Advertisement

Personalized Cloud Service Review Ranking Approach Based on Probabilistic Ontology

  • Emna Ben-AbdallahEmail author
  • Khouloud Boukadi
  • Mohamed Hammami
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 354)

Abstract

Online cloud service reviews have recently gained an increasing attention since they can have a significant impact on cloud user’ purchasing decision. A large number of cloud users consult these reviews before choosing cloud services. Therefore, identifying the most-helpful reviews is an important task for online retailers. The helpfulness of product/service reviews has been widely investigated in the marketing domain. However, these works do not pay attention to the following significant points: (1) the heterogeneity problem when extracting information from different Social Media Platforms (SMP), (2) the uncertainty judgment of review helpfulness and (3) the personalizing of review ranking by considering the context of the review. To tackle these three points we propose a new approach that relies on probabilistic ontology, called Context-aware Review Helpfulness Probabilistic Ontology (C-RHPO), to cope with the heterogeneity and uncertainty issues. In addition, the approach uses a personalized online review ranking method based on the end-user context. The herein reported experimental results proved the effectiveness and the performance of the approach.

Keywords

Online cloud service reviews Helpfulness Probabilistic ontology Context 

References

  1. 1.
    Amazon web services reviews & ratings — trustradius. trustradius.com/products/amazon-web-services/reviews, Accessed 10 Mar 2019
  2. 2.
    Digitalocean - avis. facebook.com/pg/DigitalOceanCloudHosting/reviews, Accessed 10 Mar 2019
  3. 3.
    Alkalbani, A.M., Ghamry, A.M., Hussain, F.K., Hussain, O.K.: Predicting the sentiment of SaaS online reviews using supervised machine learning techniques. In: 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1547–1553, July 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2016.7727382
  4. 4.
    Ben-Abdallah, E., Boukadi, K., Hammami, M.: SMI-based opinion analysis of cloud services from online reviews. In: Abraham, A., Muhuri, P.K., Muda, A.K., Gandhi, N. (eds.) ISDA 2017. AISC, vol. 736, pp. 683–692. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76348-4_66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ben-Abdallah, E., Boukadi, K., Hammami, M.: Spam detection approach for cloud service reviews based on probabilistic ontology. In: Panetto, H., Debruyne, C., Proper, H., Ardagna, C., Roman, D., Meersman, R. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, OTM Confederated International Conferences., LNCS, pp. 534–551. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02610-3_30
  6. 6.
    Carvalho, R.: Probabilistic ontology: representation and modeling methodology (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghose, A., Ipeirotis, P.G.: Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 23(10), 1498–1512 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2010.188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hong, H., Xu, D., Wang, G.A., Fan, W.: Understanding the determinants of online review helpfulness: a meta-analytic investigation. Decis. Support Syst. 102, 1–11 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.06.007. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923617301197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hu, Y.H., Chen, K.: Predicting hotel review helpfulness: the impact of review visibility, and interaction between hotel stars and review ratings. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36(6, Part A), 929–944 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.06.003. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401215301845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jayaratna, M.S.H., Bouguettaya, A., Dong, H., Qin, K., Erradi, A.: Subjective evaluation of market-driven cloud services. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), pp. 516–523, June 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2017.60
  11. 11.
    Krishnamoorthy, S.: Linguistic features for review helpfulness prediction. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(7), 3751–3759 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.044. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417414008239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ngo-Ye, T.L., Sinha, A.P.: The influence of reviewer engagement characteristics on online review helpfulness: a text regression model. Decis. Support Syst. 61, 47–58 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.01.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park, C.Y., Laskey, K., Costa, P., Matsumoto, S.: Multi-entity Bayesian networks learning in predictive situation awareness (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riloff, E., Wiebe, J.: Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2003, pp. 105–112. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2003).  https://doi.org/10.3115/1119355.1119369
  15. 15.
    Taghavi, M., Bentahar, J., Otrok, H., Wahab, O.A., Mourad, A.: On the effects of user ratings on the profitability of cloud services. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), pp. 1–8, June 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2017.8

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emna Ben-Abdallah
    • 1
    Email author
  • Khouloud Boukadi
    • 1
  • Mohamed Hammami
    • 1
  1. 1.Mir@cl LaboratorySfax UniversitySfaxTunisia

Personalised recommendations