Advertisement

Implementing the REPAIRER Human Factors Safety Reporting System Through MRM(MxHF) to Meet SMS Compliance in Aviation Maintenance

  • Mark Miller
  • Bettina MrusekEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 969)

Abstract

Reiterating the importance of having a human factor related safety reporting system for aviation maintenance to reduce human error and utilizing it to gain SMS compliance, the REPAIRER method of identifying and reporting human factors hazards in aviation maintenance is reintroduced. How and why the REPAIRER method system is of such importance in the implementation of aviation maintenance safety programs can be linked to the success and evolution of maintenance resource management and human factors programs which have been effective in reducing human error in aviation maintenance. These programs are rooted in effective communication methods, as well as the identification of human factor elements. To illustrate this point, the successes of maintenance resource management are discussed. Additionally, the incredible strides that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has taken to propel a human factors-centered safety program in aviation maintenance are brought to light with the FAA’s latest transition of MRM (Maintenance Resource Management) to MxHF (Maintenance Human Factors). This newly appointed program, which replaced a decades old FAA MRM program, highlights the significant changes in MRM, notably the emphasis on human factors. Given the significant shift from MRM to MxHF, the authors explore the implementation of the REPAIRER aviation maintenance reporting system under the new guidelines and demonstrate how it could fulfill many of the desired outcomes of both programs, while still gaining SMS compliance.

Keywords

REPAIRER Reporting System SMS MRM MxHF 

References

  1. 1.
    Miller, M.D.: The repairer reporting system strategy for aviation maintenance: integrating human factors and risk management into aviation maintenance for SMS compliance. Presentation to FAA Aviation Maintenance Mega Conference Honolulu (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The MITRE Corporation: All Rights Reserved: The Safety Management System (Top View). Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited, 06-1512 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robertson, M.M.: Maintenance Resource Management, FAA Human Factors in Maintenance, FAA Office of Aviation Medicine, 3–4 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robertson, M.M.: Maintenance Resource Management, FAA Human Factors in Maintenance, FAA Office of Aviation Medicine, 4–5 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robertson, M.M.: Maintenance Resource Management, FAA Human Factors in Maintenance, FAA Office of Aviation Medicine, 5–6 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taylor, J.C.: The evolution and effectiveness of maintenance resource management (MRM). Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 26, 201–215 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patankar, M., Taylor, J.C.: Making a business case for the human factors programs in aviation maintenance. Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. Conf. 3, 767–770 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patankar, M., Taylor, J.C.: MRM training, evaluation, and safety management. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 18, 61–71 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iqbal, A., Manarvi, I., Siddiqui, M.H.: Maintenance resource management: a key process initiative to reduce human factors in aviation maintenance. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Snyderman, J.: Air National Guard Program Cuts Red Tape for Quick Solutions, af.mil (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robertson, M.M.: Maintenance Resource Management, FAA Human Factors in Maintenance, FAA Office of Aviation Medicine, 10 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robertson, M.M.: Maintenance Resource Management, FAA Human Factors in Maintenance, FAA Office of Aviation Medicine, 2 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Federal Aviation Administration: Maintenance Human Factors Training (MxHF), FAA Advisory Circular, 120-72A, 3 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Federal Aviation Administration: Maintenance Human Factors Training (MxHF), FAA Advisory Circular, 120-72A, 2 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Federal Aviation Administration: Maintenance Human Factors Training (MxHF), FAA Advisory Circular, 120-72A, 5 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Federal Aviation Administration: Maintenance Human Factors Training (MxHF), FAA Advisory Circular, 120-72A, 4-5 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Worldwide College of AeronauticsDaytona BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations