Skip to main content

Targeted Policing for Crime Reduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 10k Accesses

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

The public expects the police to be effective at controlling crime. A considerable amount of research evidence suggests that crime is highly concentrated at a small number of risky places and risky people and tends to be committed at particular times and days of the week. If police can target their resources on these risky people, places, and times, they will be more effective at reducing crime in their jurisdictions. A series of rigorous program evaluations have suggested that particular targeted policing strategies—problem-oriented policing, hot spots policing, and focused deterrence—generate crime reduction impacts. These strategies use crime analysis to ensure that police resources are appropriately targeted on specific crime problems. The strategies also encourage the police to blend strategic enforcement with alternative crime prevention measures through strategic partnerships with other government agencies, social service organizations, community groups, and residents, and to prevent crimes by addressing underlying conditions that give rise to ongoing crime problems. These kinds of targeted policing programs can improve police legitimacy by safeguarding against overly-aggressive and indiscriminate enforcement, promoting police partnerships with neighborhood residents and others, and reducing crime in communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andresen, M., & Malleson, N. (2011). Testing the stability of crime patterns: Implications for theory and policy. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1), 58–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apel, R., & Nagin, D. (2011). General deterrence: A review of recent evidence. In J. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime and public policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, C., & Block, R. (1993). Street gang crime in Chicago. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. (2004). Gun violence among serious youth offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. (2008). Problem-oriented policing and crime prevention (2nd ed.). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., Hureau, D., & Winship, D. (2008). Losing faith? Police, black churches, and the resurgence of youth violence in Boston. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 141–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., Kennedy, D., Waring, E., & Piehl, A. (2001). Problem-oriented policing, deterrence, and youth violence: An evaluation of Boston’s operation ceasefire. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(3), 195–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., McDevitt, J., & Pierce, G. (2006). Understanding and preventing gang violence: Problem analysis and response development in Lowell, Massachusetts. Police Quarterly, 9, 20–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., Papachristos, A., & Hureau, D. (2010). The concentration and stability of gun violence at micro places in Boston, 1980–2008. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., & Weisburd, D. (2010). Policing problem places: Crime hot spots and effective prevention. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., & Weisburd, D. (2015). Focused deterrence and the prevention of violent gun injuries: Practice, theoretical principles, and scientific evidence. Annual Review of Public Health, 36, 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., Weisburd, D., & Turchan, B. (2018). Focused deterrence strategies and crime control: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(1), 205–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., & Weisburd, D. (2006). Problem-oriented policing: The disconnect between principles and practice. In D. Weisburd & A. Braga (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., Welsh, B., & Schnell, C. (2015). Can policing disorder reduce crime? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52, 567–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., Turchan, B., Hureau, D., & Papachristos, A. In press. Hot spots policing and crime reduction: An update of an ongoing systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. & Kennedy, D. (2012). Linking situational crime prevention and focused deterrence strategies. In N. Tilley & G. Farrell (Eds.), The reasoning criminologist: Essays in honour of Ronald V. Clarke. Taylor & Francis: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., & Weisburd, D. (2012). The effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(3), 323–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, R. (2015). Focused deterrence and improved police-community relations: Unpacking the proverbial “black box”. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 507–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capowich, G., & Roehl, J. (1994). Problem-oriented policing: Actions and effectiveness in San Diego. In D. Rosenbaum (Ed.), The challenge of community policing: Testing promises. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, J., & Chaiken, M. (1982). Varieties of criminal behavior. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. (1997). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies. Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. (1998). Defining police strategies: Problem solving, problem-oriented policing and community-oriented policing. In T. O’Connor & A. Grant (Eds.), Problem-oriented policing: crime-specific problems, critical issues, and making POP work. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R., & Weisburd, D. (1994). Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 165–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, E. (1990). Weather and crime. British Journal of Criminology, 30, 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P. J. (2009). Robbery. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of crime and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordner, G., & Biebel, E. (2005). Problem-oriented policing in practice. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 155–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Curman, A., Andresen, M., & Brantingham, P. J. (2015). Crime and place: A longitudinal examination of street segment patterns in Vancouver, BC. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(1), 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deuchar, R. (2013). Policing youth violence: Transatlantic connections. London, UK: IEP Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S., & Nagin, D. (2011). Imprisonment and crime: Can both be reduced? Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 13–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E., & Spelman, W. (1987). Problem-solving: Problem-oriented policing in Newport News. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R., Corsaro, N., & Ozer, M. M. (2017). The impact of police on criminal justice reform: Evidence from Cincinnati, Ohio. Criminology & Public Policy, 16, 375–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epp, C., Maynard-Moody, S., & Haider-Markel, D. (2014). Pulled over: How police stops define race and citizenship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J., Geller, A., Davies, G., & West, V. (2010). Street stops and broken windows revisited: The demography and logic of proactive policing in a safe and changing city. In S. Rice & M. White (Eds.), Race, ethnicity, and policing: New and essential readings. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, G., & Pease, K. (1993). Once bitten, twice bitten: Repeat victimization and its implications for crime prevention. London, UK: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, G. (1995). Preventing repeat victimization. In M. Tonry & D. Farrington (Eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention. Crime and justice: A review of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. (2006). Crime and nature. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M., & Poulsen, E. (2003). Simple indicators of crime by time of day. International Journal of Forecasting, 19, 595–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, D., Chatterton, M., & Pease, K. (1988). The Kirkholt Burglary prevention project. London, UK: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, D., Frenz, S., & O’Connell, M. (1990). The Kirkholt burglary prevention project: Phase II, crime prevention unit paper 23. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. (1975). Crime, punishment, and deterrence. New York: Elsevier Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1979). Improving policing: A problem-oriented approach. Crime & Delinquency, 25(2), 236–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M., Gottfredson, M., & Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J., & Griffiths, E. (2016). Gangs in America’s communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (2015). The eternal criminal record. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (2008). Deterrence and crime prevention: Reconsidering the prospect of sanction. London, UK: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (2011). Don’t shoot: One man, a street fellowship, and the end of violence in inner-city America. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D., Kleiman, M., & Braga, A. (2017). Beyond deterrence: Strategies of focus and fairness. In N. Tilley & A. Sidebottom (Eds.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D., Piehl, A., & Braga, A. (1996). Youth violence in Boston: Gun markets, serious youth offenders, and a use-reduction strategy. Law & Contemporary Problems, 59, 147–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D., & Wong, S. (2009). The High Point drug market intervention strategy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koper, C. (1995). Just enough police presence: Reducing crime and disorderly behavior by optimizing patrol time in crime hotspots. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 649–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. (1971). Policing the city: Boston 1822–1855. New York, NY: Antheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J., & Sampson, R. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Eck, J., SooHyun, O., & Martinez, N. (2017). How concentrated is crime at places? A systematic review from 1970 to 2015. Crime Science 6, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-017-0069-x.

  • Maple, J. (1999). The crime fighter: How you can make your community crime-free. New York, NY: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, N., Lee, Y., Eck, J., & SooHyun, O. (2017). Ravenous wolves revisited: A systematic review of offending concentration. Crime Science 6, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-017-0072-2.

  • Mastrofski, S., & Fridell, L. n.d. Police departments’ adoption of innovative practice: National Police Research Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarrell, E., Chermak, S., Wilson, J., & Corsaro, N. (2006). Reducing homicide through a “lever-pulling” strategy. Justice Quarterly 23, 214–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meares, T. (2009). The legitimacy of police among young African American men. Marquette Law Review, 92, 651–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. (1975). Violence by youth gangs and youth groups as a crime problem in major American cities. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D., Solow, R., & Lum, C. (2015). Deterrence, criminal opportunities, and police. Criminology, 53, 74–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. (2013). Deterrence in the 21st century. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice in American, 1975–2015. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papachristos, A., Braga, A., & Hureau, D. (2012). Social networks and the risk of gunshot injury. Journal of Urban Health, 89(6), 992–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papachristos, A., Meares, T., & Fagan, J. (2007). Attention felons: Evaluating project safe neighborhoods in Chicago. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 223–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R. (1987). The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly, 4, 173–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pease, K. (1991). The Kirkholt project: Preventing burglary on a British public housing estate. Security Journal, 2, 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, G., Spaar, S., & Briggs, L. (1988). The character of police work: Strategic and tactical implications. Boston, MA: Northeastern University, Center for Applied Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Police Executive Research Forum. (2008). Violent crime in America: What we know about hot spots enforcement. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final report of the president’s task force on 21st century policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, J. (2014). What is the future … of predictive policing? Translational Criminology, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, T., & Tilley, N. (2000). Not rocket science? Problem-solving and crime reduction. Crime reduction series paper 6. Home Office: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reaves, B. (2015). Local police departments, 2013. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reppetto, T. (1976). Crime prevention and the displacement phenomenon. Crime & Delinquency, 22, 166–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, J., & Stone, D. (1996). The experience of violent injury for young African-American men: The meaning of being a ‘sucker’. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 11, 77–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolph, J., Chaiken, J., & Houchens, R. (1981). Methods for estimating the crime rates of individuals. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L., Gartin, P., & Buerger, M. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L., & Weisburd, David. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime hot spots: A randomized controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12, 625–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W., & Frydl, K. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SooHyun, O., Martinez, N., Lee, Y., & Eck, J. (2017). How concentrated is crime among victims? A systematic review from 1970 to 2014. Crime Science 6, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-017-0069-x.

  • Spelman, W. (1990). Repeat offender programs. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelman, W., & Eck, J. E. (1989). Sitting ducks, ravenous wolves, and helping hands: New approaches to urban policing. Public Affairs Comment, 35, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tita, G., Riley, K., & Greenwood, P. (2003). From Boston to Boyle heights: The process and prospects of a ‘pulling levers’ strategy in a Los Angeles barrio. In S. Decker (Ed.), Policing gangs and youth violence. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tita, G., Riley, J., Ridgeway, G., Grammich, C., Abrahamse, A., & Greenwood, P. (2004). Reducing gun violence: Results from an intervention in East Los Angeles. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. Annual American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 593, 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 53(2), 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Bernasco, W., & Bruinsma, G. (2009a). Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in geographic criminology. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Braga, A., Groff, E., & Wooditch, A. (2017). Can hot spots policing reduce crime in large urban areas? An agent based simulation. Criminology, 55, 137–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., & Yang, S. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42, 283–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (1995). Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City DMA experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 711–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., & Majmundar, M. (2018). Proactive policing: Effects on crime and communities. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Mastrofski, S., McNally, A., Greenspan, R., & Willis, J. (2003). Reforming to preserve: Compstat and strategic problem solving in American policing. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 421–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Morris, N., & Groff, E. (2009b). Hot spots of juvenile crime: A longitudinal study of arrest incidents at street segments in Seattle, Washington. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Telep, C., Hinkle, J., & Eck, J. E. (2010). Is problem-oriented policing effective in reducing crime and disorder: Findings from a Campbell systematic review. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(1), 139–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L., Ready, J., Eck, J. E., Hinkle, J., & Gajewski, F. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44, 549–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. & Kelling, G. (1982). The police and neighborhood safety: Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly 127:29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M., Figlio, R., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J., & Petersilia, J. (2016). Keeping track: Surveillance, control, and the expansion of the carceral state. Harvard Law Review, 129, 1318–1360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. (1981). Kids, groups and crime: Some implications of a well-known secret. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72(3), 867–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F., & Hawkins, G. (1973). Deterrence: The legal threat in crime control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony A. Braga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Braga, A.A., Barao, L. (2019). Targeted Policing for Crime Reduction. In: Krohn, M., Hendrix, N., Penly Hall, G., Lizotte, A. (eds) Handbook on Crime and Deviance. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20779-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20779-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20778-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20779-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics