Signal Analysis and Numerical Method Roles in Neural Interfaces Development

  • I. KuzmanićEmail author
  • I. Vujović
  • J. Šoda
  • M. Rogić Vidaković
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 113)


Neural interfaces are developing worldwide owing to the wide spectrum of possible applications, ranging from military to entertainment industry. Future human-machine interaction (HMI) and brain-machine interfaces (BMI) are inconceivable without further development in the field. Possible applications can also be found in traffic, i.e. remote supervision and/or control of vehicles/ships. In order to obtain effective BMI, two tasks should be performed: the calculation of the EM field by numerical methods (FEM (Finite Elements Method), BEM (Boundary Elements Method), and hybrid) and signal analysis, which should tell the machine what is required (command understanding). Examples of brain signal analysis using FFT and various WT transforms are presented. The basics of numerical methods for topic application are also covered. EEG data are obtained by experiments on consenting human subjects. Finally, the implications of neural interface development and introduction to traffic applications are considered.


Signal processing and analysis BEM/FEM BMI Wavelets Short-time FT EMD 


  1. 1.
    Vidaković MR, Jerlović A, Jurić T, Vujović I, Šoda J, Erceg N, Bubić A, Schönwald MZ, Liumis P, Gabelica D, Đogaš Z (2016) Neurophysiologic markers of primary motor cortex for laryngeal muscles and premotor cortex in caudal opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus investigated in motor speech disorder: a navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study. Cogn Process 17:429–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kocadagli O, Langari R (2017) Classification of EEG signals for epileptic seizures using hybrid artificial neural networks based wavelet transforms and fuzzy relations. Expert Syst Appl 88:419–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patidar S, Panigrahi T (2017) Detection of epileptic seizure using Kraskov entropy applied on tunable-Q wavelet transform of EEG signals. Biomed Signal Process Control 34:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vidaković MR, Gabelica D, Vujović I, Šoda J, Batarelo N, Džimbeg A, Schönwald MZ, Rotim K, Đogaš Z (2015) A novel approach for monitoring writing interferences during navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mappings of writing related cortical areas. J Neurosci Meth 255:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mousaa FA, El-Khoribib RA, Shomanb ME (2016) A novel brain computer interface based on principle component analysis. Procedia Comput Sci 82:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gandhi V, Prasad G, Coyle D, Behera L, McGinnity TM (2015) Evaluating quantum neural network filtered motor imagery brain-computer interface using multiple classification techniques. Neurocomputing 170:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cecílio J, Andrade J, Martins P, Castelo-Branco M, Furtado P (2016) BCI framework based on games to teach people with cognitive and motor limitations. Procedia Comput Sci 83:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vukšić M, Josipović S, Čorić A, Kraljevića A (2017) Underwater ROV as inspection and development platform. Trans Marit Sci.
  9. 9.
    Mudronja L, Matić P, Katalinić M (2017) Data-based modelling of significant wave height in the adriatic sea. Trans Marit Sci.
  10. 10.
    Bennakhi A, Safar M, Abdulrasoul J (2017) Homonoia: when your car reads your mind. Procedia Comput Sci 110:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ganin IP, Shishkin SL, Kaplan AY (2013) A P300-based brain-computer interface with stimuli on moving objects: four-session single-trial and triple-trial tests with a game-like task design. PLoS ONE 8.
  12. 12.
    Mak JN, Arbel Y, Minett JW, McCane LM, Yuksel B et al (2011) Optimizing the P300-based brain-computer interface: current status, limitations and future directions. J Neural Eng.
  13. 13.
    Vujović I, Šoda J, Kuzmanić I (2012) Cutting-edge mathematical tools in processing and analysis of signals in marine and navy. Trans Marit Sci.
  14. 14.
    Selesnick IW, Baraniuk RG, Kingsbury NG (2005) The dual-tree complex wavelet transform. IEEE Signal Process Mag 22:123–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poljak D, Cavka D, Dodig H, Peratta C, Peratta A (2014) On the use of the boundary element analysis in bioelectromagnetics. Eng Anal Bound Elem 49:2–14MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dodig H, Poljak D, Peratta A (2012) Hybrid BEM/FEM edge element computation of the thermal rise in the 3D model of the human eye induced by high frequency EM waves. In: 20th international conference on software, telecommunications and computer networks (SoftCOM), pp 1–5Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dodig H, Cvetkovic M, Poljak D, Hirata A, Laakso I (2017) Hybrid FEM/BEM for human head exposed to high frequency electromagnetic radiation. In: 40th international conference on boundary elements and other mesh reduction methods, Brockenhurst, UK, pp 239–250, 12–14 Sept 2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Kuzmanić
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. Vujović
    • 1
  • J. Šoda
    • 1
  • M. Rogić Vidaković
    • 2
  1. 1.Analysis and Advanced Diagnostics Research and Education Laboratory (SPAADREL), Faculty of Maritime Studies, Signal ProcessingUniversity of SplitSplitCroatia
  2. 2.Department of Neuroscience, Laboratory for Human and Experimental Neurophysiology (LAHEN), School of MedicineUniversity of SplitSplitCroatia

Personalised recommendations