Skip to main content

A Comparative Study on Load Balancing Algorithms in Software Defined Networking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ubiquitous Communications and Network Computing (UBICNET 2019)

Abstract

Advent of big data, cloud computing and IOTs resulted into significant increase in traffic on servers used in traditional networks as these networks are normally non-programmable, complex in management, highly expensive in nature, and have tightly coupled control plane with data plane. To overcome these traditional network-based issues a newly emerging technology software defined networking (SDN) has been introduced which decouples the data plane and control plane and makes the network fully programmable. SDN controllers are programmable so an efficient load balancing algorithms must ensure the effective management of resources as per client’s request. Based on these parameters i.e. throughput, transaction rate, & response time the qualitative comparison between the load balancing algorithms of SDN is done to generate the best results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kreutz, D., Ramos, F.M.V., Verissimo, P.E., Rothenberg, C.E., Azodolmolky, S., Uhlig, S.: Software-defined networking: a comprehensive survey. Proc. IEEE 103(1), 14–76 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xia, W., Wen, Y., Foh, C.H., Niyato, D., Xie, H.: A survey on software-defined networking. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 17(1), 27–51 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, H., Feamster, N.: Improving network management with software defined networking. IEEE Commun. Mag. 51(2), 114–119 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Neghabi, A.A., Navimipour, N.J., Hosseinzadeh, M., Rezaee, A.: Load balancing mechanisms in the software defined networks: a systematic and comprehensive review of the literature. IEEE Access 6, 14159–14178 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Qilin, M., Weikang, S.: A load balancing method based on SDN. In: 2015 Seventh International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA). IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Silva, W.J.A., Dias, K.L., Sadok, D.F.H.: A performance evaluation of software defined networking load balancers implementations. In: 2017 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN). IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deep, G., Hong, J.: Round robin load balancer using software defined networking (SDN). Capstone Team Res. Proj. 5, 1–9 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaur, S., Kumar, K., Singh, J., Ghumman, N.S.: Round-robin based load balancing in software defined networking. In: 2015 2nd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), pp. 2136–2139. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaur, S., Singh, J.: Implementation of server load balancing in software defined networking. In: Satapathy, S.C., Mandal, J.K., Udgata, S.K., Bhateja, V. (eds.) Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications. AISC, vol. 434, pp. 147–157. Springer, New Delhi (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2752-6_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaur, K., Kaur, S., Gupta, V.: Flow statistics based load balancing in OpenFlow. In: 2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI). IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaur, K., Kaur, S., Gupta, V.: Least time based weighted load balancing using software defined networking. In: Singh, M., Gupta, P.K., Tyagi, V., Sharma, A., Ören, T., Grosky, W. (eds.) ICACDS 2016. CCIS, vol. 721, pp. 309–314. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5427-3_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Mininet: “Mininet - An Instant Virtual Network on your Laptop (orother PC)” (2016). http://mininet.org/

  13. De Oliveira, R.L.S., Schweitzer, C.M., Shinoda, A.A., Prete, L.R.: Using mininet for emulation and prototyping software-defined networks. In: 2014 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koerner, M., Kao, O.: Multiple service load-balancing with OpenFlow. In: 2012 IEEE 13th International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR). IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Salman, O., Elhajj, I.H., Kayssi, A., Chehab, A.: SDN controllers: a comparative study. In: 2016 18th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaur, S., Singh, J., Ghumman, N.S.: Network programmability using POX controller. In: ICCCS International Conference on Communication, Computing & Systems, vol. 138. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Oliveira, B.T., Gabriel, L.B., Margi, C.B.: TinySDN: enabling multiple controllers for software-defined wireless sensor networks. IEEE Latin Am. Trans. 13(11), 3690–3696 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Mr. Sunit Kumar Nandi of NIT Arunachal Pradesh for helping us to understand the RYU controller functionalities and to learn the mininet emulator tool concepts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepak Gupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Joshi, N., Gupta, D. (2019). A Comparative Study on Load Balancing Algorithms in Software Defined Networking. In: Kumar, N., Venkatesha Prasad, R. (eds) Ubiquitous Communications and Network Computing. UBICNET 2019. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 276. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20615-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20615-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20614-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20615-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics