Advertisement

The Sailport Project: A Trilateral Approach to the Improvement of Workers’ Safety and Health in Ports

  • Alessandro FilippeschiEmail author
  • Mauro Pellicci
  • Federico Vanni
  • Giulia Forte
  • Giulia Bassani
  • Lorenzo Landolfi
  • Diego De Merich
  • Giuseppe Campo
  • Carlo Alberto Avizzano
  • Massimo Bergamasco
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 969)

Abstract

This work presents a novel method for the improvement of safety and health in ports. Traditional and consolidated approaches to this goal are based on questionnaires and training activities that Local Health Authorities and the National Institute for Insurance against Accidents offer to the personnel of the companies that work in the port. We propose to complement this method by means of quantitative and pervasive measuring of risks related to safety and health. For the former, we propose a system that measures the collision risk in relevant areas of the port by means of cameras. For the latter, workers wear inertial measurement units and EMG electrodes to estimate the biomechanical overload. The results of these three actions are then merged and presented to the selected companies to make corrective actions, in order to reduce the safety and health risks for the port workers.

Keywords

Workers safety Work-related musculoskeletal disorders Biomechanical overload Machine learning Surveillance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the personnel of the Local Health Authorities involved in the project as well as the Port Authority of north Tyrrhenian Sea. Sailport is a project co-funded by INAIL, the Italian National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work, under the BRiC 2016 programme (ID24-2016).

References

  1. 1.
    Campo, G., Gulglielmi, A., Piz, C., Dei, M.: Approfondimento delle dinamiche, dei fattori causali e delle cause. In: Schede Informative del Sistema Informo (2017). ISBN 978-88-7484-523Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campo, G., Guglielmi, A., Marconi, M., Pianosi, G.: La ricostruzione delle cause e delle dinamiche infortunistiche negli ambienti di lavoro attraverso il modello Sbagliando s’impara. Prev. Oggi 2(1–2), 27–40 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Redmon, J., Farhadi, A.: Yolov3: An incremental improvement, arXiv (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kailath, T.: The divergence and Bhattacharyya distance measures in signal seflection. IEEE Trans. Commun. Technol. 15(1), 52–60 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 60(2), 91–110 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, L., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., Yuille, A.L.: DeepLab: semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected CRFs, CoRR, vol. abs/1606.00915 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00915
  7. 7.
    Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vignais, N., Miezal, M., Bleser, G., Mura, K., Gorecky, D., Marin, F.: Innovative system for real-time ergonomic feedback in industrial manufacturing. Appl. Ergon. 44(4), 566–574 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Peppoloni, L., Filippeschi, A., Ruffaldi, E., Avizzano, C.: A novel 7 degrees of freedom model for upper limb kinematic reconstruction based on wearable sensors. In: 11th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY), vol. 52, pp. 105–110 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ruffaldi, E., Peppoloni, L., Filippeschi, A.: Sensor fusion for complex articulated body tracking applied in rowing. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part P J. Sports Eng. Tehchnol. 229(2), 92–102 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peppoloni, L., Filippeschi, A., Ruffaldi, E., Avizzano, C.: A novel wearable system for the online assessment of risk for biomechanical load in repetitive efforts. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 52, 1–11 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hignett, S., McAtamney, L.: Rapid entire body assessment. In: Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods, pp. 97–108. CRC Press (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Steven Moore, J., Garg, A.: The strain index: a proposed method to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper extremity disorders. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 56(5), 443–458 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waters, T.R., Putz-Anderson, V., Garg, A., Fine, L.J.: Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 36(7), 749–776 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Filippeschi, A., Schmitz, N., Miezal, M., Bleser, G., Ruffaldi, E., Stricker, D.: Survey of motion tracking methods based on inertial sensors: a focus on upper limb human motion. Sensors 17(6), 1257 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Meredith, M., Maddock, S.: Motion capture file formats explained, vol. 211, pp. 241–244. Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Filippeschi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mauro Pellicci
    • 2
  • Federico Vanni
    • 1
  • Giulia Forte
    • 2
  • Giulia Bassani
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Landolfi
    • 1
  • Diego De Merich
    • 2
  • Giuseppe Campo
    • 2
  • Carlo Alberto Avizzano
    • 1
  • Massimo Bergamasco
    • 1
  1. 1.PERCRO LaboratoryTeCIP Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’AnnaPisaItaly
  2. 2.DIMEILA (Medicine, Epidemiology, Workplace and Environmental Hygiene Department)National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at WorkRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations