Abstract
As more and more people reach high age the need for care, especially at home, rises. Caring involves the coordination of a wide variety of actors. Modern information and communication technologies (ICT) may improve care coordination and thus relieve all actors involved in outpatient care.
This paper presents the results of a study (n = 108), that aimed to find out about the attitude of care actors towards digital care coordination tools in Germany. The survey contained questions regarding the care situation, expectations, technology commitment, barriers and need for assistance.
The data were primarily evaluated according to the subgroups informal caregivers and professional actors. The study showed a lack of target group oriented provision and support of groupware. A mere provision of the technology does not lead to the desired acceptance of the offer because none of the actor groups sees the initiating role of technology use on their side. Personal instruction and support are in demand in both user groups, regardless of technology commitment. For the rather less technology-savvy informal caregivers, this can be explained through their rather tense care situations and the mostly rather high age and the associated restrictions. Professionals demand to learn the technology in order to integrate it as effectively as possible into their daily care routine.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
https://youtu.be/mDkuJrocxL4 (informal actors), https://youtu.be/ZLSYalm9bT0 (professional actors); English subtitle available.
- 3.
Free online access to the questionnaire: https://zis.gesis.org/skala/Neyer.
- 4.
Participants were asked to tick the relevant reasons. 0 means “not relevant” and 1 “relevant”.
References
Neubert, L., König, H.H., Brettschneider, C.: Seeking the balance between caregiving in dementia, family and employment: study protocol for a mixed methods study in Northern Germany. BMJ Open 8, 1–9 (2018)
Bianchi, S.M.: A demographic perspective on family change. J. Fam. Theory Rev. 6, 35–44 (2014)
Vannieuwenborg, F., Van der Auwermeulen, T., Van Ooteghem, J., Jacobs, A., Verbrugge, S., Colle, D.: Evaluating the economic impact of smart care platforms: qualitative and quantitative results of a case study. JMIR Med. Informatics 4, e33 (2016)
Piau, A., Campo, E., Rumeau, P., Vellas, B., Nourhashemi, F.: Aging society and gerontechnology: a solution for an independent living? J. Nutr. Heal. Aging 18, 97–112 (2014)
Peek, S.T.M., Wouters, E.J.M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K.G., Boeije, H.R., Vrijhoef, H.J.M.: Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 83, 235–248 (2014)
Jacobs, M., Van Tilburg, T., Groenewegen, P., Broese Van Groenou, M.: Linkages between informal and formal care-givers in home-care networks of frail older adults. Ageing Soc. 36, 1604–1624 (2016)
Bäuerle, D., Scherzer, U.: Zukunft Quartier – Lebensräume zum Älterwerden. Themenheft 1: Hilfe-Mix – Ältere Menschen in Balance zwischen Selbsthilfe und (professioneller) Unterstützung, Netzwerk Soziales Neu Gestalten (SONG) (2009). http://www.netzwerk-song.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Themenheft1.pdf
Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Design of a virtual community infrastructure for elderly care. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M. (ed.) PRO-VE 2002. ITIFIP, vol. 85, pp. 439–450. Springer, Boston, MA (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35585-6_47
Bratteteig, T., Wagner, I.: Moving healthcare to the home: the work to make homecare work. In: Bertelsen, O., Ciolfi, L., Grasso, M., Papadopoulos, G. (eds.) ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 21–25 September 2013, Paphos, Cyprus, pp. 143–162. Springer, London (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5346-7_8
Bosch, L.B.J., Kanis, M.: Design opportunities for supporting informal caregivers. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA 2016, pp. 2790–2797. ACM Press, New York (2016)
Renyi, M., Teuteberg, F., Kunze, C.: ICT-based support for the collaboration of formal and informal caregivers – a user-centered design study. In: Abramowicz, W., Paschke, A. (eds.) BIS 2018. LNBIP, vol. 320, pp. 400–411. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93931-5_29
Bossen, C., Christensen, L.R., Grönvall, E., Vestergaard, L.S.: CareCoor: augmenting the coordination of cooperative home care work. Int. J. Med. Inform. 82, e189–e199 (2013)
Span, M., et al.: An interactive web tool for facilitating shared decision-making in dementia-care networks: a field study. Front. Aging Neurosci. 7, 1–12 (2015)
Breskovic, I., de Carvalho, A.F.P., Schinkinger, S., Tellioglu, H.: Social awareness support for meeting informal carers’ needs: early development in TOPIC. In: Bertelsen, O.W., Ciolfi, L., Grasso., M.A., Papadopoulos, G.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the ECSCW 2013, Paphos, vol. 2, pp. 3–8 (2013)
Boessen, A.B.C.G., Verwey, R., Duymelinck, S., van Rossum, E.: An online platform to support the network of caregivers of people with dementia. J. Aging Res. (2017)
Buboltz-Lutz, E., Kricheldorff, C.: Freiwilliges Engagement im Pflegemix - Neue Impulse. Lambertus-Verlag, Freiburg (2006)
Görres, S., Seibert, K., Stiefler, S.: Perspektiven zum pflegerischen Versorgungsmix. In: Pflege-Report 2016, pp. 3–14. Schattauer GmbH, Stuttgart (2016)
Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C.: A groupware design framework for loosely coupled workgroups. In: Gellersen, H., Schmidt, K., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Mackay, W. (eds.) ECSCW 2005, pp. 65–82. Springer, Dordrecht (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4023-7_4
Schmidt, K., Bannon, L.: Taking CSCW seriously. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 1, 7–40 (1992)
Tang, C., Carpendale, S.: An observational study on information flow during nurses’ shift change. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2007, p. 219. ACM Press, New York (2007)
Zhou, X., Ackerman, M., Zheng, K.: Doctors and psychosocial information: records and reuse in inpatient care. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2010, pp. 1767–1776 (2010)
Petrakou, A.: Integrated care in the daily work: coordination beyond organisational boundaries. Int. J. Integr. Care. 9, e87 (2009)
Abou Amsha, K., Lewkowicz, M.: Shifting patterns in home care work: supporting collaboration among self-employed care actors. In: De Angeli, A., Bannon, L., Marti, P., Bordin, S. (eds.) COOP 2016: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 23–27 May 2016, Trento, Italy, pp. 139–154. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33464-6_9
Robertson, T., Li, J., O’Hara, K., Hansen, S.: Collaboration within different settings: a study of co-located and distributed multidisciplinary medical team meetings. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 19, 483–513 (2010)
Mynatt, E.D., Rowan, J., Craighill, S., Jacobs, A.: Digital family portraits: supporting peace of mind for extended family members. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2001, pp. 333–340. ACM Press, New York (2001)
Rowan, J., Mynatt, E.D.: Digital family portrait field trial: support for aging in place. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2005, p. 521. ACM Press, New York (2005)
Christensen, L.R., Grönvall, E.: Challenges and opportunities for collaborative technologies for home care work. In: Bødker, S., Bouvin, N.O., Wulf, V., Ciolfi, L., Lutters, W. (eds.) ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24–28 September 2011, Aarhus Denmark, pp. 61–80. Springer, London (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_4
Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C.: Supporting collaboration in multidisciplinary home care teams. In: Proceedings of the AMIA 2002, pp. 617–621 (2002)
Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S.: Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: Modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 10(4), 281–311 (2003)
Heart, T., Kalderon, E.: Older adults: are they ready to adopt health-related ICT? Int. J. Med. Inform. 82, e209–e231 (2013)
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York (2003)
Grol, R., Wensing, M.: What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med. J. Aust. 180, S57–S60 (2004)
Bleses, P., et al.: Zwischenbericht des Verbundprojekts KoLeGe. Verbundprojekt KoLeGe, Bremen (2017)
Greenhalgh, T., et al.: Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J. Med. Internet Res. 19, e367 (2017)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)
Khatun, F., Palas, J.U., Ray, P.K.: Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model to analyze cloud-based mHealth service for primary care. Digit. Med. 3, 69–75 (2017)
Hoque, R., Sorwar, G.: Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: an extension of the UTAUT model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 101, 75–84 (2017)
Cimperman, M., Makovec Brenčič, M., Trkman, P.: Analyzing older users’ home telehealth services acceptance behavior-applying an Extended UTAUT model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 90, 22–31 (2016)
Grönvall, E., Lundberg, S.: On challenges designing the home as a place for care. In: Holzinger, A., Ziefle, M., Röcker, C. (eds.) Pervasive Health. HIS, pp. 19–45. Springer, London (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6413-5_2
Schorch, M., Wan, L., Randall, D.W., Wulf, V.: Designing for those who are overlooked - insider perspectives on care practices and cooperative work of elderly informal caregivers. In: Proceedings of the CSCW 2016, pp. 785–797. ACM Press, New York (2016)
Eschler, J., et al.: Shared calendars for home health management. In: Proceedings of the CSCW 2015, pp. 1277–1288 (2015)
Bødker, S., Grönvall, E.: Calendars: time coordination and overview in families and beyond. In: Bertelsen, O., Ciolfi, L., Grasso, M., Papadopoulos, G. (eds.) ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 21–25 September 2013, Paphos, Cyprus, pp. 63–81. Springer, London (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5346-7_4
Dwivedi, Y.K., Shareef, M., Simintiras, A., Lal, B., Weerakkody, V.J.: A generalised adoption model for services: a cross-country comparison of mobile health (m-health). Gov. Inf. Q. 33, 174–187 (2018)
Neyer, F.J., Felber, J., Gebhardt, C.: Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala zur Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft. Diagnostica 58, 87–99 (2012)
Porst, R.: Pretests zur Evaluation des Fragebogen(entwurf)s. In: Fragebogen. SS, pp. 189–205. Springer, Wiesbaden (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02118-4_15
Klein, B.: Neue Technologien und soziale Innovationen im Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen. In: Soziale Innovation, pp. 271–296. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2010)
Eggert, S., Sulmann, D., Teubner, D.C.: ZQP-Befragung: Einstellung der Bevölkerung zu digitaler Unterstützung in der Pflege. ZQP Stiftung, Berlin (2018)
Ponnala, S., Weiler, D.T., Gilmore-Bykovskiy, A., Block, L., Kind, A.J., Werner, N.E.: Towards an understanding of informal care networks of persons with dementia: perceptions of primary caregivers. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 62(1), 561–562 (2018)
Peek, S.T.M., et al.: Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology 62, 226–237 (2016)
Fachinger, U.: Technikeinsatz bei Pflegebedürftigkeit. In: Jacobs, K., Kuhlmey, A., Greß, S., Schwinger, A., Klauber, J. (eds.) Pflege-Report 2017: Schwerpunkt: Die Versorgung der Pflegebedürftigen, pp. 83–88. Schattauer, Stuttgart (2017)
van Wieringen, M., Broese van Groenou, M.I., Groenewegen, P.: Impact of home care management on the involvement of informal caregivers by formal caregivers. Home Health Care Serv. Q. 34, 67–84 (2015)
Jeon, E., Park, H.: Factors affecting acceptance of smartphone application for management of obesity. Heal. Informatics Res. 21, 74–82 (2015)
Silow-Caroll, S., Smith, B.: Clinical management apps: creating partnerships between providers and patients. Commonw. Fund. 30, 1–10 (2013)
Wetzstein, M., Rommel, A., Lange, C.: Pflegende Angehörige – Deutschlands größter Pflegedienst. GBE kompakt. 6 (2015)
Statistisches Bundesamt: Pflegestatistik 2015 - Pflege im Rahmen der Pflegeversicherung Deutschlandergebnisse., Wiesbaden (2017)
Willard, S., Cremers, G., Man, Y.P., Van Rossum, E., Spreeuwenberg, M., De Witte, L.: Development and testing of an online community care platform for frail older adults in the Netherlands: a user-centred design. BMC Geriatr. 18, 1–9 (2018)
Acknowledgments
We want to thank our participants for contributing their time. This work was supported by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Integration Baden-Württemberg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Renyi, M., Rosner, M., Teuteberg, F., Kunze, C. (2019). Collaboration in Mixed Homecare – A Study of Care Actors’ Acceptance Towards Supportive Groupware. In: Abramowicz, W., Corchuelo, R. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 354. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20482-2_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20482-2_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20481-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20482-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)