Skip to main content

Development of a Standardized Ergonomic Assessment Methodology for Exoskeletons Using Both Subjective and Objective Measurement Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems (AHFE 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 962))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Awkward postures, high loads, and highly repetitive tasks are risk factors for developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders, which are the main reason for sick days in manufacturing. Overhead work, specifically, is a high-risk factor for developing musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder, which account for the longest sick leaves among all musculoskeletal disorders.

Assistive devices, such as exoskeletons, seek to reduce the stresses associated with overhead work, and have even been suggested as a preventative measure for musculoskeletal disorders.

To investigate the physiological consequences of passive upper limb exoskeletons a standardized holistic assessment methodology, including one subjective (Borg CR-10) and three objective measurement techniques (EMG, ergo spirometry combined with heart rate and NIRS). A set of static, dynamic, and simulated assembly tasks in combination with a suitable test rig is developed and preliminary study results are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Statistical Office of the European Communities.: Health and Safety at Work in Europe (1999–2007). A Statistical Portrait. Eurostat. Statistical Books. Office for Official Publications of the European Union, Luxembourg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Society of Biomechanics (Hrsg).: EMG assessment of a should support Exoskeleton during on-site job tasks (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bargende, M., Reuss, H-C., Wiedemann, J. (Hrsg).: 17 Internationales Stuttgarter Symposium. Automobil- und Motorentechnik. Proceedings. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spada, S., Ghibaudo, L., Gilotta, S., Gastaldi, L., Cavatorta, M.P.: Investigation into the applicability of a passive upper-limb exoskeleton in automotive industry. Procedia Manufacturing 11, 1255–1262 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Spada, S., Ghibaudo, L., Gilotta, S., Gastaldi, L., Cavatorta, M.P.: Analysis of exoskeleton introduction in industrial reality: main issues and EAWS risk assessment. In: Goonetilleke, R.S., Karwowski, W., 0009835 (Hrsg) Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors. Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors, July 17–21, 2017, The Westin Bonaventure Hotel, Los Angeles, California, USA. Springer International Publishing, Cham, s.l (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Looze, M.P., Bosch, T., Krause, F., Stadler, K.S., O’Sullivan, L.W.: Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics 59(5), 671–681 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Theurel, J., Desbrosses, K., Roux, T., Savescu, A.: Physiological consequences of using an upper limb exoskeleton during manual handling tasks. Appl. Ergon. 67, 211–217 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weston, E.B., Alizadeh, M., Knapik, G.G., Wang, X., Marras, W.S.: Biomechanical evaluation of exoskeleton use on loading of the lumbar spine. Appl. Ergon. 68, 101–108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huysamen, K., Bosch, T., de Looze, M., Stadler, K.S., Graf, E., O’Sullivan, L.W.: Evaluation of a passive exoskeleton for static upper limb activities. Appl. Ergon. 70, 148–155 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, S., Nussbaum, M.A., Mokhlespour Esfahani, M.I., Alemi, M.M., Alabdulkarim, S., Rashedi, E.: Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation. Part I – “Expected” effects on discomfort, shoulder muscle activity, and work task performance. Appl. Ergon. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, S., Nussbaum, M.A., Mokhlespour Esfahani, M.I., Alemi, M.M., Jia, B., Rashedi, E.: Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation. Part II – “Unexpected” effects on shoulder motion, balance, and spine loading. Appl. Ergon. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu, W., Fong, J., Crocher, V., Lee, P.V.S., Oetomo, D., Tan, Y., Ackland, D.C.: Modulation of shoulder muscle and joint function using a powered upper-limb exoskeleton. J. Biomech. 72, 7–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.02.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muramatsu, Y., Kobayashi, H., Sato, Y., Jiaou, H., Hashimoto, T., Kobayashi, H.: Quantitative performance analysis of exoskeleton augmenting devices - muscle suit - for manual worker. Int. J. Autom. Technol. 5(4), 559–567 (2011). https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2011.p0559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazzaroni, M., Toxiri, S., Ortiz, J., De Momi, E., Caldwell, D.G.: Towards standards for the evaluation of active back-support exoskeletons to assist lifting task

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dahmen, C., Hefferle, M.: Application of Ergonomic Assessment Methods on an Exoskeleton Centered Workplace Proceedings of the The XXXth Annual Occupational Ergonomics and Safety Conference

    Google Scholar 

  16. Borg, G.: Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Corlett, E.N., Bishop, R.P.: A technique for assessing postural discomfort. Ergonomics 19(2), 175–182 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137608931530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Muramatsu, Y., Kobayashi, H.: Assessment of local muscle fatigue by NIRS - development and evaluation of muscle suit -. Robomech J. 1(1), 46 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40648-014-0019-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferrari, M., Mottola, L., Quaresima, V.: Principles, techniques, and limitations of near infrared spectroscopy. Can. J. Appl. Physiol. 29(4), 463–487 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Koller, J.R., Gates, D.H., Ferris, D.P., David Remy, C.: ‘Body-in-the-loop’ optimization of assistive robotic devices: a validation study. In: Hsu, D., Amato, N., Berman, S., Jacobs, S. (Hrsg) Robotics: Science and Systems XII. Robotics Science and Systems Foundation, Berlin? (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Hefferle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hefferle, M., Lechner, M., Kluth, K., Christian, M. (2020). Development of a Standardized Ergonomic Assessment Methodology for Exoskeletons Using Both Subjective and Objective Measurement Techniques. In: Chen, J. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 962. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20467-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics