Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Windell NortjeEmail author
  • Noëlle Quénivet
Chapter
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

After summarising the key findings of the study, this chapter brings the conversation back to two points. Firstly, it reiterates the legal and ethical importance that alleged perpetrators of international crimes be able to invoke defences and have a fair chance for such a defence to be successful. Secondly, it stresses that the dual status of children as victims and as perpetrators must be better understood when applying defences, and especially duress, under international criminal law. More fundamentally, this chapter argues that an approach that takes better account of the complex situation in which some alleged perpetrators are placed must be applied to any adult in a similar position. The findings of the study go beyond the narrow set of child soldiers and have wider significance.

References

  1. Amann, D.M., 2011–2012, ‘Calling Children to Account: The Proposal for a Juvenile Chamber in the Special Court for Sierra Leone’, 29 Pep.L.Rev. 167–185.Google Scholar
  2. Ambos, K., 2013, Treatise on International Criminal Law: Volume I: Foundations and General Part (OUP).Google Scholar
  3. Bond, J. and M. Fougere, 2014, ‘Omnipresent Threats: A Comment on the Defence of Duress in International Criminal Law’, 14 Int.C.L.R. 471–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Branch, A., 2017, ‘Dominic Ongwen on Trial: The ICC’s African Dilemmas’, 11 I.J.T.J. 30–49.Google Scholar
  5. Crane, D.M., 2008, ‘Prosecuting Children in Times of Armed Conflict: The West African Experience’, 15 H.R.B. 11–17.Google Scholar
  6. Cryer, C., et al., 2014, An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (3rd edn., CUP).Google Scholar
  7. Drumbl, M., 2012, Reimagining Child Soldiers in International Law and Policy (OUP).Google Scholar
  8. Fisher, K.J., 2013, Transitional Justice for Child Soldiers. Accountability and Social Reconstruction in Post-conflict Contexts (Palgrave).Google Scholar
  9. Fletcher, G.P., 1998, Basic Concepts of Criminal Law (OUP).Google Scholar
  10. ICC Ongwen, 2016, Situation in Uganda in the Case of Prosecutor v. Ongwen, International Criminal Court, Decision on the Confirmation of Charges against Dominic Ongwen (Public Redacted), Case No. ICC-02/04-01/15, 23 March 2016.Google Scholar
  11. ICC Statute, 1998, Statute of the International Criminal Court, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.183/9, (1998) 2187 UNTS 90.Google Scholar
  12. ICTY Erdemović, 1997, Prosecutor v. Erdemović, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Judgment, Case No. IT-96-22-T, 7 October 1997.Google Scholar
  13. Kochhar, S. and M. Hieramente, 2016, ‘Of Fallen Demons: Reflections on the International Criminal Court’s Defendant’, 29 L.J.I.L. 223–244.Google Scholar
  14. Mohamed, S., 2015a, ‘Deviance, Aspiration, and the Stories We Tell: Reconciling Mass Atrocity and the Criminal Law’, 124 Yale L.J. 1628–1689.Google Scholar
  15. Mohamed, S., 2015b, ‘Of Monsters and Men: Perpetrator Trauma and Mass Atrocity’, 115 Colum.L.Rev. 1157–1216.Google Scholar
  16. Olusanya, O., 2010, ‘Excuse and Mitigation under International Criminal Law: Redrawing Conceptual Boundaries’, 13 New Crim.L.Rev. 23–89.Google Scholar
  17. Rauschenbach, M., 2018, ‘Individuals Accused of International Crimes as Delegitimized Agents of Truth’, 28 Int.Crim. Justice Rev. 291–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Siegrist, S., 2006, ‘Child Participation in International Criminal Accountability Mechanisms: The Case of the Sierra Leone Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, in Arts, K. and V. Popovski (eds), International Criminal Accountability and the Rights of Children (Asser Press) 53–66.Google Scholar
  19. UNICEF, 2010, Children and Transitional Justice. Truth-Telling, Accountability and Reconciliation, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre and Human Rights Program.Google Scholar
  20. Wessells, M., 2004, ‘Psychosocial Issues in Reintegrating Child Soldiers’, 37 Cornell Int’l L.J. 513–525.Google Scholar
  21. Wessells, M., 2006, Child Soldiers: From Violence to Protection (HUP).Google Scholar
  22. Wiener, N., 2014, ‘Excuses, Justifications, and Duress at the International Criminal Tribunals’, 26 Pace Int’l L.Rev. 88–131.Google Scholar
  23. Yee, S., 1997, ‘The Erdemovic Sentencing Judgement: A Questionable Milestone for the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’, 26 Ga.J.Int’l & Comp.L. 263–309.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of the Western CapeCape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Bristol Law SchoolUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations