Skip to main content

A Cognitive-Consistency Based Model of Population Wide Attitude Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complex Adaptive Systems

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

Abstract

Attitudes are an important component in human decision making. We focus on developing a model of attitude diffusion across people that includes social and cognitive factors. We will describe the model and the underlying theories that support its elements. Our results focus on better understanding the resiliency of attitudes—how long does it take for attitudes to change and what do they change to?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Defined as a maximum of .01 difference between concept valences between iterations.

  2. 2.

    See: http://climatedebatedaily.com/ for a large set of articles both for and against anthropogenic global warming.

References

  1. Bednar, J., Bramson, A., Jones-Rooy, A., Page, S.: Conformity, Consistency, and Cultural Heterogeneity. University of Michigan, Mimeo (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Castellano, C., Vilone, D., Vespignani, A.: Incomplete ordering of the voter model on small-world networks. Eur. Lett. 63(1), 153–158 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Change, Y.P.O.C.: Climate change in the american mind: Americans’ climate change beliefs, attitudes, policy preferences, and actions. Technical report, George Mason University (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, P., Redner, S.: Majority rule dynamics in finite dimensions. Phys. Rev. E 71 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Delgado, J.: Emergence of social conventions in complex networks. Artif. Intell. 141(1–2), 171–185 (2002). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TYF-46RDC1K-5/2/6a3018fe523d5093b5b4ea60f6053ee9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dovidio, J.F., Kawakami, K., Gaertner, S.L.: Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82(1), 62–68 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fazio, R.H., Jackson, J.R., Dunton, B.C., Williams, C.: Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69, 1013–1027 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fazio, R.H., Olson, M.A.: Attitudes: foundations, functions, and consequences. In: Hogg, M.A., Cooper, J. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Social Psychology. Sage, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G.: Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychol. Bull. 132, 692–731 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gawronski, B., Strack, F.: On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: dissonance changes explicit but not implicit attitudes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40, 535–542 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldstone, R.L., Janssen, M.: Computational models of collective behavior. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9(9) (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hopfield, J.J.: Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 2554–2558 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones, C.R.M., Fazio, R.H.: Associative strength and consumer choice behavior. In: Haugtvedt, C.P., Herr, P.M., Kardes, F.R. (eds.) Handbook of Consumer Psychology, pp. 437–459. Psychology Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krosnick, J.A.: The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: a study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluation, and voting behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 55(2), 196–210 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kunda, Z., Thagard, P.: Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: a parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychol. Rev. 103(2), 284–308 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lakkaraju, K.: Agreement, information and time in multiagent systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lepper, M.R., Shultz, T.R.: Dissonance. In: Wilson, R.A., Keil, F.C. (eds.) The MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Levitan, L.C., Visser, P.S.: The impact of the social context on resistance to persuasion: effortful versus effortless responsees to counter-attitudinal information. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44, 640–649 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lima, F., Sousa, A., Sumour, M.: Majority-vote on directed erdos-renyi random graphs. Phys. A 387, 3503–3510 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Mason, W.A., Conrey, F.R., Smith, E.R.: Situating social influence processes: dynamic, multidirectional flows of influence within social networks. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 11 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McConnell, A.R., Leibold, J.M.: Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37, 435–442 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Page, S.E., Sander, L.M., Schneider-Mizell, C.M.: Conformity and dissonance in generalized voter model. J. Stat. Phys. 128(6), 1279–1287 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Pereira, L.F.C., Moreira, F.G.B.: Majority-vote model on random graphs. Phys. Rev. E 71(016123) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Read, S.J., Snow, C.J., Simon, D.: Constraint satisfaction processes in social reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Read, S.J., Vanman, E.J., Miller, L.C.: Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes, and gestalt principles: (re)introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 1(1), 26–53 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Russo, J.E., Carlson, K.A., Meloy, M.G., Yong, K.: The goal of consistency as a cause of information distortion. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rydell, R.J., McConnell, A.R.: Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: a systems of reasoning analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91(6), 995–1008 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shoda, Y., Mischel, W.: Personality as a stable cognitive-affective activation network: characteristic patterns of behavior variation emerge from a stable personality structure. In: Read, S.J., Miller, L.C. (eds.) Connectionist Models of Social Reasoning and Social Behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Simon, D.: A third view of the black box: cognitive coherence in legal decision making. Univ. Chic. Law Rev. 71 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Simon, D., Holyoak, K.J.: Structural dynamics of cognition: from consistency theories to constraint satisfaction. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6(6), 283–294 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Simon, D., Krawczyk, D.C., Holyoak, K.J.: Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction. Psychol. Sci. 15(5), 331 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Simon, D., Snow, C.J., Read, S.J.: The redux of cognitive consistency theories: evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86(6), 814–837 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Simon, D., Krawczyk, D.C., Bleicher, A., Holyoak, K.J.: The transience of constructed preferences. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 21, 1–14 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sood, V., Antal, T., Redner, S.: Voter models on heterogenous networks. Phys. Rev. E 77 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Spellman, B.A., Ullman, J.B., Holyoak, K.J.: A coherence model of cognitive consistency: dynamics of attitude change during the persian gulf war. J. Soc. Issues 49(4), 147–165 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Strogatz, S.H.: Exploring complex networks. Nature 410(6825), 268–276 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35065725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Suchecki, K., Eguiluz, V.M., Miguel, M.S.: Voter model dynamics in complex networks: role of dimensionality, disorder and degree distribution (2008). arXiv:Cond-mat/0504482v1

  39. Thagard, P.: Coherence in Thought and Action. Life and Mind: Philosophical Issues in Biology and Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Visser, P.S., Clark, L.M.: Attitudes. In: Kuper, A., Kuper, J. (eds.) Social Science Encyclopedia. Routledge, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Visser, P.S., Cooper, J.: Attitude change. In: Hogg, M., Cooper, J. (eds.) Sage Handbook of Social Psychology. Sage Publications, Los Angeles (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Visser, P.S., Mirabile, R.R.: Attitudes in the social contex: the impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87(6), 779–795 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/30918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wilson, T.D., Lindsey, S., Schooler, T.Y.: A model of dual attitudes. Psychol. Rev. 107(1), 101–126 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energys National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiran Lakkaraju .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright projection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lakkaraju, K., Speed, A. (2019). A Cognitive-Consistency Based Model of Population Wide Attitude Change. In: Carmichael, T., Collins, A., Hadžikadić, M. (eds) Complex Adaptive Systems. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20309-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20309-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20307-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20309-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics