Advertisement

Occupational Psychosocial Toxicology in Health Workers of Radiological Units in Bogotá-Colombia

  • Olga PiñerosEmail author
  • Carlos MarínEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 969)

Abstract

The radiological units in Bogotá-Colombia present working conditions that put physical and mental health at risk.

Exposure to ionizing radiation in low doses and dysfunctional work environments generate environments of high physical and psychological toxicity.

The study carried out an analysis of work and health conditions for an approximation to the work reality. Determination of disrupters and psychosocial predictors for promotion and prevention programs. Study carried out in 20 radiological units with 229 employees and sample of 220. Signature of informed consent. Use of Instrument Battery for the Evaluation of Psychosocial Risk Factors. Levels of reliability in the questionnaires; intra-labor of 0.957 and stress 0.83.

Main psychosocial toxic risk and precursor “imaginary of safety at work” in 95%. Disruptors, low salary level and no risk training. Protective factor the relationship with your family.

Keywords

Management Toxicology Psychosociology Risk prevention Ionizing radiation 

References

  1. 1.
    Fassi, M., Bocquet, V., Majery, N., Lair, M.L., Couffignal, S., Mairiaux, P.: Work ability assessment in a worker population: comparison and determinants of Work Ability Index and Work Ability score, 1–10 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Padula, R.S., Silva Valente, L.S., Moraes, M.V., Chiavegato, L.D., Cabral, C.M.N.: Gender and age do not influence the ability to work 41 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cho, I.H., Park, K.S., Lim, C.J.: An empirical comparative study on biological age estimation algorithms with an application of Work Ability Index (WAI) 131, 69–78 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Safari, S., Akbari, J., Kasemi, M., Mououdi, M.A., Mahaki, B.: Personnel’s Health Surveillance at Work: effect of age, body mass index, and shift work on mental workload and work ability index (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martinez, M.C., Latorre, M.R.D., Fischer, F.M.: Capacidade para o trabalho: revisão de literatura. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva. 15, 1553–1561 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vasconcelos, S.P., Fischer, F.M., Olavo, A., Reis, A.: Fatores associados à capacidade para o trabalho e percepção de fadiga em trabalhadores de enfermagem da Amazônia Ocidental Factors associated with work ability 14, 688–697 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Piñeros, O., Marín, C.: Psychosocial toxicity in Colombian service companies. In: 9th International Conference Applied Human Factors Ergonomics, AHFE 2018, Orlando Fla. USA (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Piñeros, O., Marín, C.: Toxicología psicosocial. Disruptores y predictores. Una mirada a docentes Colombianos, ORP 2017, Psicosociología (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Airila, A., Hakanen, J., Punakallio, A.: Is work engagement related to work ability beyond working conditions and lifestyle factors (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soto, T., Martín, A.: Bajas Dosis de Radiación y Respuestas Adaptativas. Nucleos, 22–27 (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guerci, A.M., Córdoba, E.E.: Nuevo enfoque de los efectos biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes New approach to biological effects of ionising radiation. Elsevier Esp. 79, 224–225 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marín, C., Piñeros, O.: Organizational Management, Human Resources and Mobbing. Findings in Colombia. In: Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors. 9th International Conference Applied Human Factors Ergonomics, AHFE 2018, Orlando Fla, USA, vol. 791, pp. 110–115 (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valencia, C., Mora, O.: Acoso Psicológico en el Trabajo “Mobbing” en Empresas de Servicios Colombianas. Un factor de Riesgo que se debe Controlar. Rev. Colomb. Salud Ocupacional 6, 20–25 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ministerio de la Protección Social: Bateria de Instrumentos para la Valoración de Factores de Riesgo Psicosocial (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson J.V., H.E.: Job strain, workplace social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross sectional study of a random sample of the. Am. J. Public Health, 1336–1342 (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karasek, R., Theorell, T.: El modelo de demanda-control. Organ. Int. Trab. (1979)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Siegrist, J.: Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J. Occup. Health Psychol. (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vega, S.: NTP 604: Riesgo psicosocial: el modelo demanda-control-apoyo. INSHT, España (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Programa Administración en Salud OcupacionalCorporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - Sede Virtual y a Distancia-UVDBogotá D.C.Colombia

Personalised recommendations