Skip to main content

Cross-Country Comparison: Policies, Patterns and Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender-Biased Sex Selection in South Korea, India and Vietnam

Part of the book series: Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development ((DTSD,volume 11))

  • 372 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a cross-country comparison of the policy response to sex selection. The comparison reveals that each country follows diverse policy intentions ranging from protecting fetal rights in Korea, to women’s rights in India, to a balanced population structure in Vietnam. The three countries all responded with similar policy instruments including legal bans, awareness-raising, gender equity laws, and incentives. These instruments are typically implemented in concert over extended periods. Nevertheless, these policies fell short on impact. They did not deliver what they were designed to do: to improve sex selection. Although SRB normalized in South Korea, this was not due to policy changes. Neither India nor Vietnam has been able to reverse their sex selection trends to date. Despite policy inefficacy, international organizations frequently promote the same policy ‘toolbox’ to internationally harmonize policy interventions across vastly different terrains. This policy transfer has contributed to policy convergence. However, there is room for policy translation, adaptation and different focal areas in how the three countries deal with sex selection and its consequences. As such, they have prioritized certain areas over others in the 3-M-Model. South Korea has focused on the magnitudes, India on methods and Vietnam on motives, partly due to their unique path dependency and the different SRB transitional stages the countries are in.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is reflected in a rapid rise in SRB, which starts from an already skewed level of 107 and extends over a decade until SRB reaching a plateau around 112–113. This rise occurred in the 1980s in South Korea and two decades later in Vietnam (see also Den Boer & Hudson, 2017).

  2. 2.

    This language was used among 55% of the Indian interview partners (26 out of 47 people). Especially policy makers (10 out of 17) and male interviewees (13 out of 20) referred to state authorities monitoring/tracking/catching women. See also Section “Pregnancy Tracking: Targeting Women or Improving Maternal Health?” in Chap. 6.

  3. 3.

    More critical observers stated during field research that Vietnam’s eagerness to address sex selection as a novel population problem was also due to administrative reasons. The governmental body in charge of population matters (GOPFP) had met their principle mandate (to lowering fertility to replacement level) early. It was suggested that the institutional structure would risk becoming obsolete in the absence of a new population mandate (e.g. addressing sex imbalances).

  4. 4.

    Scholars have also pointed to confusing and contradictory gender equality messages in social and economic reforms in South Korea (see Peng, 2011).

  5. 5.

    It took India much longer to recognize the seriousness of the issue and mobilize forces against it. The Modi administration has shown this high-level dedication with his flagship BBBP scheme.

  6. 6.

    See also the related literature on international norm diffusion (Keck & Sikkink, 1998; Prantl & Nakano, 2011; Risse et al., 1999).

  7. 7.

    It is important to note that all three countries have addressed sex selection from various angles including supply-side and demand-side measures, or as proposed here, measures targeting the motives, methods and magnitudes of sex selection. Yet, they have prioritized certain instruments over others.

  8. 8.

    For example, a 1997 poster campaign stated, “I want to be born with the blessing of mama and papa. I am frightened of abortion for being a girl. Please protect my life” (PPFK, 1998, p. 15). A 1998 slogan read, “Life is [...] born not by selection but by love” (PPFK, 1999, p. 19) and a 1999 campaign emphasized, “I don’t want to be written off! Induced abortion is really an action to write off a life” showing both a girl and a boy that are crossed out (PPFK, 2000, p. 18). See Section “Love for Daughters, Babies and other Pro-life Campaigns” in Chap. 5.

  9. 9.

    The concept of convergence in divergence is used in Information and Communication Theory to describe how systems become similar to varying degrees (Miike, 2007).

References

  • Agnihotri, S. B. (2015, April 1). We need to learn from the South Korean experience on the demand side. Girls Count Newsletter, 2(5), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breakthrough. (2017). Mission Hazaar. Stop gender-biased sex selection. Retrieved March 26, 2018, from https://inbreakthrough.tv/campaign/mission-hazaar/

  • Chung, W., & Das Gupta, M. (2007). Why is son preference declining in South Korea? The role of development and public policy, and the implications for China and India (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1020841) (p. 33). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conly, S. (2016). One child: Do we have a right to more? New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, M. J. (2008). Fatal misconception: The struggle to control world population. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croll, E. (2000). Endangered daughters: Discrimination and development in Asia. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Boer, A., & Hudson, V. M. (2017). Patrilineality, son preference, and sex selection in South Korea and Vietnam. Population and Development Review, 43(1), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEPOCEN. (2016). End-line study on situation of domestic violence and sex ratio at birth in Hai Duong and Ben Tre provinces (Endline Survey No. RFP#UNFPA/VNM/16/01) (p. 80). Hanoi, Vietnam: UNFPA-Depocen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2015). Action document for the global programme to prevent son preference and gender-biased sex selection. Retrieved August 2, 2016, from https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/file/48549/download_en?token=hyseRA9W

  • Government of India. (2018). India economic survey 2017–18 volume 1, Annexures (Economic survey). New Delhi, India. Retrieved April 3, 2018, from: http://mofapp.nic.in:8080/economicsurvey/

  • Guilmoto, C. Z. (2007). Sex-ratio imbalance in Asia: Trends, consequences and policy responses. In Presented at the 4th Asia Pacific conference on sexual and reproductive health (p. 12). Hyderabad, India: UNFPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilmoto, C. Z. (2009). The sex ratio transition in Asia. Population and Development Review, 35(3), 519–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilmoto, C. Z., Dudwick, N., Gjonça, A., & Rahm, L. (2018). How do demographic trends change? The onset of birth masculinization in Albania, Georgia, and Vietnam 1990–2005. Population and Development Review, 44(1), 37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Z., Das Gupta, M., & Li, S. (2016). ‘Missing girls’ in China and India: Trends and policy challenges. Asian Population Studies, 12(2), 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J. A. (2000). New reproductive technologies, women’s health and autonomy: Freedom or dependency. New Delhi, India: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanoi School of Public Health. (2012). Vietnam country report. Health system stewardship in Vietnam, India and China (HESVIC) (p. 262). Hanoi, Vietnam: Hanoi School of Public Health. Retrieved July 27, 2016, from http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/91234_en.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, K., & Knill, C. (2005). Causes and conditions of Cross-National Policy Convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 775–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joachim, J. M. (2007). Agenda setting, the UN, and NGOs: Gender violence and reproductive rights. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachim, J., & Schneiker, A. (2012). Changing discourses, changing practices? Gender mainstreaming and security. Comparative European Politics, 10(5), 528–563. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2011.35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. London, UK: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KIHASA, & UNFPA. (1996). Sex preference for children and gender discrimination in Asia. Seoul, South Korea: KIHASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.-S. (2004). Missing girls in South Korea: Trends, levels and regional variations. Population, 59(6), 865–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konner, M. (2015). Women after all. Sex, evolution, and the end of male supremacy. New York, NY: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostenzer, J. (2016). Eliminating prenatal sex selection? The global agenda and National Action Plans. The Global Studies Journal, 9(2), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, H. (2009). Policy learning and transfer: The experience of the developmental state in East Asia. Policy & Politics, 37(3), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, M. D., & Aligica, P. D. (2015). Institutional analysis and political economy. In E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, & X. Wu (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public policy (pp. 87–97). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekong Economics Ltd. (2013). 2012 Baseline study on Sex Ratio at Birth in Hai Duong Province (p. 110). Hai Duong. Retrieved August 16, 2015, from http://www.mekongeconomics.com/dev/images/stories/pds/J0886.pdf

  • Miike, Y. (2007). An Asiacentric reflection on Eurocentric Bias in communication theory. Communication Monographs, 74(2), 272–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. (1970). The challenge of world poverty: A world anti-poverty program in outline. London, UK: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandi, A., & Deolalikar, A. B. (2013). Does a legal ban on sex-selective abortions improve child sex ratios? Evidence from a policy change in India. Journal of Development Economics, 103(July), 216–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen Dinh, C., Luu Bich, N., Nguyen Thi, T., Ha Tuan, A., Bui Thi, H., Tran, K., … Vu Thi, T. (2013). BÁO CÁO TỔNG QUAN ĐÁNH GIÁ TÌNH HÌNH THỰC HIỆN PHÁP LỆNH DÂN SỐ VÀ KHUYẾN NGHỊ CHO DỰ ÁN LUẬT DÂN SỐ (10 year evaluation of the 2003 population ordinance) (p. 114). Hanoi, Vietnam: Institute for Population and Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, I. (2011). The good, the bad and the confusing: The political economy of social care expansion in South Korea: The political economy of social care expansion in South Korea. Development and Change, 42(4), 905–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PPFK. (1996). 1995 PPFK Annual Report. Seoul.

    Google Scholar 

  • PPFK. (1998). 1997 PPFK Annual Report. Seoul.

    Google Scholar 

  • PPFK. (1999). 1998 PPFK Annual Report on Family Health and Welfare (No. 37–98). Seoul.

    Google Scholar 

  • PPFK. (2000). 1999 PPFK Annual Report. Reproductive Health Programme to Enhance the Quality of Life of People (No. 38–99). Seoul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prantl, J., & Nakano, R. (2011). Global norm diffusion in East Asia: How China and Japan implement the responsibility to protect. International Relations, 25(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117811404450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahm, L. (2017). La convergence des politiques de lutte contre la sélection sexuelle prénatale: Corée du Sud, Inde et Vietnam. Critique Internationale, 77(4), 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., Sikkink, K., Smith, S., Biersteker, T., Brown, C., … Groome, J. (1999). Power of human rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. C., & Ross, J. A. (Eds.). (2007). The global family planning revolution: Three decades of population policies and programs. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, S. (2015). Studying public policy-making. In E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, & X. Wu (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public policy (pp. 44–58). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. (2015). Policy design and transfer. In E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, & X. Wu (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public policy (pp. 217–228). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2012). Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies, 33(6), 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNFPA Albania. (2012). Sex imbalances at birth in Albania. Current trends, consequences and policy implications. Tirana, Albania: UNFPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFPA Vietnam. (2014, October 22). Towards a modern Vietnam where a preference for sons is a thing of the past. Retrieved March 26, 2018, from http://vietnam.unfpa.org/en/news/towards-modern-viet-nam-where-preference-sons-thing-past?page=4

  • WHO. (2011). Preventing gender-biased sex selection: An interagency statement OHCHR, UNFPA, UNICEF, UN women and WHO. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, A. (2010). Abortion in Korea: A human rights perspective on the current debate over enforcement of the Laws prohibiting abortion. Journal of International Business and Law, 9(1), 153–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W. W. H. (2017). Are policy diffusion, policy learning and policy transfer real? Explaining the divergence behind convergence in global public policy and management practices. Retrieved March 26, 2018, from http://www.ippapublicpolicy.org/panel/getPanel.php?panel=168&conference=7

  • Yoo, S. H., Hayford, S. R., & Agadjanian, V. (2017). Old habits die hard? Lingering son preference in an era of normalizing sex ratios at birth in South Korea. Population Research and Policy Review, 36(1), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-016-9405-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rahm, L. (2020). Cross-Country Comparison: Policies, Patterns and Processes. In: Gender-Biased Sex Selection in South Korea, India and Vietnam. Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20234-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20234-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20233-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20234-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics