Ann. Math. Stat. 26, 117–121 (1955)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Roy, S.N.: On a heuristic method of test construction and its use in multivariate analysis. Ann. Math. Stat. 24, 220–238 (1953)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Roy, S.N.: Some Aspects of Multivariate Analysis. Wiley, New York (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Snedecor, G.W.: Calculation and Interpretation of Analysis of Variance and Covariance. Collegiate Press, Ames (1934)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S.: Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th edn. Pearson, Boston (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. van der Reyden, D.: A simple statistical significance test. Rhod. Agric. J. 49, 96–104 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wilcoxon, F.: Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bull. 1, 80–83 (1945)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilks, S.S.: Certain generalizations in the analysis of variance. Biometrika 24, 471–494 (1932)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Berry, K.J., Johnston, J.E., Mielke, P.W. (2019). Completely-Randomized Designs. In: A Primer of Permutation Statistical Methods. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20933-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics