Building an Open-Source Cross-Cloud DevOps Stack for a CRM Enterprise Application: A Case Study

  • Sebastian SchorkEmail author
  • Feroz Zahid
  • Dipesh Pradhan
  • Sébastien Kicin
  • Antonia Schwichtenberg
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 556)


Open Source software solutions play a critical role for the SMEs by enabling easy access to reusable software. Also, with the rapid growth in the popularity of the cloud technologies, computational demands of SMEs are cost-efficiently met by the public clouds as users can dynamically acquire resources on demand according to their needs. However, non-standardized cloud interfaces, lack of inter-cloud transparency, and complex cost models, often result in vendor lock-in. Once in vendor lock-in, cloud users have to live with a single cloud provider and accept whatever pricing schemes and SLAs are imposed. Moreover, new regulations covered by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe require companies to enforce policies regarding secure storage of data in the cloud, as well as restrict moving confidential datasets outside Europe. This situation requires a more transparent use of cloud resources from multiple cloud providers, that conform with user’s data privacy needs, service requirements, and budget.

In this paper, we discuss challenges and pitfalls of designing a Cross-Cloud DevOps stack for an app-based extension platform of a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system. The fully-automated DevOps stack, based on open source software tools and technologies, has been developed in close coordination with an open source integration project, Melodic. With the help of our DevOps stack, third-party apps in our CRM software are now Multi-Cloud ready, and the data storage in the cloud by the users conforms to potential GDPR requirements. In addition, the deployment time of apps has been reduced to minutes, while the platform is able to scale up and scale down apps efficiently based on the current workload requirements, saving substantial cloud costs.


Open source Cross-Cloud DevOps 


  1. 1.
    McKendrick, J.: Cloud computing’s vendor lock-in problem: why the industry is taking a step backward. Forbes, November 2011Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Opara-Martins, J., Sahandi, R., Tian, F.: Critical review of vendor lock-in and its impact on adoption of cloud computing (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weinhardt, C., Anandasivam, A., Blau, B., Stößer, J.: Business models in the service world. IT Prof. 2, 28–33 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schad, J., Dittrich, J., Quiané-Ruiz, J.A.: Runtime measurements in the cloud: observing, analyzing, and reducing variance. Proc. VLDB Endow. 3(1–2), 460–471 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kurze, T., Klems, M., Bermbach, D., Lenk, A., Tai, S., Kunze, M.: Cloud federation. Cloud Comput. 2011, 32–38 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sefraoui, O., Aissaoui, M., Eleuldj, M.: OpenStack: toward an open-source solution for cloud computing. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 55(3), 38–42 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Petcu, D.: Portability and interoperability between clouds: challenges and case study. In: Abramowicz, W., Llorente, I.M., Surridge, M., Zisman, A., Vayssière, J. (eds.) ServiceWave 2011. LNCS, vol. 6994, pp. 62–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taherkordi, A., Zahid, F., Verginadis, Y., Horn, G.: Future cloud systems design: challenges and research directions. IEEE Access 6, 74120–74150 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bubak, M., Baliś, B., Kitowski, J., Król, D., Kryza, B., Malawski, M.: PaaSage: model-based cloud platform upperware (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferry, N., Song, H., Rossini, A., Chauvel, F., Solberg, A.: CloudMF: applying MDE to tame the complexity of managing multi-cloud applications. In: IEEE/ACM 7th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC), pp. 269–277. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hindman, B., et al.: Mesos: a platform for fine-grained resource sharing in the data center. In: NSDI, vol. 11, p. 22 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mcluckie, C.: Containers, VMs, Kubernetes and VMware. Accessed 13 Jan 2019
  13. 13.
    Swarm: a Docker-native clustering system. Accessed 13 Jan 2019
  14. 14.
    Slawik, M., et al.: CYCLONE unified deployment and management of federated, multi-cloud applications. In: 2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC), pp. 453–457. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    What is DC/OS? Accessed 13 Jan 2019
  16. 16.
    Rosen, L.: Which Open Source license should I use for my software. Open Source Initiative (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosen, L.: Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rossini, A.: Cloud application modelling and execution language (CAMEL) and the PaaSage workflow. In: Advances in Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing-Workshops of ESOCC, vol. 567, pp. 437–439 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Schork
    • 1
    Email author
  • Feroz Zahid
    • 2
  • Dipesh Pradhan
    • 2
  • Sébastien Kicin
    • 1
  • Antonia Schwichtenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.CAS Software AGKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Simula Research LaboratoryFornebuNorway

Personalised recommendations