Advertisement

Robots and Human Interaction in a Furniture Manufacturing Industry - Risk Assessment

  • Ana ColimEmail author
  • Susana Costa
  • André Cardoso
  • Pedro Arezes
  • Cláudia Silva
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 969)

Abstract

In the last decade, a significant increase of robotic solutions’ implementation has been verified across several industrial contexts, including the furniture manufacturing industries. The current study aimed at assessing the risks within different workstations with human-robots interfacing at a large furniture manufacturing company. With this purpose, a questionnaire to collect the workers’ perceptions about risks was developed. For each workstation, the William Fine method was applied, in order to estimate the risk levels and to define the priority of intervention measures. The preliminary results demonstrate that even though some preventive measures are already implemented, the workers are still exposed to different risks (e.g. falls in height). Therefore, several preventive measures should be considered. The current study was also important to the design and implementation of a risk assessment methodology with the workers’ active participation, and the results can be a reference for studies focused on risk assessment in other companies.

Keywords

Occupational safety Risk assessment Robotics solutions Manufacturing industry William fine Workers’ perceptions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2019.

References

  1. 1.
    Leso, V., Fontana, L., Iavicoli, I.: The occupational health and safety dimension of Industry 4.0. La Medicina Del Lavoro 109(5), 327–338 (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guimarães, L., Anzanello, M., Ribeiro, J., Saurin, T.: Participatory ergonomics intervention for improving human and production outcomes of a Brazilian furniture company. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 49, 97–107 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heydaryan, S., Bedolla, J.S., Belingardi, G.: Safety design and development of a human-robot collaboration assembly process in the automotive industry. Appl. Sci. 8, 344 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salim, R., Johansson, J.: Automation decisions in investment projects: a study in Swedish wood products industry. Procedia Manuf. 25, 255–262 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Indrawati, S., Prabaswari, A.D., Fitriyanto, M.A.: Risk control analysis of a furniture production activities using hazard identification and risk assessment method. Article no. 01102 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shangareev, R.: Role of employee motivation in an industrial occupational risk management system. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 194(2), 022033 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gorecky, D., Schmitt, M., Loskyll, M., Zühlke, D.: Human-machine interaction in the Industry 4.0 era, pp. 289–294. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fryman, J., Matthias, B.: Safety of industrial robots: from conventional to collaborative applications. In: Robotik, pp. 51–55 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alhonen, M., Launis, M., Kuorinka, T.: Ergonomic Workplace Analysis. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health. Ergonomics Section, Helsinki (1989)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fine, W.T.: Mathematical Evaluations for Controlling Hazards. Naval Ordnance Laboratory, White Oak (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Colim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Susana Costa
    • 1
  • André Cardoso
    • 2
  • Pedro Arezes
    • 1
  • Cláudia Silva
    • 1
  1. 1.ALGORITMI Centre, School of EngineeringUniversity of MinhoGuimaraesPortugal
  2. 2.Master in Human Engineering, School of EngineeringUniversity of MinhoGuimaraesPortugal

Personalised recommendations