Skip to main content

Different Forms of Generalized Hypothetical Syllogism with Regard to R-Implications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ICAISC 2019)

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the generalized hypothetical syllogism (GHS). We present few versions of the well known GHS equation. We focus our attention on R-implications and give some results concerning left-continuous t-norms. We show some solutions of GHS equations based on the compositional rule of inference and Bandler-Kohout subproduct. Also we sketch the idea of new possible functional equations coming from the GHS.

This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, through research Project Number 2015/19/B/ST6/03259.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baczyński, M., Jayaram, B.: Fuzzy Implications, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 231. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69082-5

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baczyński, M., Miś, K.: Selected properties of generalized hypothetical syllogism including the case of R-implications. In: Medina, J., et al. (eds.) IPMU 2018. CCIS, vol. 853, pp. 673–684. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91473-2_57

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandler, W., Kohout, L.J.: Semantics of implication operators and fuzzy relational products. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 12, 89–116 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Durante, F., Sempi, C.: Semicopulae. Kybernetika 41(3), 315–328 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Fodor, J., Keresztfalvi, T.: Nonstandard conjunctions and implications in fuzzy logic. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 12(2), 69–84 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Gottwald, S.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: The Foundations of Application – from a Mathematical Point of View. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-86812-1

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Igel, C., Temme, K.H.: The chaining syllogism in fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 12, 849–853 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Klement, E.P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Triangular Norms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Klir, G.J., Yuan, B.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Król, A.: Dependencies between fuzzy conjunctions and implications. In: Galichet, S., Montero, J., Mauris, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT-2011) and LFA-2011. Advances in Intelligent Systems Research, vol. 1, pp. 230–237. Atlantis Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mamdani, E.H., Assilian, S.: An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 7, 1–13 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pedrycz, W.: Applications of fuzzy relational equations for methods of reasoning in presence of fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 16, 163–175 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Vemuri, N.R.: Investigations of fuzzy implications satisfying generalized hypothetical syllogism. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 323, 117–137 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Štěpnička, M., Jayaram, B.: On the suitability of the Bandler-Kohout subproduct as an inference mechanism. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 18(2), 285–298 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zadeh, L.A.: Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 3, 28–44 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, through research Project Number 2015/19/B/ST6/03259. The authors would like to thank Professor Balasubramaniam Jayaram for the inspiring discussion during his stay in Katowice and his constructive suggestions which contributed to the development of this research topic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michał Baczyński .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Miś, K., Baczyński, M. (2019). Different Forms of Generalized Hypothetical Syllogism with Regard to R-Implications. In: Rutkowski, L., Scherer, R., Korytkowski, M., Pedrycz, W., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zurada, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. ICAISC 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11508. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20912-4_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20912-4_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20911-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20912-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics