Sharing the Road: Experienced Cyclist and Motorist Knowledge and Perceptions

  • Mary L. StillEmail author
  • Jeremiah D. Still
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 964)


Bicycling is an increasingly popular activity, but safely sharing the road with motorists presents challenges. This study explores two factors that may contribute to negative interactions on Virginia roadway: insufficient understanding of cycling-specific laws and differential hazard perception for cyclists and motorists. Surveyed motorists reported not knowing bicycle-related laws and demonstrated some misunderstanding that was concerning. The results unexpectedly indicate that motorists rate potential road hazards as riskier to cyclists than cyclists rate the same hazards. This suggests that motorists recognize the vulnerability of cyclists on the roadway. But, our findings also highlight that motorist do not actively monitor for the same hazards as cyclists. A lack of similar hazard awareness could be leading to the regular close calls cyclists are reporting. It may also be this lack of fundamental knowledge that contributes to motorist frustration during cyclist encounters.


Human factors Cyclist Transportation Hazards Safety Survey 



We thank Hampton Roads Cyclists, Swamp Stomp, Rustbucket Races, East Coast Bicycles, Rogue Velo Racing and Tradewinds Racing – Mermaid Winery for their assistance collecting data.


  1. 1.
    National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration’s National Center for Statistics and Analysis. Traffic Safety Facts 2016 Data: Bicyclists and Other Cyclists. (DOT Publication No. HS 812507). Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amoros, E., Martin, J.L., Laumon, B.: Under-reporting of road crash casualties in France. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38, 627–635 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winters, M., Branion-Calles, M.: Cycling safety: quantifying the under reporting of cycling incidents in Vancouver, British Columbia. J. Transp. Health Part A 7, 48–53 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haworth, N., Heesch, K.C., Schramm, A.: Drivers who don’t comply with a minimum passing distance rule when passing bicycle riders. J. Saf. Res. 67, 183–188 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aldred, R., Crosweller, S.: Investigating the rates and impacts of near misses and related incidents among UK cyclists. J. Transp. Health 2, 379–393 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Winters, M., Weddell, A., Teschke, K.: Is evidence in practice? Review of driver and cyclist education materials with respect to cycling safety evidence. Transp. Res. Rec. 2387, 34–45 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chaurand, N., Delhomme, P.: Cyclists and drivers in road interactions: a comparison of perceived crash risk. Accid. Anal. Prev. 50, 1176–1184 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ventsislavova, P., Gugliotta, A., Peña-Suarez, E., Garcia-Fernandez, P., Eisman, E., Crundall, D., Castro, C.: What happens when drivers face hazards on the road? Accid. Anal. Prev. 91, 43–54 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crundall, D.: Hazard prediction discriminates between novice and experienced drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 86, 47–58 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lehtonen, E., Havia, V., Kovanen, A., Leminen, M., Saure, E.: Evaluating bicyclists’ risk perception using video clips: comparison of frequent and infrequent city cyclists. Transp. Res. Part F 41, 195–203 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horswill, M., Kemala, C.N., Wetton, M., Scialfa, C., Pachana, N.A.: Improving older drivers’ hazard perception ability. Psychol. Aging 25, 464–469 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McKenna, F.P., Horswill, M.S., Alexander, J.L.: Does anticipation training affect drivers’ risk taking? J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 12, 1–10 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zeuwts, L., Cardon, G., Deconinck, F.J.A., Lenoir, M.: The efficacy of a brief hazard perception interventional program for child bicyclists to improve perceptive standards. Accid. Anal. Prev. 117, 449–456 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bonham, J., Johnson, M., Haworth, N.: Cycling related content in the driver licensing process. Transp. Res. Part A 117, 117–126 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations