Advertisement

Subject-Orientation as a Means for Business Information System Design – A Theoretical Analysis and Summary

  • Matthes ElstermannEmail author
  • Jivka Ovtcharova
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 353)

Abstract

(Business) Information systems become more and more complex due to an increase in the volume of data, but also due to more and more interconnected elements that all need to be orchestrated to perform as a uniform system. Correctly understanding and describing (business) processes, is one of the cornerstone foundations in the creation of almost all information systems. While the systems themselves have become more complex, and the means to program them have evolved over the last decades, the means to analyze and communicate about the processes they execute have stagnated on a simplistic level from the 1960s. Over the last 15 years, there has been work done in the development of concepts and tools on the topic of subject-orientation and subject-oriented (business) process modeling and management (S-BPM) that is different from earlier, classical process description approaches. This paper analyzes and argues about the shortcomings and discrepancies of those classical approaches and argues how subject-orientation may be an improvement when employed as a means in the design and development of information systems.

Keywords

Subject-orientation S-BPM Business process modeling Process analysis Information system design 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Object Management Group. UML Superstructure, v2.1.1. The Object Management Group, 07 February 2005. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/2007-02-05
  3. 3.
    Scheer, A.W.: ARIS - vom Geschäftsprozeß zum Anwendungssystem. Springer, Heidelberg (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56300-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Object Management Group. Business Process Model and Notation™ (BPMN™) - Version 2.0 (2011). http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/. (Zitat vom 20 Feb 2017)
  5. 5.
    Jakoby, W.: Projektmanagement für Ingenieure. Springer, Wiesbaden (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02608-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walter, U.: Scrip zur Vorlesung: Systems Engineering (2012). https://campus.tum.de/tumonline/LV_TX.wbDisplayTerminDoc?pTerminDocNr=9255. (Zitat vom 20 May 2016)
  7. 7.
    Herken, R.: The Universal Turing Machine: A Half-Century Survey. Springer, Wien (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parbel, M.: Programmiersprachen 2017: Vielfalt ist gefragt 13 Oct 2017 https://www.heise.de/developer/meldung/Programmiersprachen-2017-Vielfalt-ist-gefragt-3861018.html
  9. 9.
    Buchwald, H.: The power of ‘As-Is’ processes. In: Buchwald, H., Fleischmann, A., Seese, D., Stary, C. (eds.) S-BPM ONE 2009. CCIS, vol. 85, pp. 13–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15915-2_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meyer, B.: Object-oriented Software Construction, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fleischmann, A.: Distributed Systems: Software Design and Implementation. Springer, Heidelberg (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78612-9. ISBN: 978-3-642-78614-3CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fleischmann, A., et al.: Subjektorientiertes Prozessmanagement: Mitarbeiter einbinden, Motivation und Prozessakzeptanz steigern. Hanser, München (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elstermann, M., Krenn, F.: The semantic exchange standard for subject-oriented process models. In: S-BPM ONE 2018, Linz, Austria. ACM (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tölle, N., Graef, N.: Evaluation, Mapping und quantitative Reduktion von Workflow Patterns (Control-Flow) 15 May 2009. http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Thema3493
  15. 15.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al.: Workflow patterns. Distrib. Parallel Databases 14, 5–51 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Muehlen, Mz, Recker, J.: How much language is enough? theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 465–479. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69534-9_35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elstermann, M., Fleischmann, A.: Modeling complex process systems with subject-oriented means. In: S-BPM ONE 2019, Sevilla, Spain. ACM (2019)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jensen, K., Kristensen, L.M.: Coloured Petri Nets: Modelling and Validation of Concurrent Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/b95112CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Börger, E.: A Subject-Oriented Interpreter Model for S-BPM (2012). http://www.di.unipi.it/~boerger/Papers/Bpmn/SbpmBookAppendix.pdf
  20. 20.
    Fleischmann, A., et al.: An Overview to S-BPM Oriented Tool Suites. ACM, Darmstadt (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Stary, C., Obermeier, S., Börger, E.: Subject-Oriented Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32392-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dryer, M. S.: Chapter Order of Subject, Object and Verb. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (2017). http://wals.info/chapter/81. (Zitat vom 06 Feb 2017)
  23. 23.
    Schmidt, W., Fleischmann, A., Gilbert, O.: Subjektorientiertes Geschäftsprozessmanagement. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 46, 52–62 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Information Management in EngineeringKITKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations