Advertisement

Stress-Sensitive IT-Systems at Work: Insights from an Empirical Investigation

  • Michael Fellmann
  • Fabienne LambuschEmail author
  • Anne Waller
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 354)

Abstract

High workload, complex and knowledge-intense tasks as well as increased expectations in respect to flexibility and timeliness give rise to work intensification. This can lead to permanent stress causing serious health problems. Thus, it is a major concern to take measures against stress in order to maintain workers’ health and productivity. While information technology provides great potential to mitigate work-induced stress, preferences of workers regarding IT-based assistance are largely unknown. Against this research gap, we conducted a quantitative study on the acceptance and feasibility of implementation options for stress-sensitive systems. Our results are intended to inform future research in the design and development of such systems.

Keywords

Work stress Information systems Stress interventions Quantitative research User acceptance 

References

  1. 1.
    Walter, N., et al.: Die Zukunft der Arbeitswelt. Auf dem Weg ins Jahr 2030. Bericht der Kommission “Zukunft der Arbeitswelt” der Robert Bosch Stiftung (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siegrist, J.: Burn-out und Arbeitswelt. Psychotherapeut 58(2), 110–116 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Freude, G., Ullsperger, P.: Unterbrechungen bei der Arbeit und multitasking in der modernen Arbeitswelt - Konzepte, Auswirkungen und Implikationen für Arbeitsgestaltung und Forschung. Zbl Arbeitsmed 60(4), 120–128 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kielholz, A.: Online-Kommunikation: Die Psychologie der neuen Medien für die Berufspraxis. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78393-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eurofound: Sixth European Working Conditions Survey – Overview report (2017 update). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lohmer, M., Sprenger, B., von Wahlert, J.V.: Gesundes Führen: Life-Balance versus Burnout im Unternehmen. Schattauer, Stuttgart (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lazarus, R.S., Folkman, S.: Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scharnhorst, J.: Burnout. Präventionsstrategien und Handlungsoptionen für Unternehmen. Haufe Lexware (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Folkman, S., Lazarus, R.S.: If it changes it must be a process: study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48, 150–170 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Folkman, S., Lazarus, R.S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., Gruen, R.J.: Dynamics of a stressful encounter: cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50, 992–1003 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Selye, H.: The Stress of Life. McGraw-Hill, New York (1956)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sonnentag, S., Frese, M.: Stress in organizations. In: Handbook of Psychology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 560–592. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Benamati, J., Lederer, A.L.: Coping with rapid changes in IT. Commun. ACM 44, 83–88 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Al-Fudail, M., Mellar, H.: Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Comput. Educ. 51, 1103–1110 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., Purvis, R.: Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MIS Q. Manage. Inf. Syst. 35, 831–858 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maier, C., Laumer, S., Weinert, C., Weitzel, T.: The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services: a study of Facebook use. Inf. Syst. J. 25, 275–308 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fischer, T., Riedl, R.: The status quo of neurophysiology in organizational technostress research: a review of studies published from 1978 to 2015. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A.B. (eds.) Information Systems and Neuroscience, vol. 10, pp. 9–17. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18702-0_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Adam, M.T.P., Gimpel, H., Maedche, A., Riedl, R.: Design blueprint for stress-sensitive adaptive enterprise systems. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 59(4), 277–291 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koldijk, S.J.: Context-Aware Support for Stress Self-Management: From Theory to Practice (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harjumaa, M., Halttu, K., Koistinen, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: User experience of mobile coaching for stress-management to tackle prevalent health complaints. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Iivari, N., Kuutti, K., Öörni, A., Rajanen, M. (eds.) SCIS 2015. LNBIP, vol. 223, pp. 152–164. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21783-3_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Atz, U.: Evaluating experience sampling of stress in a single-subject research design. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 17(4), 639–652 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fellmann, M., Lambusch, F., Waller, A., Pieper, L., Hellweg, T.: Auf dem Weg zum stresssensitiven Prozessmanagement. In: Eibl, M., Gaedke, M. (eds.) INFORMATIK 2017, 863-869. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dimoka, A., et al.: On the use of Neurophysiological tools in IS research: developing a research agenda for NeuroIS. Manage. Inform. Syst. Q. 36(3), 679–702 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gimpel, H., Regal, C., Schmidt, M.: myStress: unobtrusive smartphone-based stress detection. In: ECIS 2015 Research-in-Progress Papers (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., Mermelstein, R.: A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 24(4), 385 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bortz, J., Döring, N.: Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. 4. überarb. Aufl. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Göthlich, S.E.: Zum Umgang mit fehlenden Daten in großzahligen empirischen Erhebungen. In: Methodik der empirischen Forschung. 3. Auflage, pp. 119–135. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Porst, R.: Fragebogen, 4th edn. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02118-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of RostockRostockGermany
  2. 2.University of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations