Abstract
Change in the social nature of later life is exhibited through a wide range of institutions and across a wide range of settings. This change is not confined to any particular group, nor to any particular place or setting. The increasingly networked societies of the twenty first century facilitate the movement of goods, information, services and people. Age and ageing are everywhere caught up in this mobility. The relatively solid structures that were established with modernity have been gradually eroded by processes and practices which de-standardise the life course and facilitate the individualisation of life. All of life is affected including later lives that are no longer marginal to the economy, culture or to political processes. Age begins to matter more. Part of this mattering concerns the effects of ageing on the economy – the provisions for funding pension income; the accumulation of ‘pensioner wealth’; and the rising purchasing power associated with later life. Another part is the changing demography and the impact of an ageing population on health, social and welfare provision and policy as the epidemiological transition extends its influence over the ever later stages of the life course.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Recent changes in the Netherlands have transferred some aspects of the purchasing of ‘institutional’ long term care from the responsibility of municipalities to central, insurance-based schemes covering health care, (Fernández and Nadash 2016: 37–38).
References
Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1994). The debate on the “Individualization theory” in today’s sociology in Germany. In B. Schäfers (Ed.), Soziologie, Uni-Taschenbücher (Vol. 1776, pp. 191–200). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London: Sage.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2009). Losing the traditional: Individualization and ‘precarious freedoms’. In A. Elliott & P. Du Gay (Eds.), Identity in question (pp. 13–36). London: Sage.
Beck, U., & Grande, E. (2007). Cosmopolitan Europe. Cambridge: Polity.
Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24.
Danilova, R. I., Golubeva, E. Y., & Emelyanova, A. S. (2012). Demographic aspects of the social safety of the elderly population in the Barents Euro-Arctic region. Advances in Gerontology, 1(3), 195–202.
Dawson, M. (2012). Reviewing the critique of individualization: The disembedded and embedded theses. Acta Sociologica, 55(4), 305–319.
Dowsley, M., & Southcott, C. (2017). An initial exploration of whether ‘female flight’ is a demographic problem in Eastern Canadian Arctic Inuit communities. Polar Geography, 40(1), 1–18.
Dutton, E. (2010). Latent social class terms and consumer culture in Finland: “Porvari,” “Amis,” and “Pummi”. Arctic Anthropology, 47(1), 94–108.
Elenius, L. (2008). Minority policy and postmodern ethnopolitical mobilisation at the North Calotte. In L. Heininenand & K. Laine (Eds.), The borderless North: Publications of the fourth Northern research forum (pp. 136–149). Oulu: Oulu University.
Emelyanova, A., & Rautio, A. (2016). Population diversification in demographics, health, and living environments: The Barents Region in review. Nordia Geographical Publications, 45(2), 3–18.
Exner-Pirot, H. (2018). The Arctic as a region of innovation. In B. O’Donnell, M. Gruenig, & A. Riedel (Eds.), Arctic summer college yearbook (pp. 21–31). Champaign: Springer.
Fernández, J. L., & Nadash, P. (2016). The long-term care financing problem. Long-Term Care Reforms in OECD Countries, (pp. 25-44). Bristol: Policy Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gilleard, C. & Higgs, P. (2005). Contexts of Ageing: Class, cohort and community. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2009). The third age: Field, habitus or identity. In I. R. Jones, P. Higgs, & D. Ekerdt (Eds.), Consumption & generational change (pp. 23–36). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2011). The third age as a cultural field. In D. C. Carr & K. S. Komp (Eds.), Gerontology in the era of the third age: Implications and next steps (pp. 33–49). New York: Springer.
Gori, C., Barbabella, F., Campbell, J., Ikegami, N., Johansson, L., Komisar, H., & Theobald, H. (2016). How different countries allocate long-term care resources to older users: Changes over time. In C. Gori, J.-L. Fernandez, & R. Wittenberg (Eds.), Long term care reforms in OECD countries (pp. 77–115). Bristol: Policy Press.
Hamilton, L. C., & Seyfrit, C. L. (1993). Female flight? Gender balance and outmigration by native Alaskan villagers. Arctic Medical Journal, 53(2), 189–193.
Heleniak, T. (2015). Arctic populations and migration. In J. N. Larsen & G. Fogdahl (Eds.), Arctic human development report: Regional processes and global linkages. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
Houtepen, R., & Ter Meulen, R. (2000). New types of solidarity in the European welfare state. Health Care Analysis, 8(4), 329–340.
Hyde, M., Higgs, P., Gilleard, C., Victor, C., Wiggins, D., & Jones, I. R. (2009). Ageing, cohorts and consumption: The British experience, 1968–2005. In I. R. Jones, P. Higgs, & D. Ekerdt (Eds.), Consumption & generational change (pp. 93–125). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Larsen, J. N., & Fondahl, G. (2015). Major findings and emerging trends in arctic human development. In J. N. Larsen & G. Fogdahl (Eds.), Arctic human development report: Regional processes and global linkages (pp. 478–902). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
Michelon, L. C. (1954). The new leisure class. American Journal of Sociology, 59(4), 371–378.
OECD. (2012). Pensions at a Glance 2012. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2017). Pensions at a Glance 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing. OECD.
Rasmussen, R. O. (2009). Gender and generation: Perspectives on ongoing social and environmental changes in the Arctic. Signs, 34(3), 524–532.
Schweitzer, P., Sköld, P., & Ulturgasheva, O. (2015). Cultures and identities. In J. N. Larsen & G. Fogdahl (Eds.), Arctic human development report: Regional processes and global linkages (pp. 105–150). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
Taipele, S., Wilska, T.-A., & Gilleard, C. (2017). Digital technologies and generational identity: ICT usage across the life course. London: Routledge Publisher.
Townsend, P. (1963). The family life of older people. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Vladimirova, V., & Habeck, J. O. (2018). Introduction: Feminist approaches and the study of gender in Arctic social sciences. Polar Geography, 41(3), 145–163.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gilleard, C., Higgs, P. (2019). The Individualisation of Ageing. In: Naskali, P., Harbison, J., Begum, S. (eds) New Challenges to Ageing in the Rural North. International Perspectives on Aging, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20603-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20603-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20602-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20603-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)