Abstract
Arguably, one of the most natural and potent ways to learn is through experience, or learning by doing—an approach that has been vehemently ingrained in the teaching and learning programs at Lagos Business School (LBS). The school has incorporated experiential learning procedures into its management education programs through real-life projects such as capstones, study tours, and project simulations. The prospective chapter will explore the process of integration and transfer, the progress made, challenges encountered, and how they have been managed so far.
I hear, and I forget. I see, and I remember. I do, and I understand.
Ancient Chinese Proverb
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bevan, D., & Kipka, C. (2012). Experiential learning and management education. Journal of Management Development, 31(3), 193–197.
Boyatzis, R. E. (2008). Competencies in the 21st century. The Journal of Management Development, 27(1), 5–12.
Davies, J. A. (2009). Methods of experiential education: Context, transferability and resources. Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal, 22(1), 21.
Dean, K. L., & Fornaciari, C. J. (2002). How to create and use experiential case-based exercises in a management classroom. Journal of Management Education, 26(5), 586–603.
Elmuti, D. (2004). Can management be taught? Management Decision, 42(3/4), 439–453.
Harton, H. C., Richardson, D. S., Barreras, R. E., Rockloff, M. J., & Latane, B. (2002). Focused interactive learning: A tool for active class discussion. Teaching of Psychology, 29(1), 10–15.
Jacoby, B. (2012). Should I encourage experiential learning during class? How? Magna Publication Inc.
Kachra, A., & Schnietz, K. (2008). The capstone strategy course: What might real integration look like? Journal of Management Education, 32(4), 476–508.
Kolb, A., & Lingham, T. (2002). Ohio Consortium of Artistic Learning: A baseline study for of the learning styles of visual arts. Preliminary Report. Experience-based Learning Systems, Inc.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(2), 193–212.
Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. A. (2008). Experiential learning theory: A dynamic, holistic approach to management learning, education and development. In Handbook of management learning, education and development. Los Angeles: SAGE.
McCarthy, B. (1981, 1987). The 4MAT system: Teaching to learning styles with right/left mode techniques. Barrington, IL: Exel, Inc.
Mintzberg, H. (1992). MBA: Is the traditional model doomed. Harvard Business Review, 70(6), 128–140.
Parks, D., & Lindstrom, G. (1995). Achieving higher levels of learning in the business policy and strategy course through integration of a business simulation. Journal of Management Education, 19(2), 219–227.
Poisson-de Haro, S., & Turgut, G. (2012). Expanded strategy simulations: Developing better managers. Journal of Management Development, 31(3), 209–220.
Rapert, M. I., Smith, S., Velliquette, A., & Garretson, J. A. (2004). The meaning of quality: Expectations of students in pursuit of an MBA. Journal of Education for Business, 80(1), 17–24.
Schon, D. (1983). Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Stuckey, R. T. & Ogilvy, J. P., (2007). Best practices for legal education: A vision and a road map. Clinical Legal Education Association.
Thomas, A. S. (1998). The business policy course: Multiple methods for multiple goals. Journal of Management Education, 22(4), 484–497.
Wagner, S. L., & Moffett, R. G., III. (2000). Assessment methodology, context, and empowerment: The ace model of skill development. Journal of Management Education, 24(4), 424–444.
Walter, G. A., & Marks, S. E. (1981). Experiential learning and change: Theory design and practice. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Wolfe, J. (1997). The effectiveness of business games in strategic management course work. Simulation & Gaming, 28(4), 360–376.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Real-Life Project Procedures
Typical Milestones
Step One: Organizational proposal and selection process | Step Two: Creation of a three- to five-page “case” document on the organization and the business challenge |
• Consider potential projects and obtain buy-in from the leadership team and board of directors to apply the capstone project | • Student teams be deployed the entity concern to draft a case with the company’s input |
• Complete the application and project proposal form and submit. | • The team is provided with adequate data to aid their case write-up |
• Capstone faculty is available for consultation while developing the project proposal. |  |
Skills and Competencies of the Capstones
Step Three: Meet the team day | Step Four: Information gathering sessions |
• Key organization leaders and board members attend a two-hour session for community organization day | • Project liaison works with students and professors, including providing additional data, facilitating interviews for students, answering follow-on questions, and so on. |
• The session is designed to enable the organization representatives to answer questions about their entity. | • Constant touch with the project professor. |
Step Five: Final presentation and deliverables | Â |
• The organization leadership teams receive students’ final presentation. |  |
• The student team deliverables are sent to the organization for their review and their follow-up with the students |  |
Appendix 2: Skills and Competencies Embed in the BSG and the Other Capstones
Leadership Skills
Assessment of the individual’s leadership and independent thinking skills.
Collaboration and Teamwork
Assessment of the individual’s collaborative skills, teamwork, and ability to work well with others.
Financial Analysis
Assessment of the individual’s skills in analyzing financial ratios and financial statements.
Financial Management
Assessment of the group’s ability to apply financial management principles. Based on the company’s ROE, credit rating, and stock price performances.
Operations Management
Assessment of the group’s ability to manage production operations and control production costs.
Marketing Management
Assessment of the group’s ability to effectively market the company’s product and control marketing costs. Based on the company’s market image and marketing costs per unit sold.
Human Resources Management
Assessment of the group’s proficiency in workforce management and controlling labor costs. Based on workforce compensation, workforce productivity, and labor costs per unit sold.
Strategic Analysis and Planning
Assessment of the group’s strategic planning and strategic thinking skills. Based on scores achieved on the three-year strategic plan exercise.
Corporate Social Responsibility
Assessment of group’s awareness of and commitment to operating the company in a socially responsible manner and being a “model corporate citizen”.
Appendix 3: Evaluation and Learning Goals
Pilot test of learning goals Selected in 2015 | Courses (where it is applied in LBS) |
---|---|
MBA program goal one: Analytical and problem-solving skills Students should be able to use appropriately analytical techniques and information to identify business problems, seek multiple perspectives, formulate, and implement possible solutions | Â |
• Financial analysis from the Glo-bus BSG • Written assignment in the Glo-bus simulation using standard rubrics | BSG Strategy II (real-life projects and study tours) |
Goal two: Ethical and social responsibility Students should understand ethical and social issues and how they impact on businesses | Â |
• Learning assurance report • Written assignment | BSG Strategy II |
Goal three: Global perspectives: Students should understand the local and global business trends and be able to apply international best practices. | Â |
• Case examination analysis • Written assignment | BSG Strategy II |
Goal four: Leadership: Students will demonstrate the ability to lead in a team in a group setting and exhibit interpersonal abilities. | Â |
• Peer review results | BSG |
Goal five: Communication skills-oral Students will be able to prepare and deliver effective presentations with the aid of appropriate technology. | Â |
• Various individual presentations during each BSG period • Final round presentation | BSG |
Goal six: Communication skill-written Students should be able to produce professional reports • Final case written examination using standard rubrics. |  |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ogbechie, C., Akanji, H. (2019). Experiential Learning in Executive Education: The Lagos Business School (LBS) Experience. In: Gonzalez-Perez, M.A., Lynden, K., Taras, V. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Learning and Teaching International Business and Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20415-0_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20415-0_44
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20414-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20415-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)