Advertisement

Duress as an Excuse Defence for International Crimes

  • Windell NortjeEmail author
  • Noëlle Quénivet
Chapter
  • 106 Downloads

Abstract

The application of duress as a justification defence by national and international criminal tribunals has resulted largely in a number of accused failing to invoke successfully the defence. This chapter therefore examines the application of duress as an excuse as opposed to a justification defence. By revisiting and applying duress as an excuse rather than a justification, an interpretation of the defence of duress in a way that more accurately reflects the reality faced by child soldiers is explored. This would enable child soldiers as well as adult perpetrators to invoke it more or less successfully in armed conflict. Nonetheless, many child soldiers would still find it difficult to raise duress as a complete defence due to the application of the strict criteria of duress under international criminal law. Therefore, even if interpreted in a different light, duress is not the ultimate defence as so often claimed by legal scholars.

References

  1. Achton Thomas, M., 2013, ‘Malice Supplies the Age? Assessing the Culpability of Adolescent Soldiers’, 44 Cal.W.Int’l L.J. 1–38.Google Scholar
  2. Akakpo, L., 2012, ‘Procureur c. X: les enseignements à tirer de la poursuite des enfants soldats pour crimes contre l’humanité’, 42 R.G.D. 9–56.Google Scholar
  3. Akande, D., 2012, ‘The Effect of Security Council Resolutions and Domestic Proceedings on State Obligations to Cooperate with the ICC’, 10 J.Int’l Crim.Just. 299–324.Google Scholar
  4. Ambos, K., 1999, ‘General Principles of Criminal Law in the Rome Statute’, 10 Crim.L.F. 1–32.Google Scholar
  5. Ambos, K., 2013, Treatise on International Criminal Law: Volume I: Foundations and General Part (OUP).Google Scholar
  6. Amnesty International, 2000, Child Soldiers. Criminals or Victims?, AI Index: IOR 50/02/00, December 2000.Google Scholar
  7. Baines, E., 2009, ‘Complex Political Perpetrators: Reflections on Dominic Ongwen’, 47 J.Mod.Afr.Stud. 163–191.Google Scholar
  8. Baines, E. and O. Boniface, 2008, ‘Complicating Victims and Perpetrators in Uganda: On Dominic Ongwen’, 7 Justice and Reconciliation Project Field Note (July) 1–19.Google Scholar
  9. Bassiouni, M.C., 2013, Introduction to International Criminal Law (2nd edn., Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
  10. Ben-Naftali, O., 2009, ‘Goldstein (Cr. C. 93/52) Attorney General v. Goldstein, Israel, District Court, Tel-Aviv, 15 July 1953, unpublished’, in Cassese, A. (ed.), Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (OUP) 696–696.Google Scholar
  11. Berman, M.N., 2003, ‘Justification and Excuse, Law and Morality’, 53 Duke L.J. 1–77.Google Scholar
  12. Bond, J. and M. Fougere, 2014, ‘Omnipresent Threats: A Comment on the Defence of Duress in International Criminal Law’, 14 Int.C.L.R. 471–512.Google Scholar
  13. Boyden, B., 2003, ‘The Moral Development of Child Soldiers: What Do Adults Have to Fear?’, 9 Peace Confl. 343–362.Google Scholar
  14. Brett, R. and I. Specht, 2004, Young Soldiers: Why They Choose to Fight (Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
  15. Brooks, R., 2016, How Everything Became War and the Military Became Everything (Simon and Schuster Paperbacks).Google Scholar
  16. Burchard, C., 2009, ‘Gestapo Informer Case’, in Cassese, A. (ed.), Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (OUP) 693.Google Scholar
  17. Byrd, B.S., 1987, ‘Wrongdoing and Attribution: Implications beyond the Justification—Excuse Distinction’, 33 Wayne L.Rev. 1289–1342.Google Scholar
  18. Carr, C.L., 1991, ‘Duress and Criminal Responsibility’, 10 Law and Philosophy 161–188.Google Scholar
  19. Cassese, A., et al., 2013, Cassese’s International Criminal Law (3rd edn., OUP).Google Scholar
  20. Charter of the International Military Tribunal, 1945, in Agreement for the Prosecution and Punishment of the Major War Criminals of the European Axis (London Agreement), 82 UNTS 280, 8 August 1945.Google Scholar
  21. Charter of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, 1946, Special Proclamation by the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers at Tokyo, TIAS No. 1589, 19 January 1946.Google Scholar
  22. Chiesa, L.E., 2008, ‘Duress, Demanding Heroism and Proportionality’, 41 Vand.J.Transnat’l L. 714–773.Google Scholar
  23. Colvin, E., 1990, ‘Exculpatory Defences in Criminal Law’, 10 O.J.L.S. 381–407.Google Scholar
  24. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 1948, General Assembly Resolution 260 A (III), 9 December 1948.Google Scholar
  25. Coomaraswamy, R., 2012, ‘Protecting Children in Situations of Armed Conflict: Interview with Radhika Coomaraswamy’, 4 Journal of Human Rights Practice 155–163.Google Scholar
  26. Criminal Code of Bosnia Herzegovina, available at http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/files/docs/zakoni/en/krivicni_zakon_3_03_-_eng.pdf (last visited 1 August 2019).
  27. Cryer, C., et al., 2014, An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (3rd edn., CUP).Google Scholar
  28. Degan, V.-D., 2005, ‘On the Sources of International Criminal Law’, 4 Chinese J.I.L. 45–83.Google Scholar
  29. Derluyn, I., et al., 2004, ‘Post-traumatic Stress in Former Ugandan Child Soldiers’, 363 The Lancet 861–863.Google Scholar
  30. Dinstein, Y., 1985, ‘International Criminal Law’, 20 Isr.L.Rev. 206–242.Google Scholar
  31. Dinstein, Y., 2000, ‘Defences’, in McDonald, G.K. and O. Swaak-Goldman (eds) Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law: The Experience of International and National Courts, Volume I: Commentary (Kluwer) 371–388.Google Scholar
  32. Dressler, J., 1988–1989, ‘Exegesis of the Law of Duress: Justifying the Excuse and Searching for its Proper Limits’, 62 S.Cal.L.Rev. 1331–1386.Google Scholar
  33. Drumbl, M., 2012, Reimagining Child Soldiers in International Law and Policy (OUP).Google Scholar
  34. Drumbl, M., 2014–2015, ‘Children, Armed Violence and Transition: Challenges for International Law and Policy’, 43 Ga.J.Int’l. & Comp.L. 623–627.Google Scholar
  35. Drumbl, M., 2016, ‘Victims who Victimise’, 4 Lond.Rev.Int. Law 217–246.Google Scholar
  36. Drumbl, M.A., 2015, ‘The Ongwen Trial at the ICC: Tough Questions on Child Soldiers’, Open Democracy, 14 April 2015, available at https://www.opendemocracy.net/openglobalrights/mark-drumbl/ongwen-trial-at-icc-toughquestions-on-child-soldiers (last visited 2 September 2018).Google Scholar
  37. Dumas, H., 2014, ‘Enfants victimes, enfants tueurs. Expériences enfantines (Rwanda, 1994)’, 2 Vingtième Siècle. Revue d’histoire 75–86.Google Scholar
  38. East Timor Tribunal X, 2002, Prosecutor v. ‘X’, East Timorese Public Administration, Dili District Court, Special Panel for Serious Crimes, Case No. 04/2002, 2 December 2002.Google Scholar
  39. ECCC Nuon et al., 2011, Prosecutor v. Nuon et al., Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Decision on IENG Sary’s Rule 89 Preliminary Objections (Ne Bis In Idem and Amnesty and Pardon), Case No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, D51/15, 3 November 2011.Google Scholar
  40. Ehrenreich Brooks, R., 2002–2003, ‘Law in the Heart of Darkness: Atrocity & Duress’, 43 Va.J.Int’l J. 861–888.Google Scholar
  41. Elliott, C., 2000, ‘A Comparative Analysis of Defences in English and French Criminal Law’, 8 Eur.J.Crime Cr.L.Cr.J. 319–326.Google Scholar
  42. Fisher, K.J., 2013, Transitional Justice for Child Soldiers. Accountability and Social Reconstruction in Post-conflict Contexts (Palgrave).Google Scholar
  43. Fisk, R., 2018, ‘Whether Armenia, the Nazis or Isis—If You’re Going to Commit Genocide, You Can’t Do it Without the Help of Local People’, The Independent, 24 May 2018, available at https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/armenia-genocide-nazi-germany-poland-isis-looting-war-a8367071.html (last visited 17 July 2018).
  44. Fletcher, G.P., 1998, Basic Concepts of Criminal Law (OUP).Google Scholar
  45. Fletcher, G.P., 2000, Rethinking Criminal Law (OUP).Google Scholar
  46. Fournet, C., 2008, ‘When the Child Surpasses the Father—Admissible Defences in International Criminal Law’, 8 Int.C.L.R. 509–532.Google Scholar
  47. France Papon, 1996, Papon Case, Cour d’appel de Bordeaux, Chambre d’accusation, Judgment No. 806, 18 September 1996, available at http://www.haguejusticeportal.net/Docs/NLP/France/Papon_acte_accusation_18_09_96.pdf (last visited 2 August 2018).
  48. Freeland, S., 2005, ‘Child Soldiers and International Crimes—How Should International Law Be Applied?’, 3 N.Z.J.P.I.L. 303–328.Google Scholar
  49. Frulli, M., 2004, ‘The Question of Charles Taylor’s Immunity: Still in Search of a Balanced Application of Personal Immunities?’, 4 J.Int’l Crim.Just. 1118–1129.Google Scholar
  50. Frulli, M., 2013, ‘Piercing the Veil of Head-of-State Immunity: The Taylor Trial and Beyond’, in Jalloh, C.C. (ed.), The Sierra Leone Special Court and Its Legacy. The Impact for Africa and International Criminal Law (CUP) 325–339.Google Scholar
  51. Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, 1949, 75 UNTS 31, 12 August 1949.Google Scholar
  52. Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of the Armed Forces at Sea, 1949, 75 UNTS 85, 12 August 1949.Google Scholar
  53. Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, 1949, 75 UNTS 287, 12 August 1949.Google Scholar
  54. Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 1949, 75 UNTS 135, 12 August 1949.Google Scholar
  55. Germany Gestapo Informer, 1949, Gestapo Informer Case, Oberlandsgericht Freiburg i. Br., Ss 64/48, Hoechstrichterliche Entscheidungen, Sammlung von Entscheidungen der Oberlandesgerichte und der Oberststen Gerichte in Strafsachen, Volume 2, 200–203, 17 February 1949.Google Scholar
  56. Gilbert, J., 2006, ‘Justice Not Revenge: The International Criminal Court and the “Grounds to Exclude Criminal Responsibility”—Defences or Negation of Criminality?’, 10 I.J.H.R. 143–160.Google Scholar
  57. Grant, N., 2016, Duress as a Defence for Former Child Soldiers? Dominic Ongwen and the International Criminal Court, International Crimes Database Brief 21, December 2016.Google Scholar
  58. Greenawalt, A.K.A., 2011, ‘The Pluralism of International Criminal Law’, 86 Ind.L.J. 1063–1130.Google Scholar
  59. Greppi, E., 1999, ‘The Evolution of Individual Criminal Responsibility under International Law’, 835 I.R.R.C. 531–553.Google Scholar
  60. Haer, R. and T. Böhmelt, 2016, ‘Child Soldiers as Time Bombs? Adolescents’ Participation in Rebel Groups and the Recurrence of Armed Conflict’, 22 Eur.J.Int.Relat. 406–436.Google Scholar
  61. Hall, C.K. and K. Ambos, 2016, ‘Article 7: Crimes Against Humanity’, in Triffterer, O. and K. Ambos (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (3rd edn., Beck) 144–294.Google Scholar
  62. Happold, M., 2003, ‘Excluding Children from Refugee Status: Child Soldiers and Article 1F of the Refugee Convention’, 24 Am.U.Int’l L.Rev. 1131–1176.Google Scholar
  63. Happold, M., 2006, ‘The Age of Criminal Responsibility for International Crimes under International Law’, in Arts, K. and V. Popovski (eds), International Criminal Accountability and the Rights of Children (Asser Press) 69–84.Google Scholar
  64. Heim, S.J., 2013, ‘The Applicability of the Duress Defense to the Killing of Innocent Persons by Civilians’, 46 Cornell Int’l L.J. 165–190.Google Scholar
  65. Horovitz, S., et al., 2014, ‘The International Criminal Court’, in Shany, Y. (ed.), Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts (OUP) 223–252.Google Scholar
  66. Huyghebaert, P., 2009, ‘Les enfants dans les conflits armés: une analyse à l’aune des notions de vulnérabilité, de pauvreté et de “capabilités”’, 2 Mondes en développement 59–72.Google Scholar
  67. Iacono, M., 2002, ‘The Child Soldiers of Sierra Leone: Are they Accountable for their Actions in War?’, 26 Suffolk Transnat’l L.Rev. 445–467.Google Scholar
  68. ICC Al-Bashir, 2019, Prosecutor v. Al-Bashir, International Criminal Court, Judgment in the Jordan Referral re A-Bashir Appeal, Case No. ICC-02/05-01/09 OA2, 6 May 2019.Google Scholar
  69. ICC Gaddafi, 2019, Prosecutor v. Gaddafi, International Criminal Court, Decision on the ‘Admissibility Challenge by Dr. Saif Al-Islam Gadafi pursuant to Articles 17(1)(c), 19 and 20(3) of the Rome Statute’, Case No. ICC-01/11-01/11, 5 April 2019.Google Scholar
  70. ICC Rules of Procedure and Evidence, 2013, ICC-ASP/1/3 and Corr.1, available at https://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/pids/legal-texts/rulesprocedureevidenceeng.pdf (last visited 10 March 2019).
  71. ICC Statute, 1998, Statute of the International Criminal Court, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.183/9, (1998) 2187 UNTS 90.Google Scholar
  72. ICRC, 2007, The Paris Commitments to Protect Children from Unlawful Recruitment or Use by Armed Forces or Armed Groups, consolidated version, February 2007, available at http://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/the-paris-commitments.pdf (last visited 1 August 2018).
  73. ICRC, 2019, Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law, available at https://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_cha_chapter44_rule158 (last visited 31 July 2018).
  74. ICTY Erdemović, 1997, Prosecutor v. Erdemović, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Judgment, Case No. IT-96-22-A, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Cassese, 7 October 1997.Google Scholar
  75. ICTY Milošević, 2001a, Prosecutor v. Milošević, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Initial Indictment, Case No. IT-01-50-I, 8 October 2001.Google Scholar
  76. ICTY Milošević, 2001b, Prosecutor v. Milošević, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Initial Indictment, Case No. IT-01-51-I, 22 November 2001.Google Scholar
  77. ICTY Milošević et al., 2001, Prosecutor v. Milošević et al., International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Initial Indictment, Case No. IT-99-37-I, 22 May 1999, First Amended Indictment, 29 June 2001 and Second Amended Indictment, Case No. IT-99-37-PT, 16 October 2001.Google Scholar
  78. ICTY Orić, 2006, Prosecutor v. Orić, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Judgment, Case No. IT-03-68-T, 30 June 2006.Google Scholar
  79. ILC, 1950, Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, International Law Commission, 1950, available at http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/7_1_1950.pdf (last visited 10 March 2019).
  80. International Military Tribunal, 1946, ‘Judgment, Nuremberg, 1 October 1946’, 41 A.J.I.L. 172–306.Google Scholar
  81. Italy Priebke, 1955, Priebke Case, Military Tribunal, Ordinanza del Giudice per l’Udienza Preliminare presso il Tribunale Militare di Roma, 7 December 1995, available at http://www.asser.nl/upload/documents/DomCLIC/Docs/NLP/Italy/Priebke_OrderPreliminaryAudience_7-12-1995.pdf (last visited 2 September 2018).
  82. Joyce, M., 2015, ‘Duress: From Nuremberg to the International Criminal Court, Finding the Balance between Justification and Excuse’, 28 L.J.I.L. 623–642.Google Scholar
  83. Kittichaisaree, K., 2001, International Criminal Law (OUP).Google Scholar
  84. Klasen, F., et al., 2015, ‘The Guiltless Guilty: Trauma-Related Guilt and Psychopathology in Former Ugandan Child Soldiers’, 46 Child Psychiatry Hum.Dev. 180–193.Google Scholar
  85. Knoops, G.A., 2008, Defenses in Contemporary International Criminal Law (Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
  86. Kochhar, S. and M. Hieramente, 2016, ‘Of Fallen Demons: Reflections on the International Criminal Court’s Defendant’, 29 L.J.I.L. 223–244.Google Scholar
  87. Krebs, B., 2013, ‘Justification and Excuse in Article 31(1) of the Rome Statute’, 2 C.J.I.C.L. 382–410.Google Scholar
  88. Kurt, Ü., 2018, ‘Theatres of Violence on the Ottoman Periphery: Exploring the Local Roots of Genocidal Policies in Antep’, (Online) J. Genocide Res. 1–21.Google Scholar
  89. Lafayette, E., 2012–2013, ‘The Prosecution of Child Soldiers: Balancing Accountability with Justice’, 63 Syracuse L.Rev. 297–325.Google Scholar
  90. Legislating the Criminal Code: Offences Against the Person and General Principles (Law Com. No. 218, 1993), available at http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/app/uploads/2015/06/lc218.pdf (last visited 17 March 2019).
  91. Linton, S. and C. Reiger, 2001, ‘The Evolving Jurisprudence and Practice of East Timor’s Special Panels for Serious Crimes on Admissions of Guilt, Duress and Superior Orders’, 4 Y.I.H.L. 167–212.Google Scholar
  92. Lippman, M., 1992, ‘The Other Nuremberg: American Prosecutions of Nazi War Criminals in Occupied Germany’, 3 Ind.Int’l & Comp.L.Rev. 1–100.Google Scholar
  93. Macdonald, A. and H. Porter, 2016, ‘The Trial of Thomas Kwoyelo: Opportunity or Spectre? Reflections from the Ground on the First LRA Prosecution’, 86 Africa 698–722.Google Scholar
  94. Maclure, R. and M. Denov, 2006, ‘“I Didn’t Want to Die So I Joined Them”: Structuration and the Process of Becoming Boy Soldiers in Sierra Leone’, 18 Terror. Political Violence 119–135.Google Scholar
  95. Manirakiza, P., 2008–2009, ‘Les enfants face au système international de justice: à la recherche d’un modèle de justice pénale internationale pour les délinquants mineurs’, 34 Queen’s L.J. 719–768.Google Scholar
  96. Mohamed, S., 2015, ‘Of Monsters and Men: Perpetrator Trauma and Mass Atrocity’, 115 Colum.L.Rev. 1157–1216.Google Scholar
  97. Nagle, L.E., 2011, ‘Child Soldiers and the Duty of Nations to Protect Children from Participation in Armed Conflict’, 19 Cardozo J.Int’l & Comp.L. 1–58.Google Scholar
  98. Naylor, M., 2006, ‘Resistance Is Futile: Duress as a Defence to Intentional Killing’, 2 C.S.L.R. 24–32.Google Scholar
  99. Nortje, W., 2017, ‘Victim or Villain: Exploring the Possible Bases of a Defence in the Ongwen Case at the International Criminal Court’, 17 Int.C.L.R. 186–207.Google Scholar
  100. Nouwen, S., 2005, ‘The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Immunity Defence Continued’, 18 L.J.I.L. 645–669.Google Scholar
  101. Nylund, B.V., 2016, Child Soldiers and Transitional Justice: Protecting the Rights of Children Involved in Armed Conflicts (Intersentia).Google Scholar
  102. Olusanya, O., 2010, ‘Excuse and Mitigation under International Criminal Law: Redrawing Conceptual Boundaries’, 13 New Crim.L.Rev. 23–89.Google Scholar
  103. Paciocco, D.M., 2010, ‘No-One Wants to Be Eaten: The Logic and Experience of the Law of Necessity and Duress’, 56 C.L.Q. 240–293.Google Scholar
  104. Paphiti, A.S., 1999, ‘Duress as Defence to War Crimes Charges’, 38 Mil.L.Rev. 247–298.Google Scholar
  105. Park, A.S.J., 2014, ‘Constituting Omar Khadr: Cultural Racism, Childhood, and Citizenship’, 8 Int. Political Sociol. 43–62.Google Scholar
  106. Posada, R. and C. Wainryb, 2008, ‘Moral Development in a Violent Society: Colombian Children’s Judgments in the Context of Survival and Revenge’, 79 Child Development 882–898.Google Scholar
  107. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Additional Protocol I), 1977, 1125 UNTS 3, 8 June 1977.Google Scholar
  108. Pruitt, W.R., 2014, ‘Aggravating and Mitigating Sentencing Factors at the ICTR: An Exploratory Analysis’, 14 Int.C.L.R. 148–176.Google Scholar
  109. Quénivet, N., 2017, ‘Does and Should International Law Prohibit the Prosecution of Children for War Crimes?’, 28 E.J.I.L. 433–455.Google Scholar
  110. Risacher, B.J., 2013–2014, ‘No Excuse: The Failure of the ICC’s Article 31 “Duress” Definition’, 89 Notre Dame L.Rev. 1403–1426.Google Scholar
  111. Roberts, R.C.E., 2012, ‘The Lubanga Trial Chamber’s Assessment of Evidence in Light of the Accused’s Right to the Presumption of Innocence’, 10 J.Int’l Crim.Just. 923–943.Google Scholar
  112. Robinson, D., 2013, ‘A Cosmopolitan Liberal Account of International Criminal Law’, 26 L.J.I.L. 127–153.Google Scholar
  113. Robinson, P.H., 1997, Structure and Function in Criminal Law (OUP).Google Scholar
  114. Roht-Arriaza, N., 1990, ‘State Responsibility to Investigate and Prosecute Grave Human Rights Violations in International Law’, 78 C.L.R. 449–513.Google Scholar
  115. Rosen, C.J., 1986, ‘The Excuse of Self-Defense: Correcting a Historical Accident on Behalf of Battered Women Who Kill’, 36 Am.U.L.Rev. 11–56.Google Scholar
  116. Sadat, L.N., 2006, ‘Exile, Amnesty and International Law’, 81 Notre Dame L.Rev. 955–1036.Google Scholar
  117. Sassòli, M., 2002, ‘State Responsibility for Violations of International Humanitarian Law’, 87 I.R.R.C. 401–434.Google Scholar
  118. Scaliotti, M., 2002, ‘Defences before the International Criminal Court: Substantive Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility—Part 2’, 2 Int.C.L.R 1–46.Google Scholar
  119. Schabas, W.A., 2016, The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute (2nd edn., OUP).Google Scholar
  120. Schabas, W.A., 2017, An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (5th edn., CUP).Google Scholar
  121. Schabas, W.A. and M.E. Zeidy, 2016, ‘Article 17: Issues of Admissibility’, in Triffterer, O. and K. Ambos (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (3rd edn., Beck) 781–831.Google Scholar
  122. Schmitt, M., 2011, ‘Investigating Violations of International Law in Armed Conflict’, 2 Harvard National Security Journal 31–84.Google Scholar
  123. SCSL Kallon and Kamara, 2004, Prosecution v. Kallon and Kamara, Special Court for Sierra Leone, Decision on Challenge to Jurisdiction: Lomé Accord Amnesty, Case Nos SCSL-2004-15-AR72(E) and SCSL-2004-16-AR72(E), 13 March 2004.Google Scholar
  124. SCSL Statute, 2002, Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, Enclosure to the Report of the Secretary–General on the Establishment of a Special Court for Sierra Leone, U.N. Doc. S/2000/915, 2178 UNTS 138, 16 January 2002.Google Scholar
  125. SCSL Taylor, 2004, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Special Court for Sierra Leone, Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Case No. SCSL-03-01-I-59, 31 May 2004.Google Scholar
  126. SCSL Taylor, 2013, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Special Court for Sierra Leone, Judgment, Case No. SCSL-03-01-A, 26 September 2013.Google Scholar
  127. Siegrist, S., 2006, ‘Child Participation in International Criminal Accountability Mechanisms: The Case of the Sierra Leone Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, in Arts, K. and V. Popovski (eds), International Criminal Accountability and the Rights of Children (Asser Press) 53–66.Google Scholar
  128. Singer, I.M., 2013, ‘Reductio ad absurdum: The Kapo Trial Judgements’ Contribution to International Criminal Law Jurisprudence and Customary International Law’, 24 Crim.L.F. 235–258.Google Scholar
  129. Singer, P., 2005, Children at War (Pantheon Books).Google Scholar
  130. Sinha, G.A., 2013, ‘Child Soldiers as Super-Privileged Combatants’, 17 I.J.H.R. 584–603.Google Scholar
  131. Smeulers, A., 2008, ‘Punishing the Enemies of All Mankind’, 21 L.J.I.L. 971–993.Google Scholar
  132. Smith, J.C., 1989, The Hamlyn Lectures: Justification and Excuse in the Criminal Law (40th series, Stevens and Sons).Google Scholar
  133. Souris, R.N., 2017, ‘Child Soldiering on Trial: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Responsibility in the Lord’s Resistance Army’, 13 Int.J.L.C. 316–335.Google Scholar
  134. Triffterer, O. and C. Burchard, 2016, ‘Article 27: Irrelevance of Official Capacity’, in Triffterer, O. and K. Ambos (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (3rd edn., Beck) 1037–1055.Google Scholar
  135. Triffterer, O. and R.S. Clark, 2016, ‘Article 26: Exclusion of Jurisdiction over Persons under Eighteen’, in Triffterer, O. and K. Ambos (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (3rd edn., Beck) 1030–1036.Google Scholar
  136. Uganda Kwoyelo, 2015, Uganda v. Kwoyelo, Supreme Court, Constitutional Appeal No. 1 of 2012, 8 April 2015.Google Scholar
  137. UK Hudson, 1971, R. v. Hudson, House of Lords, [1971] 2 All E.R. 244 (Crim. App.).Google Scholar
  138. UNCRC, 1989, United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1577 UNTS 3, 20 November 1989.Google Scholar
  139. United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, 2007, General Comment No. 10: Children’s Rights in Juvenile Justice, U.N. Doc. CRC/C/GC.10, 25 April 2007.Google Scholar
  140. United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, 2009, Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 44 of the Convention. Concluding Observations: Democratic Republic of Congo, U.N. Doc. CRC/C/COD/CO/2, 10 February 2009.Google Scholar
  141. UNSC, 1997, United Nations Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, The Administration of Justice and the Human Rights of Detainees—Question of the Impunity of Perpetrators of Human Rights Violations (Civil and Political), Revised Final Report Prepared by Mr. Joinet pursuant to Sub-Commission Decision 1996/119, Annex II (Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights through Action to Combat Impunity), U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1997/20/Rev.1, 2 October 1997.Google Scholar
  142. UNSG, 2000, United Nations Secretary-General, Report on the Establishment of a Special Court for Sierra Leone, U.N. Doc. S/2000/915, 4 October 2000.Google Scholar
  143. UNSR, 2011, Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict, Children and Justice during and in the Aftermath of Armed Conflict, Working Paper No. 3, September 2011.Google Scholar
  144. UNTAET, 2001, Regulation 2001/25 on the Amendment of UNTAET Regulation No. 2000/11: On the Organization of Courts in East Timor and UNTAET Regulation No. 2000/30: On the Transitional Rules of Criminal Procedure, United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor, U.N. Doc. UNTAET/REG/2001/25, 14 September 2001.Google Scholar
  145. Ursini, B., 2015, ‘Prosecuting Child Soldiers: The Call for an International Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility’, 89 St John’s L.Rev. 1023–1048.Google Scholar
  146. US Einsatzgruppen, 1948, United States of America v. Ohlendorf (Einsatzgruppen), Military Tribunal, Opinion and Judgment, Case No. 9, 8–9 April 1948, available at http://www.worldcourts.com/imt/eng/decisions/1948.04.09_United_States_v_Ohlendorf.pdf (last visited 18 February 2019).
  147. US Flick et al., 1947, United States of America v. Flick et al., Military Tribunal, Judgment, Case No. 48, 20 April–22 December 1947, available at http://www.worldcourts.com/imt/eng/decisions/1947.12.22_United_States_v_Flick2.pdf (last visited 19 February 2019).
  148. US German High Command, 1947–1948, United States of America v. von Leeb and Thirteen Others, Military Tribunal, Judgment, Case No. 72, 30 December 1947–28 October 1948, available at http://www.worldcourts.com/imt/eng/decisions/1948.10.28_United_States_v_von_Leeb.pdf (last visited 10 March 2019).
  149. Valder, K., 2014, ‘A Stolen Childhood: A Look into the World of Female Child Soldiers and the Initiatives Targeting the Ending of the Practice’, 7 Alb.Gov.L.Rev. 34–55.Google Scholar
  150. Wainryb, C., 2011, ‘“And so they Ordered Me to Kill a Person”: Conceptualizing the Impacts of Child Soldiering on the Development of Moral Agency’, 54 Human Development 273–300.Google Scholar
  151. Wall, I.R., 2006, ‘Duress, International Criminal Law and Literature’, 4 J.I.C.J. 724–744.Google Scholar
  152. Warburton, I.-G., 2003, ‘The Commandeering of Free Will: Brainwashing as a Legitimate Defense’, 16 Capital Defense Journal 73–97.Google Scholar
  153. Waschefort, G., 2015, International Law and Child Soldiers (Hart).Google Scholar
  154. Weigend, T., 2011, ‘Germany’, in Heller, K.J. and M.D. Dubber (eds), The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law (SUP) 252–287.Google Scholar
  155. Werle, G. and F. Jessberger, 2014, Principles of International Criminal Law (3rd edn., OUP).Google Scholar
  156. Wessells, M., 2006, Child Soldiers: From Violence to Protection (HUP).Google Scholar
  157. Wiener, N., 2014, ‘Excuses, Justifications, and Duress at the International Criminal Tribunals’, 26 Pace Int’l L.Rev. 88–131.Google Scholar
  158. Williams, S., 2005, ‘Amnesties in International Law: The Experience of the Special Court for Sierra Leone’, 5 H.R.L.Rev. 271–309.Google Scholar
  159. Yee, S., 1997, ‘The Erdemovic Sentencing Judgement: A Questionable Milestone for the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’, 26 Ga.J.Int’l & Comp.L. 263–309.Google Scholar
  160. Zahar, A. and G. Sluiter, 2008, International Criminal Law (OUP).Google Scholar
  161. Zimmermann, A., 2016, ‘Article 5: Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court’, in Triffterer, O. and K. Ambos (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (3rd edn., Beck) 111–126.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of the Western CapeCape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Bristol Law SchoolUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations