Abstract
Humans do not like dealing with problems. Though some may revel in times of chaos and doubt, the average person is plenty satisfied when their problems seem far away, and daily life remains ordinary and predictable. Problems are the embodiment of unpredictability, and such unpredictability threatens trouble that could generate an untold array of harmful consequences. Such consequences could be minor (i.e., taking an alternate route to work that happens to experience significant traffic on that day) to life-altering (i.e., critically inaccurate medical diagnoses). Thankfully, the human mind is tailored to be a problem-solving machine and uses various tricks and shortcuts to demystify uncertainty, identify patterns, and derive the optimal solution for the given problem at hand. This ‘brain-as-problem-solving-device’ concept is honed throughout one’s educational experience, where schools use ‘problems’ as teaching moments for students to derive a solution via a mixture of deductive and inductive reasoning and fact retention.
Right action is better than knowledge ; but in order to do what is right, we must know what is right.
—Charlemagne (724–814 A.D.)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Even if there is a need to explicit the probability of occurrence and reduce the uncertainty on the level of severity of the consequences.
References
Collier, Z. A., Trump, B. D., Wood, M. D., Chobanova, R., & Linkov, I. (2016). Leveraging stakeholder knowledge in the innovation decision making process. International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, 6(3), 163–181.
Florin, M. V., & Trump, B. D. (2018). Resilience in the context of systemic risks: Perspectives from IRGC’s guidelines for the governance of systemic risks. Domains of resilience for complex interconnected systems (p. 60).
IRGC. (2018). Guidelines for the governance of systemic risks. ETH Zurich.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of business, 59(4), 251–278.
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit (Vol. 273). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Linkov, I., & Trump, B. D. (2019). The science and practice of resilience. Springer International Publications.
Linkov, I., Rosoff, H., Valverde, L. J., Bates, M. E., Trump, B., Friedman, D., et al. (2012). Civilian response corps force review: The application of multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize skills required for future diplomatic missions. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 19(3–4), 155–168.
Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., & Fox-Lent, C. (2016). Resilience: Approaches to risk analysis and governance. An edited collection of authored pieces comparing, contrasting, and integrating risk and resilience with an emphasis on ways to measure resilience (p. 6).
Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., & Keisler, J. (2018). Risk and resilience must be independently managed. Nature, 555(7694), 30–30.
Malloy, T., Trump, B. D., & Linkov, I. (2016). Risk-based and prevention-based governance for emerging materials. Environmental Science & Technology.
Palma-Oliveira, J. M., & Trump, B. D. (2016). Modern resilience: Moving without movement. An edited collection of authored pieces comparing, contrasting, and integrating risk and resilience with an emphasis on ways to measure resilience (p. 173).
Palma-Oliveira, J. M., Trump, B. D., Wood, M. D., & Linkov, I. (2018). Community-driven hypothesis testing: A solution for the tragedy of the anticommons. Risk Analysis, 38(3), 620–634.
Trump, B. D., Poinsatte-Jones, K., Elran, M., Allen, C., Srdjevic, B., Merad, M., et al. (2017). Social resilience and critical infrastructure systems. In Resilience and risk (pp. 289–299). Dordrecht: Springer.
Trump, B. D., Cegan, J. C., Wells, E., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2018). A critical juncture for synthetic biology: Lessons from nanotechnology could inform public discourse and further development of synthetic biology. EMBO Reports, 19(7), e46153.
Ulanowicz, R. E., Goerner, S. J., Lietaer, B., & Gome, R. (2009). Quantifying sustainability: Resilience, efficiency and the return of information theory. Ecological Complexity, 6(1), 27–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Merad, M., Trump, B.D. (2020). About Expertise Problems: Decision Making Challenges in a Contentious Environment. In: Expertise Under Scrutiny. Risk, Systems and Decisions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20532-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20532-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20530-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20532-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)