Advertisement

The Impact of Employees’ Own Knowledge on the Effectiveness of Project Managers’ Development Programs

  • Pawel PietrasEmail author
  • Maciej Szczepanczyk
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (volume 963)

Abstract

The article presents experiences from the implementation of three development programs for employees in the construction industry. Development programs were implemented in organizations culturally rooted in three different countries: Poland, Austria and France. Each of the programs had a similar goal - to increase the competence of project managers. However, each of the programs was based on different assumptions and used the experience of the organisations? employees to a different level. It resulted from cultural differences in the approach to knowledge management of the organization. The article attempts to evaluate the effectiveness of development programs in the function of using the knowledge of the employees. The research was conducted for over two years, it resulted from the duration of development programs of the surveyed organisations.

Keywords

Training Development of managers Project management competencies Organization culture 

References

  1. 1.
    Hameed, A., Waheed, A.: Employee development and its affect on employee performance a conceptual framework. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2(13), 224?229 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strandberg, C.: The role of human resource management in corporate social responsibility issue brief and roadmap. Report for Industry Canada. Burnaby, BC: Strandberg Consulting (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Riveros, A.M., Tsai, T.S.: Career commitment and organizational commitment in for profit and non-profit sectors. Int. J. Emerg. Sci. 1(3), 324?340 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hirsh, W.: Career development in employing organization: practices and challenges from a UK perspective, Guidance for Work-force Development Conference, held by CEDEFOP (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Witko, K., Bernes, K.B., Magnusson, K., Bardick, A.D.: Senior high school career planning: what students want. J. Educ. Enquiry, 6(1) (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hooff, B.V.D., Hendrix, L.: Eargerness and Willingness to Share: The Relevance of Different Attitudes Towards Knowledge Sharing. Stadtmagistrat Innsbruck, Innsbruck (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Verbeke, W., Belschak, F., Bagozzi, R., Wuyts, S.: Gaining access to intrafirm knowledge: an internal market perspective on knowledge sharing. J. Hum. Perform. 24(3), 205?230 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kiessling, T., Richey, G., Meng, J., Dabic, M.: Exploring knowledge management to organizational performance outcomes in a transitional economy. J. World Bus. 44(4), 421?433 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dickel, D.G., Moura, G.L.: Organizational performance evaluation in intangible criteria: a model based on knowledge management and innovation management. RAI J. Technol. Manage. Innovation 13(3), 211?220 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Byukusenge, E., Munene, J., Orobia, L.: Knowledge management and business performance: mediating effect of innovation. J. Bus. Manage. Sci. 4(4), 82?92 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cancialosi, C.: 6 Key Steps to Influencing Effective Knowledge Transfer in Your Business, Forbes, 8 December 2014Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stankiewicz-Mróz, A.: Approach to the issues of leadership in the processes of companies acquisitions. Procedia Manuf. 3, 793?798 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lodz University of TechnologyLódzPoland

Personalised recommendations