Parent Awareness of Smartphone Use and Its Health Impact

  • Regina Pope-FordEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 969)


Smartphones remain one of primary devices of choice for communication for many people. For children ages 10–12 this is especially true. These devices are used daily and for some multiple hours each day. As more applications are made available, it becomes increasingly difficult for children to minimize their screen time. This study aims to assess whether there are differences in what parents believe about smartphone use and what the child reported. Thirty-two children, ages 10–12, and one parent per child completed a questionnaire regarding smartphone use. Findings show parents are unaware of the total hours of use and the impact of smartphones on the health of children. Such information is important as screen time is not limited to home but is also increasingly expanding in the classroom. As well, the age of first time users continues to decrease.


Musculoskeletal disorders Age Mobile phone Children 



This study was partially funded by the Bradley University Heuser Award and the Office of Sponsored Programs Special Emphasis Award.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Global Smartphone Shipments Down 6% in Q3 2018 as the Leading Vendor and the Largest Market Face Challenges, According to IDC.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    The average age for a child getting their first smartphone is now 10.3 years.
  5. 5.
    Mobile Kids: The Parent, the Child, and the Smartphone.
  6. 6.
    Kids Under 9 Stare at Screens for More than 2 Hours Every Day, Survey Finds.
  7. 7.
    New Research: Screen Time is Literally Changing Children’s Brains.
  8. 8.
    The first long-term study on how screen time affects children’s brains suggests more than 2 hours a day could do damage.
  9. 9.
    Stavrinos, D., Byington, K.W., Schwebel, D.C.: Effect of cell phone distraction on pediatric pedestrian injury risk. Pediatrics 123(2), e179–e185 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duncan, D.K., Hoekstra, A.R., Wilcox, B.R.: Digital devices, distraction, and student performance: does in-class cell phone use reduce learning? Astron. Educ. Rev. 11(1) (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roberts, J.A., Pullig, C., Manolis, C.: I need my smartphone: a hierarchical model of personality and cell-phone addiction. Personality Individ. Differ. 79, 13–19 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koo, H.Y., Park, H.S.: Factors influencing cell phone addiction in adolescents. J. Korean Acad. Child Health Nurs. 16(1), 56–65 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jenaro, C., Flores, N., Gómez-Vela, M., González-Gil, F., Caballo, C.: Problematic internet and cell-phone use: psychological, behavioral, and health correlates. Addict. Res. Theory 15(3), 309–320 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rajagopal, B., Rajasekaran, L.: SAR assessment on three layered spherical human head model irradiated by mobile phone antenna. Hum.-Centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 4(10), 1–11 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wiart, J., Hadjem, A., Wong, M.F., Bloch, I.: Analysis of RF exposure in the head tissues of children and adults. Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 3681–3695 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhat, M.A., Kumar, V.: Calculation of SAR and measurement of temperature change of human head due to the mobile phone waves at frequencies 900 MHz and 1800 MHz 16, 54–63 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ackley, J.: Cell Phone Parental Control. Patent Number US 7,302,272 B2Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhou, T., Mohan, D., Zhang, B.: Handset based dynamic parental controls Patent Number US 7,869,792 B1Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park, J., Kim, J., Kim, J., Kim, K., Kim, N., Choi, I., Lee, S., Yim, J.: The effects of heavy smartphone use on the cervical angle, pain threshold of neck muscles and depression, vol. 91, pp. 12–17 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim, M.: Influence of neck pain on cervical movement in the Sagittal plane during smartphone use. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 27, 15–17 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pope-Ford, R.: Back flexion and extension: the effects of static posture on children using mobile devices In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 342–351. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and TechnologyBradley UniversityPeoriaUSA

Personalised recommendations