An Interactive Device for Reducing Risk of Infusion Therapy and Blood Transfusions

  • Nicholas CaporussoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 957)


Administration of high-risk medications and transfusion of blood components are routinary medical procedures that can be potentially harmful to patients due to a set of multifaceted factors, such as, conservation of the medical product, poor asset tracking, and human errors. Although they represent a very small percentage of adverse events, errors and complications associated with transfusion and infusion therapy can cause major morbidity and death.

In the recent years, several reporting initiatives and intervention measures led to the adoption of dedicated processes and tools designed for preventing errors, reducing the associated potential damage, and increasing patient safety. Nevertheless, statistics and reports of incidents demonstrate that infusion and transfusion therapies still demand more effective solutions. In this paper, we introduce an innovative interactive system that aims at reducing risk by taking into consideration human factors that are involved at bedside, such as, fatigue, stress, attention, and cognitive load. Specifically, the proposed solution consists in an attachment that locks a medical container in the prescription phase and prevents access to its content and administration unless all the safety conditions as met. In addition to enforcing safety with a physical barrier, it operates as a visual management tool throughout the process and, specifically, at bedside, where most incidents occur.


Risk prevention Hemovigilance Pharmacovigilance Patient safety 


  1. 1.
    Burton, M.M., Hope, C., Murray, M.D., Hui, S., Overhage, J.M.: The cost of adverse drug events in ambulatory care. In: AMIA… Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, pp. 90–93 (October 2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maskens, C., Downie, H., Wendt, A., Lima, A., Merkley, L., Lin, Y., Callum, J.: Hospital-based transfusion error tracking from 2005 to 2010: identifying the key errors threatening patient transfusion safety. Transfusion 54(1), 66–73 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giuliano, K.K., Niemi, C.: The urgent need for innovation in IV infusion devices. Nursing 46(4), 66 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Phillips, J., Beam, S., Brinker, A., Holquist, C., Honig, P., Lee, L.Y., Pamer, C.: Retrospective analysis of mortalities associated with medication errors. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 58(19), 1835–1841 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pandey, S., Vyas, G.N.: Adverse effects of plasma transfusion. Transfusion 52, 65S–79S (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gilliss, B.M., Looney, M.R., Gropper, M.A.: Reducing noninfectious risks of blood transfusion. J. Am. Soc. Anesth. 115(3), 635–649 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lahue, B.J., Pyenson, B., Iwasaki, K., Blumen, H.E., Forray, S., Rothschild, J.M.: National burden of preventable adverse drug events associated with inpatient injectable medications: healthcare and medical professional liability costs. Am. Health & Drug Benefits 5(7), 1 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dhingra, N., Hafner, V.: Safety of blood transfusion at the international level. The role of WHO. Transfusion clinique et biologique: journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine 13(3), 200–202 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    US Food and Drug Administration, Fatalities Reported to FDA Following Blood Collection and Transfusion: Annual Summary for Fiscal Year (2016).
  10. 10.
    Murphy, M.F., Fraser, E., Miles, D., Noel, S., Staves, J., Cripps, B., Kay, J.: How do we monitor hospital transfusion practice using an end-to-end electronic transfusion management system? Transfusion 52(12), 2502–2512 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hussain, S., Moiz, B., Ausat, F.A., Khurshid, M.: Monitoring and reporting transfusion reactions as a quality indicator–a clinical audit. Transfus. Apheres. Sci. 52(1), 122–127 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khetan, D., Katharia, R., Pandey, H.C., Chaudhary, R., Harsvardhan, R., Pandey, H., Sonkar, A.: Assessment of bedside transfusion practices at a tertiary care center: a step closer to controlling the chaos. Asian J. Transfus. Sci. 12(1), 27 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ohsaka A.: Electronic pre-transfusion check at the bedside: experience in a university hospi-tal. Hematol. Transfus. Int. J. 4(3), 90–96 (2017).
  14. 14.
    Coustasse, A., Cunningham, B., Deslich, S., Wilson, E., Meadows, P.: Management of RFID Systems in Hospital Transfusion Services (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaplan, H., Battles, J.B., Van der Schaaf, T.W., Shea, C.E., Mercer, S.Q.: Identification and classification of the causes of events in transfusion medicine. Transfusion 38(11–12), 1071–1081 (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bolton-Maggs, P.H., Cohen, H.: Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) haemovigilance and progress is improving transfusion safety. Br. J. Haematol. 163(3), 303–314 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheema, A.S., Srivastava, S., Srivastava, P.K., Murthy, B.K.: A standard compliant blood bank management system with enforcing mechanism. In: Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS), 2015 International Conference, pp. 1–7. IEEE (December 2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Caporusso, N., Lasorsa, I., Rinaldi, O., la Pietra, L.: A pervasive solution for risk awareness in the context of fall prevention. In: 3rd International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), pp. 1–8. IEEE (April 2009).
  19. 19.
    Williamson, L.M.: Transfusion hazard reporting: powerful data, but do we know how best to use it? Transfusion 42(10), 1249–1252 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Caporusso, N., Lasorsa, I.: Modellazione cognitiva di Mode Confusion in task di Standard Operating Procedure collaborative life-criticalGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oldham, J., Sinclair, L., Hendry, C.: Right patient, right blood, right care: safe transfusion practice. Br. J. Nurs. 18(5), 312–320 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ohsaka, A., Kato, H., Kino, S., Kawabata, K., Kitazawa, J., Sugimoto, T., Takeshita, A., Baba, K., Hamaguchi, M., Fujii, Y., Horiuchi, K.: Recommendations for the elec-tronic pre-transfusion check at the bedside. Blood Transfus. 14(5), 419 (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Caporusso, N.: A device for measuring potentially hazardous forces on medical equipment for patient transport. In: 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), pp. 1–4. IEEE (March 2010).
  24. 24.
    Chaturvedi, R., Soon-Shiong, P., Brewer, E.A., Lee, J.H., Nant Holdings IP LLC: Sensor equipped medicinal container. U.S. Patent 9,918,906 (2018)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Long, G.R., EI du Pont de Nemours and Co.: Cross identification system and lock. U.S. Patent 4,415,802 (1983)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Caporusso, N., Biasi, L., Cinquepalmi, G., Trotta, G.F., Brunetti, A., Bevilacqua, V.: A wearable device supporting multiple touch-and gesture-based languages for the deaf-blind. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 32–41. Springer, Cham (July 2017). Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fort Hays State UniversityHaysUSA
  2. 2.INTACTBariItaly

Personalised recommendations