Advertisement

A Fast Fiber k-Nearest-Neighbor Algorithm with Application to Group-Wise White Matter Topography Analysis

  • Junyan WangEmail author
  • Yonggang Shi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11492)

Abstract

Finding the fiber k-nearest-neighbors (k-NN) is often essential to brain white matter analysis yet it is computationally prohibitive, and no efficient approximation to it is known to the best of our knowledge. We observe a strong relationship between the point-wise distances and tract-wise distances. Based on this observation, we propose a fast algorithm for approximating the k-NN distances of large fiber bundles with point-wise K-NN algorithm, and we call it the fast fiber k-NN algorithm. Furthermore, we apply our fast fiber k-NN algorithm to white matter topography analysis, which is an emerging problem in brain connectomics reasearch. For the latter task, we first propose to quantify the white matter topography by metric embedding, which gives rise to the first anatomically meaningful fiber-wise measure of white matter topography to the best of our knowledge. In addition, we extend the individual white matter topography analysis to group-wise analysis using the k-NN fiber distances computed with our fast algorithm. In our experiments, (a) we find that our fast fiber k-NN algorithm reasonably approximates the ground-truth distance at 1–2 percent of its computational cost, (b) we also verify the anatomical validity of our proposed topographic measure, and (c) we find that our fast fiber k-NN algorithm performs identically well compared with the exhaustive fiber distance computation, for the group-wise white matter topography analysis for 792 subjects from the Human Connectome Project.

References

  1. 1.
    Abraham, I., Bartal, Y., Neiman, O.: Advances in metric embedding theory. Adv. Math. 228(6), 3026–3126 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bentley, J.L.: Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching. Commun. ACM 18(9), 509–517 (1975)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borg, I., Groenen, P.J.: Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28981-XCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cabeen, R.P., Laidlaw, D.H., Toga, A.W.: Quantitative imaging toolkit: software for interactive 3D visualization, processing, and analysis of neuroimaging datasets. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gibson, W.: On the least-squares orthogonalization of an oblique transformation. Psychometrika 27(2), 193–195 (1962)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glasser, M.F., et al.: The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the human connectome project. Neuroimage 80, 105–124 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jbabdi, S., Sotiropoulos, S.N., Behrens, T.E.: The topographic connectome. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 23(2), 207–215 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jianu, R., Demiralp, C., Laidlaw, D.: Exploring 3D DTI fiber tracts with linked 2D representations. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 15(6), 1449–1456 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jin, Y., et al.: Automatic clustering of white matter fibers in brain diffusion MRI with an application to genetics. Neuroimage 100, 75–90 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lambert, C., Simon, H., Colman, J., Barrick, T.R.: Defining thalamic nuclei and topographic connectivity gradients in vivo. Neuroimage 158, 466–479 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O’Donnell, L.J., Westin, C.F.: Automatic tractography segmentation using a high-dimensional white matter atlas. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 26(11), 1562–1575 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Poulin, P., et al.: Learn to track: deep learning for tractography. In: Descoteaux, M., Maier-Hein, L., Franz, A., Jannin, P., Collins, D.L., Duchesne, S. (eds.) MICCAI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10433, pp. 540–547. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siless, V., Chang, K., Fischl, B., Yendiki, A.: Anatomicuts: hierarchical clustering of tractography streamlines based on anatomical similarity. Neuroimage 166, 32–45 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tournier, J., Calamante, F., Connelly, A., et al.: MRtrix: diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 22(1), 53–66 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, J., Aydogan, D.B., Varma, R., Toga, A.W., Shi, Y.: Topographic regularity for tract filtering in brain connectivity. In: Niethammer, M., et al. (eds.) IPMI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10265, pp. 263–274. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, J., Aydogan, D.B., Varma, R., Toga, A.W., Shi, Y.: Modeling topographic regularity in structural brain connectivity with application to tractogram filtering. NeuroImage 183, 87–98 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wedeen, V.J., et al.: The geometric structure of the brain fiber pathways. Science 335(6076), 1628–1634 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Neuro Imaging (LONI), USC Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics InstituteKeck School of Medicine of USCLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations