Skip to main content

Evaluation of the Disciplinary Competences of the Students of the Bachelor’s Degree in Physiotherapy at “Sapienza” University of Rome Through the TECO: A Cross-Sectional Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning Technology for Education Challenges (LTEC 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1011))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The objective of the study is to evaluate whether the TECO-D is a useful tool for measuring the skills acquired by students during three years of the physiotherapy bachelor’s degree course at the “Sapienza” University of Rome. The sample was recruited between October and December 2017. To be included in the study, the participants had to be enrolled in the bachelor’s degree course in physiotherapy at the “Sapienza” University of Rome and had to be on track with the course’s prescribed completion timeframe. The distribution of the scores for the TECO-D shows an increasing average (Standard Deviation) from 147.1 ± 34.5 in the first year up to 227.1 ± 17.8 for graduating students. Progress testing is a form of assessment in which groups of learners of different seniority (i.e., different classes in a curriculum) are given the same written test. The test is comprehensive by sampling all relevant disciplines in a curriculum, usually determined by a fixed blueprint. The total score of the TECO-D exponentially increased between the first and second years of the course. In fact, the score, at the first year of the course, was averaged at 147 ± 34.5 and increased up to 204 ± 23.2 in the second year. Regarding the third year of the course and the undergraduates, there was an increase, but the latter was less significant. Because of this, we can say that the TECO-D is a great tool for measuring student’s knowledge in order to evaluate study programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Van der Vleuten, C.P.M., Verwijnen, G.M., Wijnen, H.F.W.: Fifteen years of experience with progress testing in a problem-based learning curriculum. Med. Teach. 18, 103–109 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599609034142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold, L., Willoughby, T.L.: The quarterly profile examination. Acad. Med. 65, 515–516 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Newble, D.I., Jaeger, K.: The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students. Med. Educ. 17, 165–171 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frederiksen, N.: The real test bias: influences of testing on teaching and learning. Am. Psychol. 39, 193–202 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. http://www.anvur.it/attivita/ava/teco-test-sulle-competenze/. Accessed 18 Dec 2018

  6. https://enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf. Accessed 18 Dec 2018

  7. http://attiministeriali.miur.it/anno-2016/dicembre/dm-12122016.aspx

  8. Galeoto, G., Rumiati, R., Sabella, M., Sansoni, J.: The use of a dedicated platform to evaluate health-professions university courses. In: Di Mascio, T., Vittorini, P., Gennari, R., De la Prieta, F., Rodríguez, S., Temperini, M., Azambuja Silveira, R., Popescu, E., Lancia, L. (eds.) MIS4TEL 2018. AISC, vol. 804, pp. 275–284. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98872-6_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. McHarg, J., Bradley, P., Chamberlain, S., Ricketts, C., Searle, J., McLachlan, J.C.: Assessment of progress tests. Med. Educ. 39(2), 221–227 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeman, A., Van Der Vleuten, C., Nouns, Z., Ricketts, C.: Progress testing internationally. Med. Teach. 32(6), 451–455 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Culicchia, G., et al.: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Jebsen-Taylor hand function test in an Italian population. Rehabil. Res. Pract. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Castiglia, S.F., et al.: The culturally adapted Italian version of the Barthel Index (IcaBI): assessment of structural validity, inter-rater reliability and responsiveness to clinically relevant improvements in patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation centers. Funct. Neurol. 32(4), 221 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marquez, M.A., et al.: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the “Spinal Cord Injury-Falls Concern Scale” in the Italian population. Spinal Cord 56, 712–718 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Galeoto, G., et al.: A psychometric properties evaluation of the Italian version of the Geriatric Depression Scale. Depression Res. Treat. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Murgia, M., et al.: Inter-and intra-interviewer reliability of Italian version of pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Ann. Ig. 30, 153–161 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berardi, A., et al.: The wheelchair use confidence scale: Italian translation, adaptation, and validation of the short form. Disabil. Rehabil. Assistive Technol. 13(6), 575–580

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tofani, M., et al.: The psychosocial impact of assistive device scales: Italian validation in a cohort of nonambulant people with neuromotor disorders. Assistive Technol., 1–6 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Galeoto, G., et al.: Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Van Lieshout test in an Italian population with cervical spinal cord injury: a psychometric study. Spinal Cord Ser. Cases 4(1), 49 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parente, M., Tofani, M., De Santis, R., Esposito, G., Santilli, V., Galeoto, G.: The role of the occupational therapist in disaster areas: systematic review. Occup Ther. Int. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Galeoto, G., et al.: Quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: Italian validation of the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39-IT). Neurol. Sci. 39(11), 1903–1909 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Galeoto, G., et al.: Construction and validation of a tool for the evaluation of environmental risks and limitations to the manual handling of loads: cross-sectional study. La Clinica Terapeutica 168(6), e349–e356 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Galeoto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Galeoto, G., Berardi, A., Pizzi, C., Farina, I., Sansoni, J. (2019). Evaluation of the Disciplinary Competences of the Students of the Bachelor’s Degree in Physiotherapy at “Sapienza” University of Rome Through the TECO: A Cross-Sectional Study. In: Uden, L., Liberona, D., Sanchez, G., Rodríguez-González, S. (eds) Learning Technology for Education Challenges. LTEC 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1011. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20798-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20798-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20797-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20798-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics