Abstract
The environment plays a vital role in ensuring quality of life for older people in the rural north. In this chapter, I examine how older people identify the characteristics of age-friendly environments in rural settings. “Age-friendly environment” can be understood in different ways: as a natural, human-built or social environment. Analysing interviews conducted in the Enontekiö region of northern Finland, I ascertain older people’s perceptions and understanding of what constitutes an age-friendly environment. In addition, I investigate the changes and challenges which older persons encounter in their daily lives that affect the potential of their environment to be age-friendly. The analysis reveals that the key elements of such an environment are good forest, land, fresh water, good connections with family, neighbours, and the community, and an accommodating built environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AARP (2005). Livable communities: an evaluation guide. Washington, DC: AARP, Public Policy Institute.
AARP (2010). Home and community preferences of the 45+ population. Washington, DC: AARP, Public Policy Institute.
Aarsæther, N. & Jørgen, B. (2001). Reflexive local development. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, pp. 15–17.
Abbott, P., & Sapsford, R. (2005). Living on the margins: Older people, place and social exclusion. Policy Studies, 26, 29–46.
AFRRCI. (2006). Age-friendly rural and remote communities: A guide. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/seniorsaines/altformats/pdf/publications/public/healthy-sante/age_friendly_rural/AFRRC_en.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2017.
AHDR-II. (2014). Arctic Human Development Report: Regional Processes and Global Linkages. Larsen, J.N.& Fondahl, G. (eds.). Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerråd.
Alley, D., Liebig, P., Pynoos, J., Banerjee, T., & Choi, I. H. (2007). Creating elder-friendly communities: Preparations for an aging society. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 49, 1–18.
Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English. Linguistics Research, 3(1).
Austin, C., Flux, D., Ghali, L., Hartley, D., Holinda, D., McClelland, R., Sieppert, J., & Wild, T. (2001). A place to call home: final report of the Elder Friendly Communities Project, 2001. http://www.calgary.ca/docgallery/bu/cns/elder_friendly_communities.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2017.
Bäck, M. A., & Calltorp, J. (2015). The Norrtaelje model: A unique model for integrated health and social care in Sweden. International Journal of Integrated Care, 15(6).
Balestrieri, M. (2016). Exploring the concept of rurality among university students in Sardinia. Rural Society, 25(2).
Begum, S. (2016). Livelihood transformation in the Nordic Arctic (Finnish Lapland): Effects on older people from a gender-based perspective. Polar Record, 52(2), 159–169.
Bubolz, M. M., & Sontag, M. S. (1993). Human ecology theory. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods, a contextual approach (pp. 419–448). New York: Plenum.
Chan, A. W., Chan, H. Y., Chan, I. K., Cheung, B. Y., & Lee, D. T. (2016). An age-friendly living environment as seen by Chinese older adults: A “Photovoice” study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(9), pii: E913. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13090913.
Chapman, S. A., & Peace, S. (2008). Rurality and ageing well: A long time here. In N. Keating (Ed.), Rural ageing: A good place to grow old? Bristol: Policy Press.
Clark, K., & Glicksman, A. (2012). Age-friendly Philadelphia: Bringing diverse networks together around aging issues. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 26, 121–136.
Copus, A., Perjo, L., Berlina, A., Jungsberg, L., Randall, L., & Sigurjónsdóttir, H. (2017). Social innovation in local development: Lessons from the Nordic countries and Scotland (p. 2). Sweden: Nordregio Working Paper.
Cunningham, G. O., & Michael, Y. L. (2004). Concepts guiding the study of the impact of the built environment on physical activity for older adults: A review of the literature. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18, 435–443.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eales, J., Keefe, J., & Keating, N. (2008). Age-friendly rural communities. In N. Keating (Ed.), Rural ageing: A good place to grow old? Bristol: Policy Press.
European Commission. (2009). EUR 24044- special issue on healthcare. Healthy ageing and the future of public healthcare systems. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Feldman, P. H., & Oberlink, M. R. (2003). The AdvantAge initiative. Developing community indicators to promote the health and wellbeing of older people. Fam Community Health, 26, 268–274.
Gilroy, R. (2008). Places that support human flourishing: Lessons from later life. Planning.
Harju, A. (2006). Finnish civil society. KVS Foundation. http://ec.europa.eu/citizenship/pdf/national_report_fi_en.pdf. Accesses 2 May 2018.
Hughes, A. (1997). Rurality and culture of womanhood: Domestic identities and moral order in village life. In P. Coke & J. Little (Eds.), Contested countryside cultures: Otherness, marginalization and rurality (pp. 25–30). New York: Routledge.
Janine, W., Annette, L., Nancy, G., Jeanne, R., & Ruth, A. (2012). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366.
Joseph, A. E., & Cloutier-Fisher, D. (2005). In G. A. Andrews & D. R. Philips (Eds.),. Ageing and place: Perspectives, policies, practice Ageing in rural communities: Vulnerable people in vulnerable places (pp. 133–146). Oxford: Routledge.
Judd, B., Olsberg, D., Quinn, J., Goenhart, L., & Demirbilek, O. (2010). Dwelling, land and neighbourhood use by older home owners (AHURI Final Report No. 144). Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
Karsio, O., & Anttonen, A. (2013). Marketisation of eldercare in Finland: Legal frames, outsourcing practices and the rapid growth of for-profit services. In G. Meagher & M. Szebehely (Eds.), Marketisation in Nordic eldercare: A research report in legislation, oversight, extent and consequences (pp. 85–125). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Keating, N., & Phillips, J. (2008). A critical human ecology perspective on rural ageing. In N. Keating (Ed.), Rural ageing: A good place to grow old? Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Keller, I. M., & Kalache, A. (1997). Promoting healthy aging in cities: The healthy cities project in Europe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 12, 287–298.
Keyes, L., Phillips, D. R., Sterling, E., Manegdeg, T., Kelly, M., Trimble, G., & Mayerik, C. (2014). Transforming the way we live together: A model to move communities from policy to implementation. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26, 117–130.
Kumar, R. (1996). Research methodology: A step by step guide for beginners. London: Sage.
Kutsar, D., & Kuronen, M. (2015). Local welfare policy making in European cities. Cham: Springer.
Kyngäs, H. & Vanhanen, L. (1999). Sisällönanalyysi. Hoitotiede, 11(1), s.3–12.
Lai, M-M., Lein, S-Y., Lau, S-H. & Lai, M-L. (2016). Modeling age-friendly environment, active aging, and social connectedness in an emerging Asian economy. Journal of Aging Research, 2016, Article ID 2052380.
Lawton, M. P. (1977). The impact of the environment on aging and behavior. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 276–301). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In C. Eisdorfer & L. Nahemow (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 464–488). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.
Leis, M., & Gijsbers, G. (2011). Active and healthy Ageing-A long term view up to 2015. Brussels: European Foresight Platform.
Lui, C. W., Everingham, J. A., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M., & Bartlett, H. (2009). What makes a community age friendly: A review of the international literature. Australasian Journal on Aging, 28, 116–121.
Menec, V. H., Means, R., Keating, N., Parkhurst, G., & Eales, J. (2011). Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 30(3), 479–493.
Menec, V. H., Hutton, L., Newall, N., Nowicki, S., Spina, J., & Eselyuk, D. (2015). How ‘age-friendly’ are rural communities and what community characteristics are related to age-friendliness? The case of rural Manitoba, Canada. Ageing and Society, 35(1), 203–223.
Moberg, L., Blomqvist, P., & Winblad, U. (2016). User choice in Swedish eldercare - conditions for informed choice and enhanced service quality. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(3), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716645076.
Naskali, P., Seppänen, M. & Begum, S.(eds.) (2016). Ageing, Wellbeing and Climate Change in the Arctic: An interdisciplinary analysis, Routledge – Earthscan.
O’Hehir, Janet. (2014). Age-friendly cities and communities: A literature review. University of South Australia: the Centre for Work + Life. http://www.unisa.edu.au/Research/Centre-for-Work-Life. Accessed 24 Jan 2018.
OECD. (2014). Health at a glance: Europe 2014. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2017). Seminar on linking rural definitions and policies for coordinated rural development. Warsaw, 7 April 2017. https://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/Proceedings-linking-rural-definitions.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018.
Phillips, D. R., Siu, O.-L., Yeh, A. G. O., & Cheng, K. H. G. (2005). Ageing and the urban environment. In J. A. Gavin & D. R. Phillips (Eds.), Ageing and place: Perspectives, policy, practice (pp. 147–163). London: Routledge.
Phillipson, C. (2004). Urbanisation and ageing: Towards a new environmental gerontology. Ageing and Society, 24, 963–972.
Phillipson, C. (2007). The ‘elected’ and the ‘excluded’: Sociological perspectives on the experience of place and community in old age. Ageing and Society, 27, 321–342.
Plouffe, L. A., & Kalache, A. (2010). Towards global age-friendly cities: Determining urban features that promote active aging. Journal of Urban Health, 87(5), 733–739.
Plouffe, L. A., & Kalache, A. (2011). Making communities age friendly: State and municipal initiatives in Canada and other countries. Gaceta Sanitaria, 25(2), 131–137.
Plouffe, L. A., Kalache, A., & Voelcker, I. (2016). A critical review of the WHO age-friendly cities methodology and its implementation. In T. Moulaert & S. Garon (Eds.), Age-friendly cities and communities in international comparison, international perspectives on aging 14. Cham: Springer.
Puthenparambil, J. M., & Kröger, T. (2016). Using private social care services in Finland: Free or forced choices for older people? Journal of Social Service Research, 42(2), 167–179.
Rothwell, N., Bollman, R. D., Tremblay, J., & Marshall, J. (2002). Recent migration patterns in rural and small town Canada (Agriculture and Rural working paper series, (Working paper no 55)). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Scharf, T., Phillipson, C., & Smith, A. (2007). Aging in a difficult place: Assessing the impact of urban deprivation on older people. In H.-W. Wahl, C. Tesch-Romer, & A. Hoff (Eds.), New dynamics in old age: Individual, environmental and societal perspectives (pp. 153–173). New York: Baywood Publishing.
Scharlach, A. E., & Lehning, A. J. (2016). Creating aging-friendly communities. New York: Oxford University Press.
Seong, J. K. (2016). Family care-givers’: difficulties and patterns of elderly care policy in Finland and South Korea. Master’s thesis: University of Tampere, School of Social Sciences and Humanities.
Short, R. (2006). Boosting the immune system. Nursing Older People, 18, 18–21.
Sidorenko, A., & Walker, A. (2004). The Madrid international plan of action on ageing: From conception to implementation. Ageing and Society, 24, 147–165.
Sirviö, A. & Illikainen, K. (2015). Sustainable buildings for the high North. Energy performance of current building stock in Scandinavia and Russia. ePooki. Publications of the Oulu University of Applied Sciences research and development 17. http://urn.fi/urn:isbn:978-951-597-128-9. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
Smith, A. E. (2009). Ageing in urban neighbourhoods: Place attachment and social exclusion. Bristol: University of Bristol: The policy Press.
Sosiaali- ja Terveysministeriö. (2017). Laatusuositus hyvän ikääntymisen turvaamiseksi ja palvelujen parantamiseksi 2017–2019. Helsinki: Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö ja Kuntaliitto.
Statistics Finland. (2016). Population density by area. Statistics Finland.
Statistics Finland. (2017). http://www.citypopulation.de/php/finland-admin.php?adm2id=047. Accessed 29 Jan 2018.
Tuomi, J. & Sarajärvi, A. (2004). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi. Jyväskylä: Gummerus Kirjapaino Oy.
UN. (2003). International plan of action on ageing. www.un.org/esa/socdev/ageing/ageipaa.htm. Accessed 18 July 2017.
Wahl, H.-W., Scheidt, R., & Windley, P. G. (Eds.). (2003). Annual review of gerontology & geriatrics, Vol. 23, Ageing in context: Socio-physical environments. New York: Springer.
WHO. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Available online: http://www.Who.Int/ageing/projects/age_friendly_cities/en/. Accessed on 20 Jan 2017.
WHO. (2016). Age friendly environment. 2016. Available online: http://www.Who.Int/ageing/projects/age-friendly-environments/en/. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.
Acknowledgement
I acknowledge and thank the participants from Luppokoti and participants from Peltovuoma village who shared their experiences. I thank Satu Marja, the director of Luppokoti and Sirpa Helena Seppälä from Peltovuoma village for their cooperations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Begum, S. (2019). Exploring Age-Friendly Environments in Rural Settings: Case Study from Finnish Lapland. In: Naskali, P., Harbison, J., Begum, S. (eds) New Challenges to Ageing in the Rural North. International Perspectives on Aging, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20603-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20603-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20602-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20603-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)